Eclipse Government

Posted: **01 Feb 2024, 05:56**

Defendant Name: Joey Casper
Defendant Phone: 3291349
Defendant Address: N/A
(( Defendant Discord: .ctrl ))
Requested Attorney: Frank Raven/David Coast

Charging Department: Los Santos Sheriff's Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 30/JAN/2024 23:30
Charge(s):

WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By)

Narrative:
I would like to appeal my charges

I, Joey Casper, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

Posted: **02 Feb 2024, 00:49**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 2nd day of February, 2024.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Posted: **02 Feb 2024, 12:55**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on 02/FEB/2024.

I, Al Triton, a Prosecuting Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Al Triton
Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 318-8168 — [email protected]

Posted: **02 Feb 2024, 12:55**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Chief Justice Mason and pertaining parties,

The prosecution wishes to have the prior notice from Junior Prosecuting Attorney Rowin Lawson stricken from this docket at this time. Junior Attorney Lawson accidentally placed the Court Information Request on the docket rather than our internal case log for this case. Junior Attorney Lawson is still being trained and simply made a mistake.

We thank the court for their assistance in this matter and we'll strive to avoid it from happening again.

Very Respectfully,

Al Triton
Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 318-8168 — [email protected]

Posted: **10 Mar 2024, 20:11**

I have chosen to go private with Wood Law

Posted: **12 Mar 2024, 06:51**

Notification Of Counsel
State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

To whom it may concern,

I, David Coast, an Associate with Wood Law, will be representing the Defendant, Joey Casper in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Respectfully,

David Coast
Associate
Bar Certified Attorney
☏ 593-1338

Posted: **12 Mar 2024, 06:52**

Name Change
State of San Andreas v. Joey Vespucci

To whom it may concern,

Joey Casper has legally changed his name to Joey Vespucci.

Respectfully,

David Coast
Associate
Bar Certified Attorney
☏ 593-1338

Posted: **07 Jul 2024, 18:56**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 7th of July, 2024.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper is hereby activated by this Court under #24-CM-0040.

Both the State and Defendant in this case are still awaiting adequate representation. At this time the court will delay the Order for Discovery until adequate representation has been assigned for the Defendant and a State Prosecutor has been assigned to the case and both parties inform the court they are ready to proceed.

In accordance with guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas, this case shall require an in-person trial. Once all pretrial matters have been resolved, a Notice of Scheduling will be issued to arrange an appropriate time for trial.

So ordered,

Superior Court Judge
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]

Posted: **08 Jul 2024, 07:30**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 09/06/2024.

I, Izaak Scott, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the defendant, Joey Casper/Vespucci/Diesel in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 411-2330 — [email protected]

Posted: **11 Jul 2024, 21:01**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on 11/JUL/2024.

I, Terence Williams, a Prosecuting Attorney of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Terence Williams
Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

Posted: **11 Jul 2024, 22:58**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on 11/JUL/2024.

I, Ren Sanchez, a Prosecuting Attorney of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Junior Prosecutor
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 200-4817 — [email protected]

Posted: **12 Jul 2024, 02:12**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A court order was entered in the above case on the 11th of July, 2024.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.

So ordered,

Superior Court Judge
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]

Posted: **18 Jul 2024, 20:30**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 18th of July, 2024.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

Exhibit #1: Arrest Report - Joey Vespucci, 30/JAN/2024
ARREST REPORT

MUGSHOT
SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
- Full Name: Joey Casper
  Telephone Number: 3291349
  Licenses Revoked: No
  Charges:
  WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive of a Gov. employee
  
  Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VEHICLES INVOLVED
- Vehicle A: N/A
DEPUTY DETAILS
- Full Name: Hugo Hernandez
  Badge Number: 24008
  Callsign: 3-W-12
INCIDENT DETAILS
- Date of Arrest: 2024-01-29
  Deputies Involved: N/A
  
  Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
  Conclusion of SIB casefile #161036
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station
  Exhibit A: Evidence found in SIB casefile #161036 (UPDATED)
  EVIDENCE INCLUDED IN OTHER EXHIBITS
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE

Exhibit #2: Witness Statement - Lieutenant Dante Archer
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Case Information
- Case Number: [N/A]
  Incident Date: [N/A]
Witness Information
- Name: [Dante Archer]
  Date of Birth: [N/A]
  Phone Number: [N/A]
  Occupation: [LEO]
Witness Statement
- Whilst sitting in a speed trap a black kamacho passed me speeding going around 170ish. I went to pull it over for just a normal 10-55. Upon pulling it over I noticed it was a 4 stacked shadowsBlack kamacho as the R/O was a Alistair Vespucci. Due to me arresting Alistair prior to this, I knew his license was still suspended. Moments later the kamacho began opening fire on me and taking off. I called a code 1 and I started to bleed out due to the gunshots wounds. After providing all the infomation possible to other units they managed to find it and pursue it. I was in the hospital at the time so I had no involvment in the next part.
  
  When visual was gained units pursued the Black kamacho that had just shot at me resulting in the shadows to shoot at the deputies pursuing them. If they didn't surrender they were shot down by deputies and taken into custody. In the end we had all four in custody. Alistair Vespucci, Zoe Williams, Joey Casper, and Vajo Smith. They were charged accordingly for shooting at deputies on that scene but we were not sure which ones shot at myself initially at my traffic stop.
  
  Ballistics were conducted with Joey, Zoes, and Vajos Pistol. 50s in order to determine which one shot at me. After matching the engravings I learnt that Vajo was the one that mostly shot at me but also Joey. No bullets matched with Zoes gun however she was charged with drive by later on by [redacted]. All 3 (Alistair, Joey, Vajo) need to be brought into the interrogation. We need to determine if Alistair was the driver or not so he can be charged with Acessory to Drive by whereas with Joey and Vajo, they will get Drive by of a Gov regardless of what they say.
  
  The suspect has been charged following the analysis of the ballistic evidence collected at the scene and the subsequent confiscation of the weapon from the suspect.
  
  BALLISTICS INCLUDED IN OTHER EXHIBITS
Witness Affirmation
- I, [Dante Archer], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
  
  Signed,
  
  [Lieutenant Dante Archer]
  Commanding Officer, Major Crimes Division
  Los Santos County Sheriff's Department
  
  Date: [29/FEB/2024]

Exhibit #3: Evidence - Unregistered firearm

Exhibit #4: Ballistics report
Ballistics conducted on all the weapons. 2 of the Pistol. 50s bullets had a positive match with the bullets found in the shot up cruiser.

The ballistic bag matches up with the grid below showing which bullet belongs to which individuals gun.
Spoiler

Exhibit #5: Arrest reports - Alistair Vespucci, 30/JAN/2024
ARREST REPORT

MUGSHOT
SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
- Full Name: Alistair Vespucci
  Telephone Number: 3156876
  Licenses Revoked: No
  Charges:
  VF01 - Evading an Officer
  
  GM04 - Resisting Arrest
  
  SF02 - Attempted Murder of a Gov. employee
  
  NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
  
  WF03 - Possession of a Class 2 Firearm
  
  Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VEHICLES INVOLVED
- Vehicle A: Black Kamacho, LORDALI, Alistair Vespucci
DEPUTY DETAILS
- Full Name: Dave Spencer
  Badge Number: 21931
  Callsign: 11-R-13
INCIDENT DETAILS
- Date of Arrest: 2024-01-29
  Deputies Involved: Lester Conway, Zero Hunter, Cole Richardsun, Hugo Hernandez
  
  Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
  INITIAL SITUATION
  Investigator Hernandez called out a CODE-1 at the end of my FTS session with Trainee Cater so I told the trainee to wait and responded in a Kamacho also joining TAC-1. Hugo described a 4x occupied Black Kamacho, RO Alistair Vespucci that had open fired during a traffic stop as he was calling for backup units. The vehicle we thought was long gone so after searching the area decided to clear TAC
  
  REGAINED VC AND SHOOTOUT.
  Investigator Hunter, called over the radio that he had spotted the vehicle going south on Senora FWY near Bradocks Farm and decided to keep distance whilst following the vehicle. Units were responding but he was made out by the suspects and they went up Mount Gordo and began evading from Hunter. Ania was a passenger and returned shots from the vehicle. At this point myself and Deputy Richardsun were responding in a Kamacho of our own and the vehicle had crashed when we had arrived. Alistair Vespucci exited the vehicle from the passenger side and ran down the hill towards myself and Deputy Richardsun. Mr Vespucci then took his shotgun from his shoulder and began firinig at us two. We returned fire and managed to take down the suspect without taking their life.
  
  THE ARREST
  Mr Vespucci was immediately BLS’d giving him life saving treatment until medics arrived, before this he was cuffed and disarmed then read his rights which he acknowledged that he understood. From there a Paramedic attended and treated Alistair and loaded him up into an Ambulance. Once in the ambulance another unit called DOC for a HVT transport
  
  THE TRANSPORT
  Once arriving at Paleto MD, I collected Alistair Vespucci and suspended his licenses as well as put him into the back of my cruiser until the DOC transport arrived. When arrived I consulted a DOC guard and confirmed charges with Hunter then let Alistair out of my cruiser and into the DOC transport vehicle. Once shackled and inside he was transported to DOC with the other suspects and re-searched as well as mugshotted using my work camera before signing off the transfer documents and thanking DOC for their assistance. I immediately headed to Paleto Station and stored the Pump Shotgun used in the crime inside the Evidence Locker at Paleto
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Location of Evidence Locker: Paleto Station
  Exhibit A: Pump Shotgun with 44x Rounds, Gloves and 1x Cannibis
  
  Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE

Exhibit #6: Arrest reports - Zoe Williams, 30/JAN/2024
ARREST REPORT

MUGSHOT
SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
- Full Name: Zoe Williams
  Telephone Number: 2481916
  Licenses Revoked: Yes
  Driver
  
  Trucker
  
  Charges:
  WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive of a Gov. employee
  
  SF02 - Attempted Murder of a Gov. employee
  
  WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
  
  VF01 - Evading an Officer
  
  Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VEHICLES INVOLVED
- Vehicle A: Black, Kamacho LP: LORDALI, RO: Alistair Vespucci
DEPUTY DETAILS
- Full Name: Messiah Young
  Badge Number: 2750
  Callsign: 3-Z-11
INCIDENT DETAILS
- Date of Arrest: 2024-01-30
  Deputies Involved: Zero Hunter, Lester Conway, Hugo Hernandez
  
  Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
  Investigator Hernandez called a code-1 saying he almost got killed by a 4-stack Kamacho black in color, license plate LORDALI. We had no doubts it was the Shadows, since they have had a vendetta against members of SIB due to investigations conducted. We looked for the Kamacho for a bit of time before it was spotted at Mount Gordo and shots were fired. All of the suspects were apprehended and MD were called. Each of them was treated and a DOC transport took them to prison.
  
  Zoe Williams, specifically, was on the second scene at Mount Gordo seen shooting from the back passenger seat of the Kamacho at deputies, hence the driveby charge in addition. Bodycam footage will go to show.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station
  Exhibit A:
  
  Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE

SPACER

Terence Williams
Acting Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

Ren Sanchez
Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 200-4817 — [email protected]

SPACER

Posted: **18 Jul 2024, 21:36**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION TO SUPPRESS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Motion to Suppress was filed in the above case on the 18th of July, 2024.

Defendant, Joey Diesel, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests to following be suppressed from evidence;

Primarily Exhibit #2: Witness Statement - Lieutenant Dante Archer
Requested Evidence to Suppress:
Entire Exhibit
- Detailed Reasoning: The witness statement doesn't follow the correct formatting, It does not have the incident date instead it just says "N/A" Similar ruling made by Judge Daniels in case #22-CM-0036, State of San Andreas v. Hailee Joyce
  Precedence
  "Exhibit 3: Witness Statement - Luca Andollini however will not be allowed as it uses the incorrect witness format without the witness affirmation at the bottom. This ruling will set precedent that any testimony or witness statement must have the affirmation to be admissible in court."

Subsidiarily Exhibit #2: Witness Statement - Lieutenant Dante Archer
Requested Evidence to Suppress:
When visual was gained units pursued the Black kamacho that had just shot at me resulting in the shadows to shoot at the deputies pursuing them. If they didn't surrender they were shot down by deputies and taken into custody. In the end we had all four in custody. Alistair Vespucci, Zoe Williams, Joey Casper, and Vajo Smith. They were charged accordingly for shooting at deputies on that scene but we were not sure which ones shot at myself initially at my traffic stop.
- Detailed Reasoning: In the witness statement Lieutenant Dante Archer states that he was not present at all for this. Making this Personal Knowledge/Speculation since he did not directly observe the event.

Exhibit #4: Ballistics report
Requested Evidence to Suppress:
Entire Exhibit
- Detailed Reasoning: No source for the discovery is stated.

Exhibit #5: Arrest reports - Alistair Vespucci, 30/JAN/2024
Requested Evidence to Suppress:
Entire Exhibit
- Detailed Reasoning: Best evidence and Relevance, it would be more appropriate to provide Joey's arrest report for the original situation other then providing someone elses.

Exhibit #6: Arrest reports - Zoe Williams, 30/JAN/2024
Requested Evidence to Suppress:
Entire Exhibit
- Detailed Reasoning: Best evidence and Relevance, it would be more appropriate to provide Joey's arrest report for the original situation other then providing someone elses.

Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 411-2330 — [email protected]

Posted: **18 Jul 2024, 21:50**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Motion to Compel Discovery was filed in the above case on the 18th of July, 2024.

Defendant, Joey Diesel, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Compel Discovery, and requests as follows;

Requested Discovery: Arrest Report for Joey Casper - 30/JAN/2024
- Detailed Reasoning: Joey Casper/Vespucci suffered charges from the incident before getting charged with WF02 - Shooting from a Vehicle (Drive-By). The prosecution has provided numerous other arrest reports but not Joey's.

Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 411-2330 — [email protected]

Posted: **18 Jul 2024, 21:52**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

WITNESS LIST

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Witness List was filed in the above case on the 18th of July, 2024.

The defense designates the following list of individuals as witnesses, who may be called to the stand.

Name of Witness:
Alistair Vespucci
Description: (party, fact witness, expert, other)
Fact
Witness Agency:
N/A

Name of Witness:
Zoe Williams
Description: (party, fact witness, expert, other)
Fact
Witness Agency:
N/A

Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 411-2330 — [email protected]

Posted: **20 Jul 2024, 15:16**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A decision was reached in the above case on the #20th of July, 2024.

The Court grants the Motion to Compel Discovery, considering the requested arrest report for the crimes allegedly committed on the same date. Therefore, the Prosecution is hereby ordered to produce any and all additional arrest reports that were filed for the defendant's arrests on the same date.

So ordered,

Superior Court Justice
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected][/list]

Posted: **21 Jul 2024, 19:30**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judge McFornell and pertaining parties,

The Prosecution would like to present our rebuttal to the Defense's Motion to Suppress.

Exhibit #2: The precedent provided for the first suppression of this exhibit is misused by the Defense. The specific precedent is for the signing of witness statements, which this specific statement is. The Defense wants to apply this precedent for a different issue than it was ruled on for the witness writing "Not Applicable" in various places. The Prosecution argues that not filling out an incident date or other personal information should not be grounds for suppression as the statement provides the correct narrative and is signed.

The Prosecution argues that the second suppression of this exhibit should not be considered speculation. The witness personally witnessed the defendant and their accomplices evade from the scene and being pursued by units after the shooting. While the witness had no part in the pursuit, they would have been privy to the arrest of the defendant and their accomplices, supported by the arrest reports provided in Exhibits #5 and #6.

Additionally, the Prosecution would like to object to the fact the Defense is asking to suppress the same exhibit twice. If the Defense is not confident in their Motion to get the entire exhibit suppressed, why do they feel it necessary to ask to suppress the same exhibit twice?

Exhibit #4: The Defense argues against the origins of this ballistics report. The Prosecution has provided the official ballistics report received from the Sheriff's Department, which is further referenced in the statement in Exhibit #2 as being provided as a separate exhibit.

Exhibit #5: The arrest report is provided as supporting information to Exhibit #2. Whether or not the arrest report for the defendant's original arrest is better than this arrest report is irrelevant as it provides the same information.

Exhibit #6: Same argument as for Exhibit #5.

Regards,

Terence Williams
Acting Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

Posted: **22 Jul 2024, 05:48**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

REBUTTAL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

Rebuttal was filed in the above case on the 22rd of July, 2024.

Defendant, Joey Casper, by and through his attorney, and hereby submits this reply to the Prosecution’s response regarding the Motion to Suppress filed on July 18, 2024. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Suppress should be granted.

Exhibit 2: The Defense maintains that the witness statement should be suppressed due to improper formatting and the absence of an incident date, as indicated by "N/A." We cited the case of State of San Andreas v. Hailee Joyce (#22-CM-0036), where Judge Daniels ruled against improperly formatted witness statements. The Prosecution argues that this precedent is misused, suggesting it only pertains to the signing of statements. However, the Defense asserts that the integrity and completeness of a witness statement are needed for admissibility. The lack of an incident date compromises the document’s reliability and makes it difficult to exact the circumstances of the incident.

Exhibit 2 Subsidiarily: The Defense further argues that the statement contains speculation/personal knownledge, specifically regarding the events that Lieutenant Dante Archer did not directly observe. The Prosecution’s counter-argument that Lieutenant Archer witnessed the pursuit and arrests does not address the fact that he admitted to not being present during critical events, rendering his account partially speculative. The Defense emphasizes that suppression is warranted under personal knowledge defined by "A witness may not testify about any matter of which they have no personal knowledge. Only if the witness has directly observed an event (sight, smell, hearing, taste, and touch) may the witness testify about it. Personal knowledge must be shown before a witness may testify concerning a matter." which requires that a witness testify only to matters they have personal knowledge of.

Exhibit 2 Subsidiarily Suppression
Whilst sitting in a speed trap a black kamacho passed me speeding going around 170ish. I went to pull it over for just a normal 10-55. Upon pulling it over I noticed it was a 4 stacked shadowsBlack kamacho as the R/O was a Alistair Vespucci. Due to me arresting Alistair prior to this, I knew his license was still suspended. Moments later the kamacho began opening fire on me and taking off. I called a code 1 and I started to bleed out due to the gunshots wounds. After providing all the infomation possible to other units they managed to find it and pursue it. I was in the hospital at the time so I had no involvement in the next part. (This is him admitting to not being present)

When visual was gained units pursued the Black kamacho that had just shot at me resulting in the shadows to shoot at the deputies pursuing them. If they didn't surrender they were shot down by deputies and taken into custody. In the end we had all four in custody. Alistair Vespucci, Zoe Williams, Joey Casper, and Vajo Smith. They were charged accordingly for shooting at deputies on that scene but we were not sure which ones shot at myself initially at my traffic stop. (This is what the defense wants suppressed)

Ballistics were conducted with Joey, Zoes, and Vajos Pistol. 50s in order to determine which one shot at me. After matching the engravings I learnt that Vajo was the one that mostly shot at me but also Joey. No bullets matched with Zoes gun however she was charged with drive by later on by [redacted]. All 3 (Alistair, Joey, Vajo) need to be brought into the interrogation. We need to determine if Alistair was the driver or not so he can be charged with Acessory to Drive by whereas with Joey and Vajo, they will get Drive by of a Gov regardless of what they say.

The suspect has been charged following the analysis of the ballistic evidence collected at the scene and the subsequent confiscation of the weapon from the suspect.

Exhibit 4: The Defense contends that the ballistics report lacks a clear source for its discovery. The Prosecution’s assurance that it was provided by the Sheriff's Department is insufficient without proper documentation of its origin. The Defense requests the court to enforce stricter rules on the admissibility of forensic evidence to ensure the reliability and chain of custody is intact.

Exhibit 5 & 6: The Defense argues that the arrest reports of Alistair Vespucci and Zoe Williams are irrelevant to Joey Casper’s case and do not constitute the best evidence. The Prosecution’s claim that these reports provide the same information as Joey’s arrest report does not justify their admissibility. Relevance is defined by "Evidence is considered relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact that is important to the case more or less probable than the fact would be without the evidence." The defense not only asserts that these arrests report for other individuals who are notJoey Casper do not make the charges on Joey Casper more or less probable.

This also falls under best evidence, why provide arrest reports for other people when you can just provide the original arrest report for Joey Casper?

For the above reasons, the Defense respectfully requests that the court grant the Motion to Suppress Exhibits #2, #4, #5, and #6, as outlined in the original motion and supported by this reply. If the prosecution does not reply to this, we require no more say and are ready for a ruling on this suppression.

Senior Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 411-2330 — [email protected]

Posted: **22 Jul 2024, 05:56**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Motion for Involuntary Dismissal was filed in the above case on the 22/JUL/2024

Defendant, Joey Casper, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

Reasoning: The prosecution is failing to follow to a court order.
- Detailed Explanation: The court ordered the prosecution to bring Joey Casper's original arrest report to evidence on the 20/JUL. The prosecution responded to a motion to suppress on the 21/JUL where they quoted "The arrest report is provided as supporting information to Exhibit #2. Whether or not the arrest report for the defendant's original arrest is better than this arrest report is irrelevant as it provides the same information."
  
  The prosecution has shown clear intent to not include the original arrest report for Joey Casper into evidence yet argues it provides the same information as other arrest reports in regards about other arrest reports getting suppressed. This means that the original arrest report has been seen and/or in the possession of the prosecution.

Senior Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 411-2330 — [email protected]

Posted: **22 Jul 2024, 20:39**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judge McFornell and pertaining parties,

The Prosecution will make it simple regarding the Defense's argument of Best Evidence, Motion to Compel, and Motion for Involuntary Dismissal.

The arrest report for the defendant's original arrest would have been provided, had we had it. But we don't, and never have. And for reasons out of our control, we won't be able to provide it.

This is the final response from the Prosecution regarding the Motion to Suppress and subsequent Motion for Involuntary Dismissal.

Regards,

Terence Williams
Acting Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

Posted: **23 Jul 2024, 07:47**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judge McFornell and pertaining parties,

The Defense is ready for a ruling on the motion to suppress and the motion for involuntary dismissal.

When these ruling are made the defense is ready to procced to trial.

Senior Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 411-2330 — [email protected]

Posted: **23 Jul 2024, 22:26**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper
#24-CM-0040

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 23rd of July, 2024.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for the request is as follows;

Reasoning: Clarifying evidence for ease of use
- Detailed Explanation: The Prosecution is asking for a 7-day continuance to get access to the official coding for the evidence in Exhibits #5 and #6 for ease of use for all parties involved. We apologize for the initial inconvenience and hope to sort this prior to trial.

Terence Williams
Acting Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

Posted: **24 Jul 2024, 06:37**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judge McFornell and pertaining parties,

The Defense has no objections to the motion of continuance.

Acting Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 411-2330 — [email protected]

Posted: **28 Jul 2024, 22:59**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judge McFornell and pertaining parties,

Exhibits #5 and #6 have been edited with the original coding.

Regards,

Terence Williams
Acting Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]

Eclipse Government

#24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

#24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper

Re: #24-CM-0040, State of San Andreas v. Joey Casper