#24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Locked
Zweal
Posts: 3
Joined: 02 Apr 2021, 18:09
ECRP Forum Name: Zweal
Discord:

#24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Zweal »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Rahul Akbar
Defendant Phone: 217-3552
Defendant Address: N/A
(( Defendant Discord: zweal00 ))
Requested Attorney: David Coast
Image
Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 30/JAN/2024 21:04
Charge(s):
  • Involuntary Attempted Manslaughter
Narrative:
I was unlawfully arrested when acting in self defense, during which, the offender was comitting a felony. Additionally, I have been convicted of Involuntary Attempted Manslaughter even though the first and only reason for my arrest was, "Failure to report a crime" (The officers at location acknowledged and confirmed that I was acting in selfdefense). All the events leading up to my arrest occurred during a timespan of 5-10 minutes.



I, Rahul Akbar, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Bret Hyland
Posts: 345
Joined: 03 Jan 2021, 20:09
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Bret Hyland »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 30th day of January, 2024.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.




Superior Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 225-3056
[email protected]
Image
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar
#24-CM-0039

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 7th of July, 2024.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar is hereby activated by this Court under #24-CM-0039.

Both the State and Defendant in this case are still awaiting adequate representation. At this time the court will delay the Order for Discovery until adequate representation has been assigned for the Defendant and a State Prosecutor has been assigned to the case and both parties inform the court they are ready to proceed.

In accordance with guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas, this case shall require an in-person trial. Once all pretrial matters have been resolved, a Notice of Scheduling will be issued to arrange an appropriate time for trial.


So ordered,
Image
Superior Court Judge
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
User avatar
Jay Wellberg
Posts: 268
Joined: 29 Jun 2022, 18:45
ECRP Forum Name: Chilo
Discord:

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Jay Wellberg »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 7th of July, 2024.


I, Jay Wellberg, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Rahul Akbar in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Image
Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 2956979 — [email protected][/list]
Image
Luna McMillan
Posts: 354
Joined: 01 Jun 2024, 16:32
ECRP Forum Name: Kevin Jacobs
Discord: KevWolfttv

SAJB Awards

LSPD Awards for Service

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Luna McMillan »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 11th of July 2024.


I, Luna McMillan, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant(s), Rahul Akbar in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Image
Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 463-9315 —[email protected][/list]
Image
Image
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar
24-CM-0039

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on 12/JUL/2024.


I, Terence Williams, a Prosecuting Attorney of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Image
Terence Williams
Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Michael Blaise
Posts: 2407
Joined: 27 Jun 2020, 01:07
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Michael Blaise »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on 12/JUL/2024.


I, Michael Blaise, a Prosecuting Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel alongside the Primary, Terence Williams, and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Image
Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 552-8150 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar
#24-CM-0039

A court order was entered in the above case on the 13th of July, 2024.


The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.

So ordered,
Image
Superior Court Judge
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
User avatar
Jay Wellberg
Posts: 268
Joined: 29 Jun 2022, 18:45
ECRP Forum Name: Chilo
Discord:

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Jay Wellberg »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar
#24-CM-0039

A Motion for Involuntary Dismissal was filed in the above case on the Day of Month, Year.


The Defendant, Rahul Akbar, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Involuntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;


  • Reasoning: The defense has attempted to contact the defendant but has been unsuccessful.
    • Detailed Explanation: The defense has attempted to contact the defendant multiple times to check if they would like to continue with the case but have not been able to contact them.




Image
Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 2956979 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Michael Blaise
Posts: 2407
Joined: 27 Jun 2020, 01:07
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Michael Blaise »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar
#24-CM-0039

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 13th of July, 2024.


The State of San Andreas/Rahul Akbar by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #1: Rahul Akbar Arrest Report, LSPD
    Spoiler
    Image
    Image

    Los Santos Police Department

    ARREST REPORT
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"


    MUGSHOT
    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • Full Name: Rahul Akbar
        Phone Number: 2173552
        Licenses Suspended: No
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Officer III Mohamed Abdullah
        • Police Officer II Dutch Kon
        • Police Cadet Cole Harper
        Charges:
        • SF03 - Involuntary or Vehicular Manslaughter
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 30/JAN/2024

        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • 911 call has been received earlier in the day , caller claiming that he's getting shot at by a Taxi Driver. Upon arriving on the scene, mentioned Taxi employee was nowhere to be seen. Later during the day, Unit 4-A-16 as they were leaving the Mission Row area , noticed Yellow Moonbeam driving past the Mission Row and have stopped it for the traffic stop in suspicion of it being related to the crime committed earlier. Driver of the Taxi, Rahul Akbar, admitted in discharging his firearm upon a caller and leaving the area without informing the local authorities.
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.

        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: 1 x Pistol


          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: 1 x GPS
          Exhibit B: 1 x Radio
          Exhibit C: 1 x Berry Bowtie
          Exhibit D: 1 x Blue&Red Peaked Cap
          Exhibit E: 1 x Shell Trend Glasses

          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)
          Image
    Image
  • Exhibit #2: Mohamed Abdullah Witness Statement, LSPD
    Spoiler
    18/unknown.png[/img]

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 30/JAN/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Mohamed Abdullah
      Date of Birth: 25/OCT/1999
      Phone Number: 374-3648
      Occupation: Police Officer III, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • On 30/JAN/2024 Alex Kent had called MD/PD saying that he was shot, Officer Abdullah had responded to he was found to be injured infront on Mission Row.
      He gave Officer Abdullah description that a Moonbeam Taxi driver had shot him, I asked him why would he do so without escalation, he said "he litellary shot me and left what do you think", I was a bit suspicious as the Taxi driver hadn't called MD or PD even though the Mission Row Precienct is right infront of him.
      The Moonbeam Taxi was then spotted infront of Mission Row again by Officer Dutch Kon from which he called it on the radio and I responded and dismounted to talk to the driver, the driver admitted to shooting someone and not calling PD as he left immediately.
      I then asked Officer Dutch and his patner to detain the driver, and I asked Mr.Akbar if I could search his vehicle from which he did give permission and I searched it and found a pistol in his glovebox from which I confiscated.
      He then was marindarized and asked if he shot the individual he said "yes, as he was acting in self defence", I then got a couple of supervisors one of them told me that he'll talk with Rahul's supervisor.
      I asked Rahul if he had a Dashcam or Bodycam he said that he has the Company's DASHCAM, upon taking out the SD card and checking it it came back to this.
      Attached BODYCAM Footage of Officer Abdullah checking the DASHCAM footage:
      Image

      I then continued to ask Mr.Rahul why didn't he call PD or MD after he had shot the male multiple times he proceeded to reply with "I didn't see anyone around and I wanted to get away from the situation quick" from which that implies to "SF03 - Involuntary or Vehicular Manslaughter" which explains "The killing of another person without intent but in a negligent manner using any type of techniques, objects, weapons, instrument, or by a vehicle or aircraft while contravening any other law or road/air safety legislation"
      From our prespective this would be the suitable charge for this situation as Mr.Rahul had acted in self-defence and didn't have the intent to kill the individual but he still almost did as he hadn't called MD / PD or went into Mission Row which is quite litellary right infront of him, Mr.Rahul had left the male with no medical care and he didn'tt know if he got treated or not, If the injured male hadn't called EMS he would've died.

      In Summary:

      Officer Abdullah responded to a call from Alex Kent, who reported being shot by a Moonbeam Taxi driver, identified as Mr. Rahul. Upon locating the Moonbeam Taxi and talking to Mr. Rahul, he admitted to shooting someone in self-defense and not reporting the incident to the police.

      Considering the circumstances and Mr. Rahul's admission, the decision to charge him with SF03 - Involuntary or Vehicular Manslaughter seems to be based on the belief that while Mr. Rahul acted in self-defense, his actions were still considered negligent. The charge reflects the notion that injuring the individual without calling MD or PD would be considered allegedly leaving the person to die even though it's a self-defence act but he still hasn't reported it, and since Mr. Rahul left the scene without calling MD/PD, he had no information about the victim's status, implying a lack of due care for the injured party.

      Key factors supporting this charge include Mr. Rahul's failure to report the incident to the police or seek medical assistance promptly, even though Mission Row Precinct was infront of him. This lack of immediate response or engagement with law enforcement might be interpreted as a negligent act, aligning with the charge of involuntary or vehicular manslaughter.

      From the officer's perspective, the charge seems appropriate given the circumstances of the self-defense claim, the failure to immediately report the incident, and the potential violation of safety legislation. The officer must consider the available evidence and the law to determine the most suitable charge that reflects the nature of the incident, including the uncertainty about the victim's well-being due to Mr. Rahul leaving without informing MD/PD.

      BODYCAM Footage of Officer Abdullah arriving on scene of the injured Alex Kent - BODYCAM Footage #1
      BODYCAM Footage of Officer Abdullah and fellow Officers conducting a Traffic Stop on Mr.Rahul Akbar, detaining him and asking him if conesnt to a search for the vehicle. - BODYCAM Footage #2
      BODYCAM Footage of Officer Abdullah's talk with Mr.Rahul after cuffing and marindarizing. - BODYCAM Footage #3

      ((Proof of BODYCAM RP for Officer Abdullah)) - ((https://i.imgur.com/UdL5CYM.png))
      ((Proof of DASHCAM RP for Mr.Rahul's DASHCAM)) - ((https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ ... 8f5f52e6d0&))
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Mohamed Abdullah, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Image
      Mohamed Abdullah
      Police Officer III
      Los Santos Police Department

      Date: 01/FEB/2024
    Image
  • Exhibit #3: Cole Harper Witness statement, LSPD
    Spoiler
    18/unknown.png[/img]

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 30/JAN/2024
    Witness Information
    • Name: Cole Harper
      Date of Birth: 17/JUL/2000
      Phone Number: 590-3375
      Occupation: Cadet, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • I, Cadet Cole Harper, on 30/JAN/2024 was having my Field Patrol Session conducted by Police Officer II Dutch Kon. During my session I specifically asked of I could get some personal practice with my 10-55's (TRAFFIC STOPS) to which my partner at the time agreed to help with. While clearing from Mission Row Police Department, we've noticed Yellow Moonbeam passing by, to which my partner, Dutch Kon contacted someone on the radio proclaiming that we see a vehicle that has been on a lookout and we are conducting a traffic stop immediately. I've turned my vehicle lights on and vehicle stopped instantly and parked on the sidewalk. After calling out the traffic stop via police radio frequency, my partner Dutch Kon took over the traffic stop since I have not been informed about the ongoing investigation.

      The Driver, Rahul Akbar, was very cooperative and agreed with everything he was asked to do, warned us about a firearm inside his vehicle and agreed to a pat-down. ( Police Officer II Dutch Kon Mirandized the person before conducting any search on the person).

      During the investigation I was tasked with ensuring the safety of the area while Police Officer III Mohamed Abdullah and Police Officer II Dutch Kon conducted an investigation and I, Cadet Cole Harper, had absolute minimal contact with Rahul Akbar. Around an hour later, Police Officer III Mohamed Abdullah registered the charges and allowed us to transport the person to Department of Correction (DOC) .

      At DOC , Rahul Akbars was attacked with a Shotgun by a third-party civilian who had a feud with the aforementioned person, but his health was stabilized and he promptly handed over to DOC guards on-duty.

      I've personally filled out an arrest report on Rahul Akbar with cooperation with my partner Police Officer II Dutch Kon in order to get some practice on my bureaucracy skill-set.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Cole Harper, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,
      Image
      Cole Harper
      Cadet
      Los Santos Police Department

      Date: 02/FEB/2024
    Image
  • Exhibit #4: Dutch Kon Witness Statement, LSPD
    Spoiler
    18/unknown.png[/img]

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 01/JAN/2000
    Witness Information
    • Name: Dutch Kon
      Date of Birth: 20/JAN/1980
      Phone Number: NA
      Occupation: POII, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • I had heard a call over the radio to which we were looking for a blue and yellow taxi van. The van driver had been previously accused in a 911 call for shooting an unarmed person at MRPD for unknown reasons. While pulling out of MRPD we seen the van drive by so we pulled it over and called it out over the radio. Another officer arrived, along with a few more and conducted an investigation. Once the investigation had been complete, my cadet and myself was asked to transport the individual to DOC for them. Upon transferring the inmate to DOC for the charges placed on him, we were held up with a shotgun outside the front of DOC. I tried to negotiate with the armed man to let us go, but he eventually shot and injured mr. Akbar. After transporting mr. Akbar to Pillbox for treatment, he was then lodged into DOC for his crimes. We were told beforehand, that he had shot an unarmed individual for hitting him after he had followed the man for quite sometime. The man told Mr. Akbar multiple times to stop following him but Mr. Akbar continued as he believed the man had taken something from his cab. Eventually the man had hit/kicked Mr. Akbar so he pulled out his firearm. He shot the man or shot at the man and then fled the seen in his vehicle. He returned some time later after speaking to his DCC manager to go file a report on the discharge of the firearm and the crime that he believe had happened.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I,Dutch Kon, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Image
      Dutch Kon
      POII
      Los Santos Police Department

      Date: 01/JAN/2000
    Image
  • Exhibit #5: Rahul Akbar Priors, LSPD
    Spoiler
    Image
    lspdlogo

    Los Santos Police Department
    Legal Affairs Division, Office of the Chief
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"
    LEGALLY PRIVILEGED

    • Attorney @Al Triton,

      At the time of the incident Rahul Akbar did have a valid firearms permit, as attached.
      Rahul Akbar PRIORS
      Image
      A. PERSONAL INFORMATION
      • A1. Full Name: Rahul Akbar

        A2. Date of Birth: 02/JUN/1967 (i.e. 07/JAN/1997)
        A3. Phone Number: 2173552
        A4. Residence Address: N/A

        A5. Please attach a photocopy of your driver's licenses *Example*: A6. Is your record clear of Level Four charges? Yes, I spoke to some police officers who told me I have none above Level Four.
        A7. Is your record 6 months clear of Level Three charges? Yes
        A8. Is your record 3 months clear of Level Two charges? Yes
        A9. Is your record 1 month clear of Level One charges? Yes
        A10. Was your firearms license revoked within the past month? No
      B. DESCRIPTION OF WEAPONS
      • B1. Why do you wish to own a personal firearm license? (If selecting a Flare Gun please additionally explain the reasoning for this)
        • I have realized that San Andreas is a pretty dangerous place. I especially realized that when I previously worked for Downtown Cab, Co. I am thinking about applying for a job there again and would like a firearm for my own protection as I had some close calls driving dangerous people. I don't intend to hurt people, I don't even think I will ever fire my weapon, I will probably keep it unloaded all the time. But just the "threat" it has against criminals stops them from even trying to do something according to several of my previous colleagues.
        B2. Which firearms do you wish to be licensed for? (You may select up to 2)
        Mark each box by changing [cb] to [cbc]
        • Double-Action Revolver
          Heavy Revolver
          Heavy Revolver Mk II
          Navy Revolver
          Pistol
          Pistol Mk II
          Pistol .50
          Heavy Pistol
          Combat Pistol
          SNS Pistol
          SNS Pistol Mk II
          Flare Gun
        B3. How do you plan on storing your personal firearm(s) when they are not on your person?
        • I don't have a residence. However, I do own a small safe container meant for firearms which will be locked and placed in my glovebox. The weapon will also be unloaded and put on "safety" at all times when not on my person. Additionally, the glovebox will be locked as well as my car. The car I am planning on using has the license plate QLDKMZVE.
      C. RULES AND RESTRICTIONS
      • The licensee is responsible for all liability for, injury to, or death of any person, or damage to any property which may result through any act or omission of either the licensee or the agency that issued the license. In the event any claim, suit, or action is brought against the agency that issued the license, its chief officer, or any of its employees, by reason of, or in connection with any such act or omission, the licensee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the agency that issued the license, its chief officer or any of its employees from such claim, suit, or action.

        The licensee authorizes the licensing agency to investigate, as they deem necessary, the licensee's record and character to ascertain any and all information which may concern his/her qualifications and justification to be issued a license to carry a personal firearm and release said agency of any and all liability arising out of such investigation.

        I hereby certify under penalties of providing a false statement that the answers I have given are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I understand and agree to the provisions, conditions, and restrictions herein or otherwise imposed.

        I hereby declare that I have read and understood the Requirements & Regulations and understand the consequences that follow should I violate them.

        C1. Signature: Rahul Akbar
        C2. Date Signed: 20/JAN/2024
      D. (( OUT-OF-CHARACTER INFORMATION ))
      • D1. Please upload a screenshot of your admin logs and character names *Example*:D2. Do you understand that applying for a firearms license for the sole purpose of delivering weapons to any of your other characters or friends of your other characters constitutes as metagaming & is also a violation of Eclipse RP's OOC trading/RMT rule?
        Yes.
      Image

    • Sincerely,
      Image
      Police Lieutenant II Mike Luigi
      Commanding Officer, Legal Affairs Division
      Los Santos Police Department
    Image
  • Exhibit #7: 9-1-1 Call Log, LSPD
    Spoiler
    Image
  • Michael Blaise
    Junior Prosecuting Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 552-8150 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio McFornell
Posts: 1860
Joined: 23 Apr 2022, 22:24
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

#24-CM-0039, State of San Andreas v. Rahul Akbar

A decision was reached in the above case on the 13th day of July, 2024.


The Court will be granting the defence's motion for involuntary dismissal as the defence has had no contact with the defendant.

The charges will remain on the defendants record and they will be required to pay $25,000 in Court fees.

So ordered,
Image
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Retired Supreme Court Justice
Retired Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Retired Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Formal Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest