To whom it may concern,
John Texas wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 10:37 am
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Prosecution Division
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
- Dear Attorney Coast,
I hope this email finds you well. I am glad to see you have settled into a new position within our legal world and I am glad to see you've continued as a Defense Attorney.
I'm reaching out regarding John Pauls case to provide a brief overview of the case and the evidence we have.
Please find each charge with a brief explanation of the evidence we have.
- GM04 - Resisting Arrest
- We have body-cam footage of your client fleeing on foot from Police and being tazed and arrested.
- Accessory to GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
- We have dash-cam footage and several witness statements showing your client was present inside a vehicle (Jester) which actively was involved in directing cruisers onto spike strips as another pursuit was going on, directly assisting the main vehicle being pursued. He gets an accessory charge for being in the vehicle, but this can be dropped as I'm not interested in pinning John to crimes he hasn't directly committed.
- VM06 -Street Competition
- Same footage that shows the pursuit also shows your client inside the same vehicle (Jester) at an unlawful gathering where vehicles are doing burnouts, donuts and drifts as well as blocking intersections. Again, he wasn't the driver so not to bothered about dropping this either.
- GM13 - Criminal Threats of a Gov. Employee
- Footage shows your client threatening his arresting Officer's life during the arrest process.
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- Sort of implied from the above. Footage obviously shows your client inside the vehicle as it evades this combined with no effort from your client to exit the vehicle + resisting arrest makes this charge solid.
- NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
- This is for the initial gathering where several vehicles, including the one your client was in, who willingly met up and decided to make a circle as several vehicles then proceeded to do burnouts, drifts and donuts on public property.
I'll get straight to it, this case is open and shut and we have plenty of evidence. But, there are charges here that are weaker as mentioned and I for one am not looking to drag this on at trial.
As such, please consider this as a plea deal offer. We will drop
- Accessory to GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
- VM06 -Street Competition
in exchange for a guilty plea for
- GM04 - Resisting Arrest
- GM13 - Criminal Threats of a Gov. Employee
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
Respectfully,
John Texas
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 348-8450 — [email protected]
DISCLAIMER: This message, including attachments, is confidential and may contain information protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
The prosecuting attorney on this case emailed my old attorney, David Coast. He mentioned multiple times about "dash-cam footage" and "body-cam footage", So is the prosecution telling me that this footage just disappeared, fell out of the world?
May I remind the prosecution that they have a constitutional obligation to provide everything they have about this case, even it it benefits the defense.
Section 6: Establishment of the Office of the Attorney General & Prosecutor’s Office wrote:
In the event that the Prosecutor’s Office discovers evidence that may be beneficial to the defendant, they will be obliged to present it to the docket.
Now if he was lying wouldn't that be a violation of the Code of Ethics, particularly "V - Relationship to the Adverse Party " section A?
V - Relationship to the Adverse Party wrote:
An attorney shall treat the adverse party in a considerate and objective way, trying to establish the conditions for the dispute to be solved as soon as possible and in the mutual interest of the parties.
Due to all of this I would also like to request another 3 days to work on any motions I have to do with the discovery, due to all my defense attorneys running away alongside the fact I have only taken the steps to represent myself a mere day ago.
In this time I also would like the opportunity to work out a plea deal with the prosecution, since my Attorney David Coast and Attorney John Texas came to an agreement, of which was completely overlooked when my legal representation was taken into custody for terrorism.
May I remind the prosecution that falling back on a plea deal just because I have chosen to represent myself could be a violation of the Code of Ethics.
V - Relationship to the Adverse Party wrote:
An attorney shall not exploit the ignorance, error or intimidation of the adverse party, particularly if the party does not have a legal representative, in order to achieve unjust success for his or her own party.
Respectfully,
John Chapel
Head Spokesperson
Friends with Ex Bar Certified Attorney