Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Tony Cabanna
Defendant Phone: 507-5758
Defendant Address: 3. Alta St. 49
(( Defendant Discord: easy#6685 ))
Requested Attorney: N/A

Charging Department: SD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 05/FEB/2023 at 07:45
Charge(s):

• WN01 - Unlawful Brandishing of a Firearm

Narrative:
I was arrested and taken to mission row on 05/FEB/2023. While I do admit to unlawfully branshing my firearm I did do it in a private area while citizens were not even a mile close to us. I am a trained weapons handler and I knew I was not going to injure anyone. We were also having target practice conducting sports shooting which is legal in a private property. All parties consented and costs were going to be covered.

---

I, Tony Cabanna, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  I, Deputy Chief Public Defender Cyrus Raven, will be representing the defendant, Tony Cabanna, in this case. I will be making contact with the defendant. I am ready to proceed at the court's discretion.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  
  
  Deputy Chief Public Defender
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  5356160 — [email protected]

---

• Re: State of San Andreas v. Tony Cabanna
  
  To whom it may concern,
  
  The Los Santos Police Department's Legal Affairs Unit would like to highlight that the charging department involved in this case is the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department and not the Los Santos Police Department as the defendant has stated in their submission.

---

• Kind Regards,
  
  Deputy Chief of Police Scott Dunbar
  Officer-In-Charge, Legal Affairs Unit
  Los Santos Police Department

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Roderick Marchisio, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.
  
  I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

---

Respectfully,


Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

• To Whom It May Concern,
  
  I, Junior Prosecuting Attorney Gregory Kumerow, will be co-counseling with Deputy Attorney Roderick Marchisio, and will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Junior Prosecuting Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 219-6537 — [email protected]

---

---

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Voluntary Dismissal

To whom it may concern,

• We the Defense in the case below are requesting a voluntary dismissal from the court, please find the reason for it below.

  ---

  State of San Andreas v. Tony Cabanna
  Assigned Court Case Number: N/A
  Requesting Party: Cyrus Raven
  Party Members: Tony Cabanna, Cyrus Raven

  ---

  Voluntary Dismissal: Defendant no longer wishes to pursue this appeal.

  ---

  Detailed explanation:
  
  The Defendant has expressed his right to drop this appeal before the case has been activated.

  ---

  Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,


Cyrus Raven
Deputy Chief Public Defender

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  During the Discovery investigation process, the Prosecution has received information that will most likely lead us to pursue additional charges against the Defendant. As such, taking into account the principles of due process that the courts should adhere, the Prosecution objects against the Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of the Defense and will be awaiting activation of the underlying case.

---

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  As the prosecution is well aware, it is the Defendant's right to no longer pursue an appeal before it is activated by the superior court. To be clear, the motion for voluntary dismissal is a courtesy and serves as a notice rather than a request. It is not the Defendant or the Defense's concern what charges the prosecution might further pursue, they have avenues to follow if they wish to indict.
  
  The Defendant is no longer pursuing this appeal.
  
  See State of San Andreas v. Tyreece Williams
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Cyrus Raven
  Deputy Chief Public Defender
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  5356160 — [email protected]

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  As the Prosecution has indicated, it is our belief that the Defendant has committed crimes that will be pursued. With reference to the State of San Andreas v. Tyreece Williams case, it is evident that the Prosecution in that case had no objections to the case being dismissed. As such, it is in our opinion now to the court whether they would like to dismiss this case before us starting a separate indictment up, thus breaking principles of due process as well as wasting additional resources (read: taxpayers' money) or simply continue on the docket that is already existing and has been received officially by the court.

---

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  This case shall be dismissed with the defendant's decision to no longer pursue the dispute of charges.
  
  Despite the fact that this case has been received by the court, it is not yet been activated and the prosecution is not entitled to file any Motion to Amend Charges to this specific case. This, however, does not bar the prosecution from seeking an indictment of the defendant on any crimes alleged, but this will have to be done through the normal process for prosecution initiated cases.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]