#23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Locked
Anakin Nixon
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu May 27, 2021 11:45 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Pousey Nixon

#23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Anakin Nixon »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Anakin Nixon
Defendant Phone: 4774505
Defendant Address: none
(( Defendant Discord: DatSquirrel#2962 ))
Requested Attorney: N/A

Image
Charging Department: Los Santos Sheriffs Department

Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 22/12/2022 04:12
Charge(s):
  • possession of an illegal substance while in possession of a firearm, tampering with evidence

Narrative:
I got pulled over for not paying tickets off after 3 days and had a warrant out for my arrest, to which I did comply to. While the Deputy Carolin Rose was asking me to step out to cuff me I proceeded to take an aspirin for a terrible headache I had before going to serve some time which I do believe is reasonable. After the fact they called MD to come and test me for any foreign substances. The test did come up positive for LSD but that does not mean that I took the drug in front of the officer or on that day, drugs last some time in your system and its not like I was planning on getting drug tested. I explained to them my case and they all kept accusing me of taking illegal substances. I have been a positive member to the community and the city, I have never had a felony or any prior drug charges and have always kept my nose clean, I have worked at DCC for 10 months at the least, and they have strict policies and I believe it shows that I am someone who is a responsible individual and wouldn't do such a reckless thing at this time especially working towards getting into management, I wasn't disrespectful to any of the officers and respect them for doing their jobs.





I, Anakin Nixon, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Last edited by Anakin Nixon on Thu Dec 22, 2022 9:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To whom it may concern,

    The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Roderick Marchisio, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.

    I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

Respectfully,


Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1966
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on 25 December, 2022.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
Online
User avatar
Shaun Harper
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:33 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Shaun Harper »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Edward Greeg
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Colt Daniels,

    I, Public Defense Attorney Shaun Harper, will be representing the defendant Anakin Nixon in this case.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Public Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 308-7889 — [email protected]
Marty Millionaire
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2020 5:53 am
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Marty Millionaire »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v.
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Colt Daniels,


    I, Junior Defense Attorney Marty Millionaire, will be co-counseling with Public Defense Attorney Shaun Harper representing the defendant Anakin Nixon in this case.


    Respectfully,

    Image
    Junior Public Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 450-3722 — [email protected]
Chief Loan Officer Marty Millionaire
Amount of loans given out (to date).
=
$3,071,000
Ashcroft Financial"Making Dreams come True"
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
#23-CM-0032

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on the 5th of March, 2023.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon is hereby activated by this Court under #23-CM-0032.

Both the State and Defendant have adequate representation in the case, as such, immediately following this notice, the Presiding Judge will be filing the Order for Discovery.


Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
#23-CM-0032

A court order was entered in the above case on the 5th of March, 2023.


The case of the #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.



Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Mason,

  • We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
    State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
    Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0032
    Requesting Party: N/A
    Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
    Exhibit #1: Arrest Report Anakin Nixon
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical Evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery The arrest report as provided by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department gives insight into the situation that led to the arrest of the Defendant. First of all, the Deputy indicates that the initial reason for pulling the Defendant over was an active warrant for his arrest. The Deputy further notes that upon asking the Defendant to step out of their vehicle, they were seen taking a substance into their body before stepping out, with the Deputy's suspicion this could very well be LSD. The LSEMS were called and tested the Defendant, upon which they tested positive for both LSD and Steroids. The Deputy finally notes that the Defendant was in possession of two legal pistols at the time and subsequently arrested the Defendant for these chain of events.
    • Image
      ARREST REPORT
      MUGSHOT
      SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
      • Full Name: Anakin Nixon
        Telephone Number: 477-4505
        Licenses Revoked: Yes
        • Weapon
        Charges:
        • GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
        • DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed
        • GM16 - Failure to Pay a Fine
        How did the suspect plea to the above charges?
        Suspect pleaded not guilty to all charges.
        Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
      VEHICLES INVOLVED
      • Vehicle A:
      DEPUTY DETAILS
      • Full Name: Carolin Rose
        Badge Number: 24140
        Callsign: 12-R-15
      INCIDENT DETAILS
      • Date of Arrest: 2022-12-22
        Deputies Involved: Investigator I Jeremy Williams / Master Deputy Jett Jones / Master Deputy Thomas Dawson

        Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
        • Initial Stop
          I had checked the warrants list during patrol and saw Anakin Nixon's name on the list. I looked up his name and saw he had an active charge for Failure to Pay a Fine.

          Around 30 minutes I witnessed Anakin Nixon driving his Yellow XLS taxi at Bayview so I turned my lights on and started a 10-55.

          I approached the vehicle and got the drivers license who was identified as Anakin Nixon. At that point I asked him to step out of the vehicle, he gave me a hard time about getting out of the vehicle, he would eventually take a substance that appeared to be LSD before stepping out.

          When he stepped out I put him into cuffs and searched him where I found nothing illegal currently on him.

          The Investigation
          Upon seeing him take something in the driver seat before getting out I had a suspicion it was LSD.

          I pulled my bodycam footage and investigated it which furthered my suspicion, I also went and showed it to Jeremy Williams and Thomas Dawson who both agreed it was probably LSD.

          We called MD down to the stop to perform a drug test, they would arrive and do a drug test that would come back positive for LSD and Steroids.

          At that point I felt positive he took LSD and added a Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed as he was carrying 2 legal pistols on him and Tampering with evidence for consuming the LSD.

          I then loaded him up into my cruiser and took him to DOC where he served his time.

          **Submitted a Firearm License Removal Request as well**
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Exhibit A: Bodycam Footage
        Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)
        Image
      ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
      Image

      Image
    Exhibit #2: Bodycam Footage Carolin Rose
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical Evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery The bodycam footage of the Deputy shows the situation that led to the arrest and subsequent charges of the Defendant.
    Exhibit #3: Witness Statement Carolin Rose
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical Evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery The witness statement as provided by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department gives insight into the situation that led to the arrest of the Defendant. First of all, the Deputy indicates that the initial reason for pulling the Defendant over was an active warrant for his arrest. The Deputy further notes that upon asking the Defendant to step out of their vehicle, they were seen taking a substance into their body before stepping out, with the Deputy's suspicion this could very well be LSD. The Deputy indicates that after reviewing the bodycam footage, this was determined to be LSD, as can be seen on the bodycam as provided in evidence exhibit #2. The LSEMS were called and tested the Defendant, upon which they tested positive for both LSD and Steroids. The Deputy finally notes that the Defendant was subsequently arrested the Defendant for these chain of events.
    • Image

      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Official Witness Statement
      "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
      Case Information
      • Case Number: [N/A]
        Incident Date: [22/DEC/2022]
      Witness Information
      • Name: [Carolin Rose]
        Date of Birth: [21/JUL/1997]
        Phone Number: [251-6826]
        Occupation: [Deputy Sheriff II]
      Witness Statement
      • [When I first clocked on for my standard daily patrol and opened my Warrants List on the MDC, I saw "Anakin Nixon" on the list. Later in that same patrol, I was at Bayview checking up on employees when I saw Anakin Nixon in his taxi. I remembered he was on the Warrants List, so I conducted a 10-55 on him. I did my standard procedure for a 10-55 and approached his vehicle.

        Upon asking Anakin to step out of the vehicle and informing him he was gonna be under arrest he would appear panicked, and semi non-compliant and stalling his way out of the vehicle. This would go on for about a minute or so of me arguing with Anakin telling him he will be under arrest and has to step out of the vehicle. He would continue to be panicked and non-compliant and would eventually throw something into his mouth, digest it, then step out of the vehicle.

        I would conduct my standard arrest procedure on Anakin, placing him in cuffs, reading him his rights, searching him, and removing his legal firearm. From there, I would place him into my cruiser while, Investigator I Jeremy Williams and Master Deputy Thomas Dawson did some more investigating into the matter of what he put into his mouth.

        I removed my bodycams SD card and started to review the footage with both Williams and Dawson. Upon getting to the point where Mr. Nixon threw something into his mouth we all collectively agreed that it very much appeared to be a drug known as "LSD".

        From there, we gave MD a call over Department Radio and had one of their individuals come down to give Anakin a drug test. Once the drug test was taken it was found he came back positive for not only LSD but Steroids as well.

        From here, I would take Anakin Nixon to DOC where DOC took over custody of him and processed him. ]
      Witness Affirmation
      • I, [Carolin Rose], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

        Signed,

        Image
        [Carolin Rose]
        [Deputy Sheriff II]
        [Los Santos Sheriffs Department]

        Date: [06/DEC/2023]
      Image


Sincerely,


Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Motion to Amend Charges
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Amend Charges

Honorable Mason,

  • We the Prosecution in the case are requesting an amendment of the charges.
    State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
    Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0032
    Requesting Party: Prosecution
    Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
    Original Charges:
    • GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
    • DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed
    Amended Charges:
    • GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
    • DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed
    • GF24 - Perjury

    Detailed explanation:

    The Prosecution notes that the Criminal Case Submission Form is an official statement, which has to be signed with the affirmation that, and we quote:
    all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines
    With reference to the aforementioned, the Prosecution notes that as per the Defendants' narrative under oath as submitted to the court, the Defendant has knowingly and willingly made numerous clearly untrue statements in this official statement to mislead the court in this trial. In this respect, the Prosecution notes to the following sentences:
    • "While the Deputy Carolin Rose was asking me to step out to cuff me I proceeded to take an aspirin for a terrible headache I had before going to serve some time which I do believe is reasonable." - please refer to previously presented evidence exhibits.
    • "The test did come up positive for LSD but that does not mean that I took the drug in front of the officer or on that day, drugs last some time in your system and its not like I was planning on getting drug tested." - please refer to previously presented evidence exhibits.
    • "... have always kept my nose clean" - again, please refer to previously presented evidence exhibits.
    The Prosecution notes that in case the Prosecution had not been able to present the abundantly clear evidence as kindly provided by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department as previously presented to the Court, these false statements by the Defendant, which are in a direct relation to this trial, would at the very least have had the potential to affect the outcome of the trial. As such, the Prosecution can only conclude that the action of knowingly and willingly providing these false statements to the court should only result in the application of the charge GF24 - Perjury.

Sincerely,


Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
Online
User avatar
Shaun Harper
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:33 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Shaun Harper »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

State of San Andreas v.
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Judith Mason,

    We the defense do not have any objections towards the Motion for Discovery or the Motion to Amend Charges and are ready to proceed.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Senior Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 308-7889 — [email protected]
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Motion for Summary Judgment
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Summary Judgment

Honorable Mason,

  • We the Prosecution in the case below are requesting a summary judgment.
    State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
    Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0032
    Requesting Party: Prosecution
    Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
    Reasoning: The facts in the underlying case are clear.
    Detailed explanation:

    In the evidence as presented to the court in the Motion for Discovery dated March 5, 2023, it has become clear that the Defendant:
    • 1. Took LSD before stepping out of their vehicle during the traffic stop and as such, tampered with evidence. This becomes further clear when analyzing the bodycam footage, in which the Defendant is clearly trying to lead the Deputy away from the vehicle to do so;
    • 2. Therefore also was in possession of a controlled substance while armed; and
    • 3. Committed perjury as per the arguments listed in the Motion to Amend Charges above.
    As such, the Prosecution is requesting a summary judgment in favour of the Prosecution and declare the Defendant guilty on all accounts, saving all parties involved the resources of going to trial.

    Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,


Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
Online
User avatar
Shaun Harper
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:33 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Shaun Harper »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

State of San Andreas v.
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Judith Mason,

    We the defense do not have any objections towards the Motion for Summary Judgment and are ready to proceed.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Senior Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 308-7889 — [email protected]
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
#23-CM-0032

A decision was reached in the above case on the 6th day of March, 2023.


The Motion for Discovery, Motion to Amend Charges, and the Motion for Summary Judgment are all hereby granted. The charges of this case are now GF16 - Tampering with Evidence, DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed, and GF24 - Perjury.

At this point, I will allow the prosecution and defense to present arguments and counter-arguments for why the court should rule in their favor in relation to the Summary Judgment. Each party will be permitted an initial response and a counter argument against the assertions made in the opposing party's initial response. Once both responses have been submitted to the court, a verdict shall be issued.


Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Mason,

    The Defendant is being prosecuted for three charges: GF16 - Tampering with Evidence, DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed and GF24 - Perjury.

    In relation to the charges GF16 - Tampering with Evidence and DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed, the Prosecution notes evidence exhibits #1, #2 and #3.
    Evidence exhibit #1, the arrest report as provided by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department, gives insight into the situation that led to the arrest of the Defendant. First of all, the Deputy indicates that the initial reason for pulling the Defendant over was an active warrant for his arrest. The Deputy further notes that upon asking the Defendant to step out of their vehicle, they were seen taking a substance into their body before stepping out, with the Deputy's suspicion this could very well be LSD. The LSEMS were called and tested the Defendant, upon which they tested positive for both LSD and Steroids. The Deputy finally notes that the Defendant was in possession of two legal pistols at the time and subsequently arrested the Defendant for these chain of events.
    Evidence exhibit #2, the bodycam footage of the Deputy, shows the situation that led to the arrest and subsequent charges of the Defendant. In specific, the Prosecution notes the clear attempts of the Defendant to lead the Deputy away from the vehicle before taking LSD right in front of her before stepping out.
    Evidence exhibit #3, the witness statement as provided by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department, gives further insight into the situation that led to the arrest of the Defendant. First of all, the Deputy indicates that the initial reason for pulling the Defendant over was an active warrant for his arrest. The Deputy further notes that upon asking the Defendant to step out of their vehicle, they were seen taking a substance into their body before stepping out, with the Deputy's suspicion this could very well be LSD. The Deputy indicates that after reviewing the bodycam footage, this was determined to be LSD, as can be seen on the bodycam as provided in evidence exhibit #2. The LSEMS were called and tested the Defendant, upon which they tested positive for both LSD and Steroids. The Deputy finally notes that the Defendant was subsequently arrested the Defendant for these chain of events.

    Taking the aforementioned into account, the Prosecution can only conclude the Defendant had indeed been in possession of a controlled substance, namely LSD, while possessing a (albeit legal) firearm as well as clearly concealing and destroying evidence with the intent to interfere with the lawful investigation of the officer, that very obvously would have included the searching of the Defendant upon arrest. As such, the Prosecution can only conclude these actions should lead to the application of the charges GF16 - Tampering with Evidence and DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed.

    Further, the Prosecution notes that the Criminal Case Submission Form is an official statement, which has to be signed with the affirmation that, and we quote:
    all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines
    With reference to the aforementioned, the Prosecution notes that as per the Defendants' narrative under oath as submitted to the court, the Defendant has knowingly and willingly made numerous clearly untrue statements in this official statement to mislead the court in this trial. In this respect, the Prosecution notes to the following sentences:
    • "While the Deputy Carolin Rose was asking me to step out to cuff me I proceeded to take an aspirin for a terrible headache I had before going to serve some time which I do believe is reasonable." - please refer to previously presented evidence exhibits.
    • "The test did come up positive for LSD but that does not mean that I took the drug in front of the officer or on that day, drugs last some time in your system and its not like I was planning on getting drug tested." - please refer to previously presented evidence exhibits.
    • "... have always kept my nose clean" - again, please refer to previously presented evidence exhibits.
    The Prosecution notes that in case the Prosecution had not been able to present the abundantly clear evidence as kindly provided by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department as previously presented to the Court, these false statements by the Defendant, which are in a direct relation to this trial, would at the very least have had the potential to affect the outcome of the trial. As such, the Prosecution can only conclude that the action of knowingly and willingly providing these false statements to the court should only result in the application of the charge GF24 - Perjury.

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
Online
User avatar
Shaun Harper
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:33 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Shaun Harper »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

State of San Andreas v.
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Judith Mason,

    We the defense do not have any objections towards the statement made by the prosecution.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Senior Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 308-7889 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Attorney Harper,

    Does the defense wish to present any form of argument in response to the prosecution's assertions?

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
Online
User avatar
Shaun Harper
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:33 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Shaun Harper »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

State of San Andreas v.
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Judith Mason,

    We the defense do not have any arguments in response to the prosecution's assertions.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Senior Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 308-7889 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon
#23-CM-0032

A decision was reached in the above case on the 16th day of March, 2023.


The case of #23-CM-0032, State of San Andreas v. Anakin Nixon has been resolved.

On the 22nd of December, 2022, deputies with the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department were conducting routine patrols in the Paleto Bay area. Having somewhat recently checked the active warrant list for the State of San Andreas, a deputy witnessed the defendant, Anakin Nixon, operating a vehicle at Bayview Auto Center. Upon pulling the vehicle over for a traffic stop, Mr. Nixon was informed of an active charge for GM16 - Failure to Pay a Fine, which had been applied to his record approximately 14 hours prior by another law enforcement officer.

During the subsequent investigation, Mr. Nixon appeared agitated, wishing to direct the attention of the deputy away from the situation at hand, causing a suspicion that there might be more to the story. After slight resistance to the deputy's commands, Mr. Nixon stated, "Alright, but I'm a legal employee and I have to do this," before placing what appeared to be Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, commonly known as LSD, into his mouth. The defendant then stepped out of the vehicle and was placed into custody.

Deputies on scene further investigated and reviewed body-camera footage, and obtained additional opinions on what exactly the defendant had ingested before a member of the Los Santos Emergency Medical Services was dispatched to the location for a drug test, which had allegedly come back positive for both Lysergic Acid Diethylamide and Anabolic Steroids.

The court has determined that the defendant's request to give his passenger "some things" in addition to the defendant's insistence that the deputy divert attention away from the situation show highly suspicious behavior, which is then taken a step further by the defendant ingesting what appeared to be Lysergic Acid Diethylamide. This action is viewed by the court as tampering with evidence as the defendant is effectively destroying the evidence that was liable for seizure upon the defendant's arrest.

While the court cannot determine whether or not the substance ingested was, in fact, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, the court has determined there to be sufficient evidence that the defendant had been in possession of a controlled substance while armed, given the defendant's suspicious behavior immediately before the ingestion, the body-camera footage having displayed what appears to be Lysergic Acid Diethylamide according to multiple members of law enforcement, and the results of the drug test having revealed positive results for Lysergic Acid Diethylamide and Anabolic Steroids, both of which are controlled substances.

The court has determined that the defendant's insistence, on the public docket, that the substance he had ingested had been an aspirin is a false statement, signed by the defendant under penalty of perjury, and is made in an effort to mislead the court in making a proper determination in this case.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
  • On the count of DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed, I find the defendant, Anakin Nixon, guilty.
  • On the count of GF16 - Tampering with Evidence, I find the defendant, Anakin Nixon, guilty.
  • On the count of GF24 - Perjury, I find the defendant, Anakin Nixon, guilty.


Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests