#23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Scoobie Bathsheba
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 2:21 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Kazjii

#23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Scoobie Bathsheba »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: WIZARD PROPHET SCOOBIE EMERSON BATHSHEBA THE II OF DEER ISLE
Defendant Phone: 479-9868
Defendant Address: BATHSHEBA CHURCH
(( Defendant Discord: Kaz#9659 ))
Requested Attorney: SYRIS RAYVAN
Image
Charging Department: SHAREOF DUHPARTMENT
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 12/DEC/2022 03:47
Charge(s):
  • Evaydang a offisar
Narrative:
Due to Scoobie's disability, I (Uncle Prophet Jemimah) will be his ghost writer for this explanation as the narrative is told to me by Scoobie.

Scoobie outlines the situation as very similar to his most recent court case where he was never ID'd and the Sheriff's Deputy that charged him said "you said XYZ" without ever getting his license. He mentions that when attempting to talk to "Viccy", Viccy kept running away after giving him false information as to what happened.

They kept saying that Scoobie got out of the car and hit Viccys car and then told all the Bathshebas to get back in the Bathsheba-mobile. What actually had happen which was neglected by all law enforcement officers on scene was: Scoobie did not leave the backseat of the Bathsheba-Mobile, Scoobie did not encourage any Bathsheba to get back into the Bathsheba-mobile -> he actually encouraged all the Bathshebas to comply and for Wolfgang to calm down, Scoobie was still in the Bathsheba-mobile when everyone got back in when the car then took off for the pursuit in which he told the driver (who was not caught and escaped by foot), when the car crashed he got out and ran for fear but that is it.

They never got Scoobie's ID until they had him in custody, yet charged him with Evading an Officer even though Scoobie was not driving, Scoobie begged the driver to stop, and Scoobie informed everyone that he tried getting the driver to stop. Scoobie was never ID'd and was charged for "sounding" like someone in the car that told the Bathsheba's to get into the vehicle to evade which was someone else that will not be named.



I, WIZARD PROPHET SCOOBIE EMERSON BATHSHEBA THE II OF DEER ISLE, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: State of San Andreas vs Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on 7 December, 2022.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To whom it may concern,

    The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Roderick Marchisio, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.

    I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

Respectfully,


Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Noah Carlile
Commander
Posts: 2200
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2020 12:55 am
ECRP Forum Name: Kazjii

LSEMS Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Noah Carlile »

((Wrong account, again.))

Commander Noah Carlile
Commander of County Wide Operations
Scoobie Bathsheba
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 2:21 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Kazjii

Re: State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Scoobie Bathsheba »

RODORIK I DONUT KNOW IF U CAN REED, BUT I WUNT CYRIUS RAYVEN 2 BE MY LOWYAR, NOT U. PLEEZ REED.

- REEGURDS,

WIZARD PROPHET SCOOBIE EMERSON BATHSHEBA THE II OF DEER ISLE
User avatar
Cyrus Raven
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:14 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Cyrus Raven

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Cyrus Raven »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To whom it may concern,

    I, Deputy Chief Public Defender Cyrus Raven, will be representing the defendant, Scoobie Bathsheba, in this case. I have made myself aware of the contents of this case and have made contact with the defendant. I am ready to proceed at the court's discretion.

    Respectfully,



    Image
    Deputy Chief Public Defender
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    5356160 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on the 6th of February, 2023.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Defendant is hereby activated by this Court under #23-CM-0029.

Both the State and Defendant have adequate representation in the case, as such, immediately following this notice, the Presiding Judge will be filing the Order for Discovery.


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

A court order was entered in the above case on the 6th of February, 2023.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba, #23-CM-0029 is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.




Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Daniels,

    The Prosecution is surprised to learn that the court has issued an Order for Discovery during the leave of absence of the Prosecution and even the Defense in this case. As such, in line with all other active cases in which the leave of absences were taken into account, the Prosecution would like to have confirmed by the court that the additional time for the Discovery will be granted.

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Daniels,

  • We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
    State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
    Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0029
    Requesting Party: N/A
    Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
    Exhibit #1: Arrest Report Scoobie Bathsheba
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery The arrest report of the Defendant as provided by Deputy Vanburen of the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department indicates that the Defendant was arrested following a pursuit that started after the Defendant and other individuals vandalized the police cruiser of the Deputy.
    The Deputy further states that after a short pursuit, the individuals in the vehicle got out of the vehicle and the Deputy ran after one of them, whom he eventually managed to taze. After being taken in custody and detained, the individual was confirmed to be the Defendant, after which he was charged and arrested.
    • Image
      ARREST REPORT
      MUGSHOT
      SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
      • Full Name: Scoobie_Bathsheba
        Telephone Number: 4799868
        Licenses Revoked: No
        Charges:
        • GM04 - Resisting Arrest
        • VF01 - Evading an Officer
        How did the suspect plea to the above charges?
        Suspect pleaded guilty to some of the charges.
        Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
        The suspect was in a gold-colored limo with multiple people
      VEHICLES INVOLVED
      • Vehicle A: Yellow Limo
      DEPUTY DETAILS
      • Full Name: Ike Vanburen
        Badge Number: 19443
        Callsign: 2-D-1
      INCIDENT DETAILS
      • Date of Arrest: 2022-12-06
        Deputies Involved: Captain Mcjohnson, Deputy Carter, Officer Laflour

        Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
        • Captin McJohnson and I Were on a delta patrol on senora Fwy when Scoobie and his gang pulled up beside our cruiser and proceeded to get out and vandalize our cruiser by throwing snowballs and kicking the back of the cruiser, after attempting to stop the vandalism the suspects got back into the Limo and proceeded to evade after following the Limo they decided to stop after a short pursuit evolving PD they Got out of the car and most of them got out and started to run, I followed Scoobie that got out of the drivers seat where they were eventually tazed them and took them into custody after patting them down I ID the person as a Scoobie Bathsheba. After I was done with the search and Miranda rights I escorted him to a PD Cruiser to await an outcome to the situation and let everything get sorted, upon receiving instruction from Captain Mcjohnson I applied the charges of Evading an officer and resisting arrest to Mr.Scoobie. After waiting for DOC to arrive and get the suspects shackled and ready for transport we headed to DOC in an escort. Upon arriving at DOC the suspect was processed and booked at DOC.

          Body Cam:
          Bodycam footage
          NOTE: Please refer to evidence exhibit #2
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Exhibit A:
      ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
      Image Image Deputy Sheriff III Ike Vanburen Trial Operator, Special Enforcement Detail K9 Handler, K9-Unit Field Training Deputy, Field Training Division Field Staff, North Patrol Division Los Santos County Sheriff's Department — "A Tradition of Service"[/center][/img]

      Image
    Exhibit #2: Bodycam footage Victoria McJohnson
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery The footage as received from Captain McJohnson with the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department shows the pursuit itself as well as a total of five individuals leaving the vehicle after the pursuit ended.
    Exhibit #3: Witness Statement Victoria Mcjohnson
    Type of Discovery:
    • Witness Statement
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery The witness statement as provided by Captain Mcjohnson with the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department further shows that after an act of evading an officer in a motor vehicle pursuit, the vehicle was stalled and the driver of the vehicle was being followed by Deputy Vanburen. After a short foot pursuit, the driver was arrested, was read his rights and was identified as the Defendant.
    • Image

      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Official Witness Statement
      "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
      Case Information
      • Case Number: [Case Number]
        Incident Date: [01/JAN/2000]
      Witness Information
      • Name: [Captain Victoria McJohnson]
        Date of Birth: [01/11/1990]
        Phone Number: [###-####]
        Occupation: [LSSD]
      Witness Statement
      • I was the highest deputy on scene and the initiating unit. Please find my arrest report and my partner's down below.
        What was said at the beginning of the situation and who was doing what is irrelevant in this case. What is relevant is that five people exited the Limousine, and five were detained. Two were released, and three were charged. I handled the charges on Timowthee Bathsheba while my partner proceeded with the arrest of Scobbie Bathsheba. The PD units handled Wolfgang Bathseba. The two that were released were named Marvin and Doc. If I recall correctly, they jumped from the vehicle stating that they had nothing to do in this situation and had no idea it would end up in pursuit. As we could not prove otherwise, they were released.

        Mr. Scoobie Bathsheba was lying to us when we were arresting them and seems to continue to do so in this appeal, attempting to confuse us into thinking that we had not caught every Bathsheba and that the driver was able to escape. This can be prove by the dashcam footage from the Brickade. Five people were seen exiting the Limousine, and five people were detained. At no point we lost VC of this limousine so that someone could have jumped out or they could have had time to change the driver.

        When I stated that who was doing what at the beginning of the situation is irrelevant, it is because at the end of this pursuit, Deputy Vanburen went after the driver, ran after him for a bit, detained him, and it was Mr. Scoobie Batsheba. As stated, we suspected that one of the Batshebas hitting our cruiser was Scoobie as we recognized the voice, but no charges were placed until we could confirmed his identity.
      Witness Affirmation
      • I, [Victoria McJohnson], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

        Signed,

        Image
        [Victoria McJohnson]
        LSSD- Captain

        Date: [12/12/2022]
      Image
    Exhibit #4: Witness Statement Ike Vanburen
    Type of Discovery:
    • Witness Statement
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery The witness statement as provided by Deputy Vanburen with the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department further shows that after an act of evading an officer in a motor vehicle pursuit, the vehicle was stalled and the driver of the vehicle was being followed by Deputy Vanburen. After a short foot pursuit, the driver was arrested, was read his rights and was identified as the Defendant.
    • Image

      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Official Witness Statement
      "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
      Case Information
      • Case Number: []
        Incident Date: [06/12/2022]
      Witness Information
      • Name: [Ike Vanburen]
        Date of Birth: [22/06/1994]
        Phone Number: [483-8885]
        Occupation: [LSSD]
      Witness Statement
      • Captain McJohnson and I were on a delta patrol on senora Fwy when Scoobie and his gang pulled up beside our cruiser and proceeded to get out and vandalize our cruiser by throwing snowballs and kicking the back of the cruiser. After an attempt to stop them, the suspects returned to the Limo and proceeded to evade after not yielding to our sirens. After a short pursuit, they stalled their vehicle and attempted to flee the area. I decided to follow the driver and after a short run they were tased and cuffed after being read their Miranda rights he was ID'd as Scoobie Bathsheba. Placing them in custody I waited for confirmation from Captain Mcjohnson for charges and they were processed.
      Witness Affirmation
      • I, [Ike Vanburen], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

        Signed,
        Ike Vanburen
        Date: [12/02/2023]
      Image


Sincerely,


Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Motion to Amend Charges
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Amend Charges

Honorable Daniels,

  • We the prosecution in the case are requesting an amendment of the charges.
    State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
    Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0029
    Requesting Party: Prosecution
    Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
    Original Charges:
    • VF01 - Evading an Officer
    Amended Charges:
    • VF01 - Evading an Officer
    • GF24 - Perjury

    Detailed explanation:

    The Prosecution notes that the Criminal Case Submission Form is an official statement, which has to be signed with the affirmation that, and we quote:
    all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines
    With reference to the aforementioned, the Prosecution notes that as per the Defendants' narrative under oath as submitted to the court, the Defendant has knowingly and willingly made numerous clearly untrue statements in this official statement to mislead the court in this trial. In this respect and with respect to the evidence as previously provided to the court, the Prosecution notes to the following sentences:
    • "Scoobie did not leave the backseat of the Bathsheba-Mobile" - please refer to evidence exhibits #1, #2, #3 and #4, in which it becomes evident the Defendant was in fact the driver of the vehicle.
    • "Scoobie was still in the Bathsheba-mobile when everyone got back in when the car then took off for the pursuit in which he told the driver (who was not caught and escaped by foot), when the car crashed he got out and ran for fear but that is it." - again, please refer to evidence exhibits #1, #2, #3 and #4, in which it becomes evident the Defendant was in fact the driver of the vehicle.
    • "They never got Scoobie's ID until they had him in custody, yet charged him with Evading an Officer even though Scoobie was not driving, Scoobie begged the driver to stop, and Scoobie informed everyone that he tried getting the driver to stop." - again, please refer to evidence exhibits #1, #2, #3 and #4 in which it becomes evident the Defendant was in fact the driver of the vehicle.
    The Prosecution notes that in case the Prosecution had not been able to present the abundantly clear evidence as kindly provided by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department as previously presented to the Court, these false statements by the Defendant, which are in a direct relation to this trial, would at the very least have had the potential to affect the outcome of the trial. As such, the Prosecution can only conclude that the action of knowingly and willingly providing these false statements to the court should only result in the application of the charge GF24 - Perjury.


Sincerely,


Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Cyrus Raven
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:14 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Cyrus Raven

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Cyrus Raven »

Motion to Suppress
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Suppress

Honorable Colt Daniels,

  • We the Defense in the case below are requesting that certain evidence be inadmissible in court.
    State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
    Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0029
    Requesting Party: Cyrus Raven
    Party Members: Scoobie Bathsheba
    Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit #1: Arrest Report Scoobie Bathsheba
    Detailed explanation:

    The Defense is requesting the following statement be suppressed due to lack of foundation. No direct evidence has been provided to substantiate the narrative that the Defendant was the one who exited the driver's seat.
    I followed Scoobie that got out of the drivers seat

    Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit #3: Witness Statement Victoria Mcjohnson
    Detailed explanation:

    The Defense is requesting the following statements be suppressed due to speculation and opinion testimony.

    This portion of the witness' statement is an opinion. As per the rules of evidence ''Opinion testimony includes inferences and other subjective statements of a witness. Generally, opinions of witnesses are inadmissible because the witness is not testifying to facts''
    Mr. Scoobie Bathsheba was lying to us when we were arresting them and seems to continue to do so in this appeal, attempting to confuse us into thinking that we had not caught every Bathsheba and that the driver was able to escape
    This portion of the witness' statement is speculative. As per the rules of evidence ''A witness may not testify about any matter of which they have no personal knowledge. Only if the witness has directly observed an event may the witness testify about it.''. There is no evidence in discovery to suggest that this witness directly observed the alleged chase and arrest of the Defendant by Deputy Vanburen, presumably as this witness was occupied with another suspect at the time.
    Deputy Vanburen went after the driver, ran after him for a bit, detained him, and it was Mr. Scoobie Batsheba. As stated, we suspected that one of the Batshebas hitting our cruiser was Scoobie as we recognized the voice, but no charges were placed until we could confirmed his identity.

    Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit #4: Witness Statement Ike Vanburen
    Detailed explanation:

    The Defense is requesting the following statement be suppressed due to lack of foundation. No direct evidence such as bodycam or dashcam footage or any other supplemental witness testimony has been submitted in discovery to assert that the Defendant was driving the vehicle at any point, with the defendant's narrative directly opposing this assertion.
    I decided to follow the driver and after a short run they were tased and cuffed after being read their Miranda rights he was ID'd as Scoobie Bathsheba.


Sincerely,

Image
Cyrus Raven
Deputy Chief Public Defender
Image
User avatar
Cyrus Raven
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:14 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Cyrus Raven

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Cyrus Raven »

Motion to Compel Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery

Honorable Colt Daniels,

  • We the Defense in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following material by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
    State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
    Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0029
    Requesting Party: Cyrus Raven
    Party Members: Scoobie Bathsheba, Cyrus Raven
    Discovery from: Los Santos Sheriff's Department

    Type of Discovery:
    • Bodycam footage from Deputy Ike Vanburen
    Detailed reasoning:
    • The Defense is seeking the bodycam footage from Deputy Ike Vanburen as the arresting Deputy in this situation. This bodycam footage will allow the court to obtain a clear and factual understanding of what happened in the moments leading up to the arrest of the Defendant.


Sincerely,

Image
Cyrus Raven
Deputy Chief Public Defender
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Daniels,

    In relation to the Motion to Suppress as filed by the Defense on the February 21, 2023, the Prosecution would like to respond as follows.

    First of all, in relation to the first evidence exhibit, the Prosecution notes that the arrest report clearly depicts, and further supported by evidence exhibits #2, #3 and #4 that it was indeed the Defendant that exited the drivers' seat of the vehicle, as he was immedeatly pursued and apprehended by the Deputy of the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department. As such, the request from the Defense clearly lacks any kind of foundation.

    Furthermore, in relation to the third evidence exhibit the following.
    In the first part of the request, the Defense states that the statement as made by the Captain is an opinion. However, recalling the situation is exactly the goal of a Witness Statement.
    In the second part of the request, the Defense requests the statement from the Captain that the Deputy went after the driver, detained him and confirmed his identity to be an opinion. However, the Prosecution points to the following sentences aside from the arrest report also detailing the Captain's name as part of units involved in the arrest of the Defendant:
    exhibit #1 wrote:upon receiving instruction from Captain Mcjohnson I applied the charges of Evading an officer and resisting arrest to Mr.Scoobie.
    exhibit #3 wrote:I handled the charges on Timowthee Bathsheba while my partner proceeded with the arrest of Scobbie Bathsheba.
    exhibit #3 wrote:As stated, we suspected that one of the Batshebas hitting our cruiser was Scoobie as we recognized the voice, but no charges were placed until we could confirmed his identity.
    As such, and also taking into account the bodycam footage as presented in evidence exhibit #2, it is evident that the Captain was personally able to witness the Deputy going after the Defendant before detaining him. In this respect, the Prosecution concludes that the request from the Defense lacks any kind of foundation.

    Finally, in relation to the fourth evidence exhibit, the Prosecution notes that we have presented a witness statement that directly and clearly depicts, and further supported by evidence exhibits #1, #2 and #3 that it was indeed the Defendant that exited the drivers' seat of the vehicle, as he was immedeatly pursued and apprehended by the Deputy of the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department. As such, the request from the Defense clearly lacks any kind of foundation.

    Following the above, the Prosecution can only conclude that the Motion to Suppress as filed by the Defense should be denied in full.

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

A decision was reached in the above case on the 25th day of Febraury, 2023.


First, I apologize for the Order for Discovery happening while counselors of this case were on a Leave of Absence and will allow the Motion for Discovery to be entered into evidence. Second, I will also allow the Motion to Amend Charges filed on the 21st of February as the prosecution is looking to charge the defendant with Perjury due to statements made by the defendant in the filing of this case.

Moving into the Motion to Suppress filed by the defense on the 21st of February, I will be denying the request to suppress the Exhibit #1 quote of "I followed Scoobie that got out of the drivers seat" as this statement is backed up by other deputies witness statements in this case.

In relation to the request to suppress the Exhibit #3 quote "Mr. Scoobie Bathsheba was lying to us when we were arresting them and seems to continue to do so in this appeal, attempting to confuse us into thinking that we had not caught every Bathsheba and that the driver was able to escape." I will be granting as this is the deputies do not know the intention of what the defendant is attempting to do and the defendant has not yet been found guilty of Perjury so it cannot be proven as factual.

For the request to suppress the Exhibit #3 quote "Deputy Vanburen went after the driver, ran after him for a bit, detained him, and it was Mr. Scoobie Batsheba. As stated, we suspected that one of the Batshebas hitting our cruiser was Scoobie as we recognized the voice, but no charges were placed until we could confirmed his identity." I will be denying this request. As stated by the prosecution, the Captain does have personnel knowledge as she was on scene at the time of the arrests and this is further backed up by two other statements made in Exhibit #3 and one made in Exhibit #1.

In relation to the request to suppress the Exhbit #4 quote "I decided to follow the driver and after a short run they were tased and cuffed after being read their Miranda rights he was ID'd as Scoobie Bathsheba." I will also be denying as this as well is backed up by the Captains witness statement "At no point we lost VC of this limousine so that someone could have jumped out or they could have had time to change the driver." and "Deputy Vanburen went after the driver, ran after him for a bit, detained him, and it was Mr. Scoobie Batsheba."


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Cyrus Raven
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:14 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Cyrus Raven

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Cyrus Raven »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Colt Daniels,

    The Defense would like to remind the court of the pending motion to compel discovery.

    Respectfully,

    Cyrus Raven
    Deputy Chief Public Defender
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    5356160 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Daniels,

    Could you be so kind as to give the Prosectuion a response timeframe on the Motion to Compel Discovery?

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

A decision was reached in the above case on the 25th day of February, 2023.


The court will be granting the Motion to Compel Discovery filed by the Defense Counsel on the 21st of February pending the law enforcement agency still has the body camera footage of the Deputy from the day in question. (( Or if the Deputy remembers the events enough to give a confident replay of the events using /do roleplay. )) I will allow seven days for the prosecution to present this evidence or inform the court of why it cannot be provided. If additional time is required please file a Motion for Continuance before the seven day timeframe has elapsed.


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Daniels,

    We have just been informed by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department that unfortunately, no bodycam footage is available from Deputy Vanburen's bodycam.
    SD representative wrote:Sadly due to the time elapsed from the initial situation it appears the SD card that was used has had all the footage overwritten by more recent situations and nothing from the situation was able to be recovered by our technicians from Deputy Ike Vanburens point of view.

    (( The deputy does not have any recorded footage or the proof of RP from the date of the situation saved ))
    Nonetheless, the Prosecution points out that a bodycam from the pursuit itself as well as the ending has already been supplied in combination with two witness statements that support the also supplied witness statement. As such, the Prosecution is looking forward to the Notice of Scheduling from the court to move on to trial.

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"



NOTICE OF SCHEDULING


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on the 7th of March, 2023.


All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Cyrus Raven
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:14 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Cyrus Raven

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Cyrus Raven »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

WITNESS LIST


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

A Witness List was filed in the above case on the 7th of March, 2023.
  • The defense designates the following list of individuals as witnesses, who may be called to the stand.

    Name of Witness:
    Scoobie Bathsheba
    Description: (party, fact witness, expert, other)
    Defendant
    Witness Agency:
    N/A



Image
Deputy Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 535-6160 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Blake Eli
Posts: 159
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2021 5:04 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Eli Blake

LSEMS Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Blake Eli »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 11 Day of March 2023.


I, Blake Eli, Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Scoobie Bathsheba.

I will be taking the responsibility of the Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Image
Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"



NOTICE OF SCHEDULING


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on the 15th of March, 2023.


All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"



NOTICE OF SCHEDULING


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on the 21st of March, 2023.


All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #23-CM-0029, State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF TRIAL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Scoobie Bathsheba
#23-CM-0029

A trial date was set on the above case on the 22nd of March, 2023.


In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 8:00PM on the 23rd of March, 2023 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancelation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests