#23-CM-0024, State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray

[Doris Murray]

Defendant Name: Doris Murray
Defendant Phone: 405 1182
Defendant Address: Undisclosed
(( Defendant Discord: babx#0331))
Requested Attorney: Cyrus Raven

Charging Department: Police Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 22/NOV/2022 around 03:00 AM
Charge(s):

• WF05 - Firearms Trafficking

Narrative:
I was jumped by two police officers aiming heavy weapons at me while searching for my injured friend. I was told I am being arrested. After asking why, they told me firearms trafficking. I never had any firearms on my person nor in my vehicle.

---

I, Doris Murray, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Judith Mason]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on 23 November, 2022.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

[Roderick Marchisio]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Re: State of San Andreas vs. Doris Murray "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Roderick Marchisio, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.
  
  I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

---

Respectfully,


Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

[Greg Kumerow]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: State of San Andreas v. Doris Muray
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  I, Junior Prosecuting Attorney Gregory Kumerow, will be co-counseling with Deputy Attorney Roderick Marchisio, and will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Junior Prosecuting Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 219-6537 — [email protected]

[Hugh Allgood]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
#23-CM-0024

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 6th of February, 2023.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Defendant is hereby activated by this Court under #23-CM-0024.

At this time the State has adequate representation, however, the Defendant is still seeking representation. At this time the court will delay the Order for Discovery until adequate representation has been assigned and they inform the court they are ready to proceed.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]

[Shaun Harper]

San Andreas Judicial Branch State of San Andreas v. "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Hugh Allgood,
  
  I, Public Defense Attorney Shaun Harper, will be representing the defendant Doris Murray in this case.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Public Defense Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

[Roderick Marchisio]

Motion for Continuance

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Continuance

Honorable Allgood,

• We the Prosecution in the case below are requesting a Continuance for 14 days for the reason listed below.

  ---

  State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
  Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0024

  ---

  Detailed explanation:
  Both Prosecution and Defense will be on a leave of absence starting today. Therefore we request this continuance.
  

  ---

Sincerely,


Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

[Hugh Allgood]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
#23-CM-0024

A decision was reached in the above case on the 7th day of February, 2022.

The court will take judicial notice on the fact both the prosecutor and defense counsel assigned to this case will be on leave of absence until 14/FEB/2023. I will likewise be on leave of absence until 20/FEB/2023, which is in two weeks time. Therefore, I find good cause to grant the motion for continuance, and will be giving the prosecution until the end of the day on 21/FEB/2023 to respond to the motion for discovery immediately following this court decision.



Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]

[Hugh Allgood]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
#23-CM-0024

A court order was entered in the above case on 7th of February, 2023.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Defendant, #23-CM-0024 is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery by the end of the business day on 21/FEB/2023. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.




Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]

[Roderick Marchisio]

Motion for Discovery

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Allgood,

• We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.

  ---

  State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
  Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0024
  Requesting Party: N/A
  Party Members: Roderick Marchisio, Greg Kumerow

  ---

  Exhibit #1:
  Type of Discovery: Arrest Report
  • Physical evidence
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery The arrest report describes the situation in which Ms. Murray was arrested

  • Doris Murray Arrest Report - 23/NOV/2022

    

    

    Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

    ---

    MUGSHOT

    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • 
        Full Name: Doris Murray
        Phone Number: 4051182
        Licenses Suspended: No
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Lieutenant I Eleanor Quinn
        • Police Detective III Joseph Couch
        • Police Officer III Lance Sage
        • Police Officer III Callum Macquoid
        Charges:
        • WF05 - Firearms Trafficking
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • On or around the date of 22/NOV/2022 at approximately 2:50 AM, Doris Murray, henceforth "suspect", was arrested as a result of an operation set up when the Los Santos Police Department's Detective Bureau was notified of an illegal shipment happening down at Raton Canyon by the Cassidy Creek Bridge.
          
          Within 10 minutes, a joint force consisting of the Los Santos Police Department's Detective Bureau, Metropolitan Division and Los Santos County Sheriff's Department Sheriff's Investigation Bureau, Special Enforcement Detail, Gang Field Unit assembled and surounded the area of the shipment.
          
          Timeline

          1:27 AM:

          • Mikazuki Ueno pulls up to Mission Row and illegaly parks in the emergency bay.

          1:28 AM:

          • Police Officer II King Lee confronts Mikazuki Ueno, however, Mikazuki Ueno leaves the parking bay before any proper warnings or citations could be issued.

          1:29 AM:

          • A traffic stop is initiated on Mikazuki Ueno in regards to the parking infraction by 3-K-1 [Police Lieutenant I Eleanor Quinn, Police Detective III Joseph Couch]. Police Officer II King Lee arrives at the stop and takes over as multiple individuals pull up to the stop.
          • Further details are confidential to the Gang and Narcotics Division, details will be provided upon request.

          2:19 AM:

          • Police Lieutenant I Tim Havlicek contacted 3-K-1 [Police Liuetenant I Eleanor Quinn, Police Detective III Joseph Couch]; A briefing in regards to the illegal shipment took place in the Los Santos Police Department's 4th tactical channel, TAC-4. An initial time of between 20-25 minutes was confirmed and subsequently a timer of 18 minutes was set to prepare for the opertation.
          • Further details are confidential to the Gang and Narcotics Division, details will be provided upon request.

          2:25 AM:

          • Commander Garret Groyce was briefed at the Mission Row Police Station - Police Commander Victor Einhart and Police Officer III+1 Joseph Sanchez were also requested to join TAC-4 after which we switched over to the 3rd Joint Tactical Channel, JTAC-3. The aforementioned joint force was assembled and briefed.

          2:28 AM:

          • A Black Kamacho is called out on the South shore by Assistant Sheriff Jon McCornish, passing him, confirmed to have at least one occupant.

          2:34 AM:

          • Assistant Sheriff Jon McCornish, stationed on the South shore of Cassidy Creek, just across from the illegal shipment by the waterfall, confirms to have visual confirmation of the package landing.

          2:35 AM:

          • A 911 call comes in from Mikazuki Ueno at Sandy Shores, detailing a purple Contender that had attempted to hold him up.

          2:37 AM:

          • The joint force had the area completely surrounded, with Police Liuetenant I Eleanor Quinn and Police Detective III Joseph Couch just due East of the shipment on a cliff overlooking it. Visual contact with the package was confirmed once more by the ground team.

          2:41 AM:

          • A Black Kamacho with Orange trim is spotted by Assistant Sheriff Jon McCornish and Police Lieutenant I Eleanor Quinn, passing due North of the shipment on a dirt road, heading East for a bit prior to taking a sharp turn north back toward Great Ocean Highway and the Cassidy Creek Bridge.

          2:43 AM:

          • The same Black Kamacho with Orange trim is spotted by Police Lieutenant I Eleanor Quinn heading down the same dirt path West, rounding the corner behind a cliff prior. Less than thirty (30) seconds later, the vehicle was spotted by Assistant Sheriff Jon McCornish and Police Lieutenant I Eleanor Quinn coming back East from behind the cliff, heading past the shipment, stopping just due North East of it. The vehicle then proceeded to reverse to a set of foliage due North West of the shipment with the occupant exiting and checking the foliage.

          2:44 AM:

          • The occupant of the Kamacho, an African American female, wearing a black mask, white top, black jeans and a pair of running shoes, ran toward the shipment, passing by it prior to rounding the corner right toward Police Lieutenant I Eleanor Quinn and Police Detective III Joseph Couch in order to continue securing the area. Due to the proximity of the suspect, the Detectives were forced to exit their hidden location and place the individual under gun-point or risk being discovered and the suspect running. Assistant Sheriff Jon McCornish had visual of the individual heading out of the vehicle, toward the shipment and subsequently to the Detectives.
          • Around the same time, a black Trophy Truck, registered to and owned by Mikazuki Ueno was spotted pulling up and subsequently leaving as the suspect was apprehended.

          2:45 AM:

          • The black Trophy Truck was pulled over, the registered owner was noted as Mikazuki Ueno and the driver was confirmed to be the registered owner through presenting his San Andreas State Government issued identification with a valid driver's license. Mikazuki Ueno further offered to be searched alongside his vehicle - The details of if a search occured are unknown as of the submission of this arrest report. Mikazuki Ueno was released soon after.

          2:46 AM:

          • The suspect was successfully detained, searched and identified as Doris Murray. A radio tuned to frequency 350 was found on her person. Nothing further was found on her person or in the Kamacho that was searched by Lieutenant Charlie Wilkinson.

          2:50-3:00 AM:

          • The suspect was placed under arrest and transport to Bolingbroke ensued.
  Exhibit #2:
  Type of Discovery: Bodycam footage
  • Bodycam footage
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery bodycam footage from Sheriff McCornish shows the defendant being arrested

  • ---

    Bodycamera footage from Assistant Sheriff Jon McCornish:
    CLICK HERE
    (( Proof of RP ))

    
  Exhibit #3:
  Type of Discovery: Bodycam footage
  • Bodycam footage
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery Still images from Officer Macquiod shows him detaining a black trophy truck belonging to a Mikazuki Ueno and searching its contents

  • Still images from Police Officer III Callum Macquoid's bodycamera:
    Images

    
    
    (( Proof or RP ))

    
  Exhibit #4:
  Type of Discovery: Shipment contents
  • Physical evidence
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery This photograph of the shipment shows the illegal weapons deposit Ms. Murray was arrested near

  • EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
      Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
      
      Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
      • Illegal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: x10 Pistols - Illegal Shipment
        Exhibit B: x1000 Pistol .50 Ammunition - Illegal Shipment
        Exhibit C: Radio - Set to frequency 350
        
        
        Legal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Black balaclava with a skull imprint
        
        
        Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

        
  Exhibit #5:
  Type of Discovery: Witness statement
  • Witness statement
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery In this witness statement, Officer Sage affirms that Ms. Murray was detained and the weapons shipment was captured when he arrived.

  • Police Officer III L. Sage's Statement

    

    

    
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

    Case Information

    • Incident Date: 22/NOV/2022

    Witness Information

    • Name: Lance Sage
      Date of Birth: 11/NOB/2022
      Phone Number: 263-3763
      Occupation: Police Officer

    Witness Statement

    • I was informed by Lieutenant Tim Havlicek about an illegal shipment that is arriving soon and that I need to get ready, I arrived on the scene and started patrolling around and monitoring any movement. I went back to the location of the Illegal Shipment, Once I arrived I heard that it has arrived and Doris Murray was standing on it, Upon arrival, I found Doris Murray detained and the shipment secured.
      
      PORTION REDACTED BY DB/LAU

    Witness Affirmation

    • I, Lance Sage, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
      
      Signed,
      
      
      Lance Sage
      Police Officer III, Major Crime Division
      Los Santos Police Department
      
      Date: 28/NOV/2022

    
  Exhibit #6:
  Type of Discovery: Witness Statement
  • Witness statement
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery In this witness statement, Officer MacQuoid confirms that he lied to Ms. Murray about a purple contender only for PD to receive a call about a purple contender shortly thereafter from Mr. Ueno. He also states that Ms. Murray was seen circling the area several times.

  • Police Officer III Callum Macquiod's Statement

    

    

    
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

    Case Information

    • Incident Date: 22/NOV/2022

    Witness Information

    • Name: Callum Macquoid
      Date of Birth: 16/MAR/1999
      Phone Number: 560-7208
      Occupation: Police Officer

    Witness Statement

    • I was called to assist DB with a comped drop at Zancudo Bridge, we waited for some time after the drop arrived in the hopes of catching the person who was going to collect it. The Orange Kamacho in which Doris was driving was seen multiple times circling the area. At one point they stopped next to me in an unmarked kamacho asking what we were up to, I lied to him stating we were in search of a purple contender who shot at deputies, I heard him relay this over the radio and 30 seconds later a call came in from Mikazuki Ueno stating he had been held up by a purple contender in sandy shores, a clear diversion and further proof they are related. Doris was seen pulling up at the drop and walking around it checking bushes, she was intercepted before reaching the drop. Mikazuki Ueno was also stopped on the scene right next to the drop, he consented to a search of his person and vehicle, as well as being ID'd.
      
      Below is the statement from our SWAT deployment logs written by Ax Spencer:
      
      REDACTED BY LAU

    Witness Affirmation

    • I, Callum Macquoid, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
      
      Signed,
      
      
      Callum Macquoid
      SWAT Officer
      Los Santos Police Department
      
      Date: 27/NOV/2022

    

  ---

  Respectfully,
  
  
  Junior Prosecuting Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 219-6537 — [email protected]
  
  
  Deputy Attorney General
  Director of Public Notary
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

[Hugh Allgood]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT RECORD

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
#23-CM-0024

The following court record was entered in the above case on 20th day of February, 2023.

The court acknowledges the motion for discovery filed by the prosecution, and notes the prosecution met the deadline of end of the day on 21/Februrary/2023 to do so. I will now give the defense 72 hours to respond to this motion (23/February/2023 5:10PM ((UTC))), or to file any other motions deemed relevant for this case.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]

[Shaun Harper]

Motion to Suppress

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Suppress

Honorable Judge's Hugh Allgood,

• We the Defense in the case below are requesting that certain evidence be inadmissible in court.

  ---

  State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
  Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0024
  Requesting Party: Defense
  Party Members: Shaun Harper, Doris Murray

  ---

  Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit #1 Doris Murray Arrest Report specifically the parts relating to Mikazuki Ueno

  ---

  Detailed explanation:
  The Defense does not see any relevancy to the other person mentioned in the arrest report. If there is any relevance to having Mikazuki Ueno's name in the arrest report, it has not been provided by the prosecution.
  

  ---

  ---

  Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit #3 Still images from Police Officer III Callum Macquoid's bodycamera

  ---

  Detailed explanation:
  Again, the Defense does not see any relevancy to the bodycamera footage of Mikazuki Ueno.
  

  ---

  ---

  Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit #6 Police Officer III Callum Macquiod's Statement

  ---

  Detailed explanation:
  The following should be suppressed for Hearsay and Lack of foundation.
  
  At one point they stopped next to me in an unmarked kamacho asking what we were up to, I lied to him stating we were in search of a purple contender who shot at deputies, I heard him relay this over the radio and 30 seconds later a call came in from Mikazuki Ueno stating he had been held up by a purple contender in sandy shores, a clear diversion and further proof they are related.
  

  ---

Respectfully,


Senior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

[Roderick Marchisio]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Re: #23-CM-0024, State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Allgood,
  
  In response to the Motion to Suppress as filed by the Defense on February 20, 2023, the Prosecution would like to respond as follows.
  
  First of all, in relation to the first evidence exhibit, the Defense states that they do not see any relevancy to the other person mentioned in the arrest report. The Prosecution first of all notes that the arrest report is a record made of an arrest taking into account all details that led to the arrest of the Defendant. Some arrest reports are indeed more elaborate than others. The arrest report in the underlying case records all events that happened during the timeframe in which the joint operation between the LSPD and LSSD was set up. The relevance of Mr. Ueno's name being mentioned becomes evident through the analysis of evidence exhibit #6. At the very least, this falls under the category "Relevant to the given situation", which in fact proves the relevance of the name being mentioned in the arrest report.
  
  Second of all, in relation to the third evidence exhibit, this shows that Mr. Ueno was in fact also physically present on the scene of the arrest. As such, taking into account our arguments for the first evidence exhibit, the relevance becomes abundantly clear.
  
  Lastly, in relation to the sixth evidence exhibit, as the Defense is very well aware, a witness statement is a recollection of one's events. With reference to all previously submitted evidence exhibits, it becomes clear that the Defendant was in fact arrested at the scene of the crime and was told certain specific information that they relayed on their radio which thirty seconds later Mr. Ueno made a 911 call for with the exact same information. Concluding, this is nowhere close to hearsay and these statements can actually be backed up by the other evidence exhibits thus having a serious foundation.

---

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

[Hugh Allgood]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
#22-CM-0024

A decision was reached in the above case on the 27th day of Month, 2023.

Regarding the defense request to suppress the portions of Exhibit 1 pertaining to Mikazuki Ueno. The court will be denying this motion, as further evidence supports the possibility that Mikazuki Ueno was related to this situation (specifically within exhibit #6 when the 911 call comes in from Mikazuki Ueno shortly after the defendant contacts law enforcement in the area and relays a (false) narrative over her radio about law enforcement looking for a purple contender that had fired upon officers. Although Mikazuki Ueno calls in and reports being held up, Mikazuki Ueno ultimately ends up in the area of this drop.

Regarding the request to suppress exhibt 3;

The court will be denying this request as the foundation has been laid -- Mikazuki Ueno made a 911 call to law enforcement very shortly after a radio call was made by the defendant with specific information, which the evidence shows was false information conjured by law enforcement. Therefore, Mikazuki Ueno coincidentally reporting being held up by a vehicle matching the description of the false statement made by law enforcement forms the foundation for Mikazuki Ueno's involvement. In agreement with the prosecution, through review of the evidence in whole, this court believes the proper foundation to admit this evidence has been laid. How/if the prosecution chooses to use this evidence in their case-in-chief is at the prerogative of the prosecution.

Regarding the defense request to suppress portions of exhibit 6;

• "asking what we were up to": The court will be denying this motion to suppress. This is a statement made by the witness, who made such statement under the penalties of perjury (sworn statement), and is merely recalling an event that occurred directly to them. In this case, Officer Macquoid is merely recalling what the defendant did from their own observation. Further, since Officer Macquoid was there at the time of the details they are describing, the proper foundation has been laid.
• - "I heard him relay this over the radio and 30 seconds later a call came in from Mikazuki Ueno stating he had been held up by a purple contender in sandy shores, a clear diversion and further proof they are related.": The court will also be denying this motion to suppress. This is not hearsay. Directly from the court's rules of evidence (2.6.10), "For example, testimony to show that a statement was said and heard, or to show that the speaker could speak a certain language, or to show the subsequent actions of a listener, is admissible." This is direct testimony from the Officer recalling a statement they heard. The Officer is not making a statement about what was specifically said, merely that some information was relayed over the radio and the subsequent 911 call came in. Again, since Officer Macquoid was there at the time of the details they are describing, the proper foundation has been laid.

An attempt at scheduling this matter for trial will take place within a few days).

Thanks,


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]

[Hugh Allgood]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
#23-CM-0024

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on the 28th of February, 2023.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.




Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]

[Marty Millionaire]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Re: State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Hugh Allgood,
  
  
  I, Junior Defense Attorney Marty Millionaire, will be co-counseling with Senior Defense Attorney Shaun Harper, and representing the defendant Dorris Murray in this case.
  
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Junior Public Defense Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 450-3722 — [email protected]

[Hugh Allgood]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF TRIAL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
#23-CM-0024

A trial date was set on the above case on 5th of March, 2023.

In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 8:00 PM on the 6th of March, 2023 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding taking place they must inform the court by filing a Witness List no later than 24 hours prior to the above listed date. Due to the short notice, I will be allowing parties up until 12 hours prior to the trial start time to announce any witnesses.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancelation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.



Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]

[Hugh Allgood]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Doris Murray
#23-CM-0024

A decision was reached in the above case on the 6th day of March, 2023.

In order to find Ms. Murray guilty of firearms trafficking, the court has to determine that the defendant possessed 5 or more illegal or unlicensed firearms at one time beyond reasonable doubt.

As noted in the evidence and testimony provided here today, the defendant was apprehended by law enforcement running towards a shipment that contained 10 illegal firearms, along with 1000 rounds of ammunition for these firearms. Law enforcement received intel about this illegal shipment prior to contacting the defendant running towards it. The defense claims the defendant was merely at the "wrong place at the wrong time", and argues the defendant was merely in that area looking for an injured friend. As the prosecution pointed out, if the defendant was truly looking for an injured friend, the defendant could have mentioned this to the law enforcement officers she spoke to in the area, who would have arguably assisted the defendant in locating and seeking treatment for the friend, however, this did not occur. Therefore, reasonable doubt is cast upon the defendant's statement and defense arguments about the defendant merely being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

In the evidence and testimony presented today was testimony about false information regarding a purple contender having fired upon law enforcement being given to the defendant by law enforcement who were staking out the area for the illegal shipment, immediately preceding her arrest. This information was then relayed over radio, and a third party made a 911 call about a purple contender attempting to hold them up. This call is of particular relevance to this case. Given the existence of a purple contender, in this specific instance, is admittedly false, it is arguably not mere coincidence that a 911 call would be made detailing a purple contender being involved in criminal acts by Mr. Ueno. While there are most certainly purple contenders in existence in this state, the two events occurring in such close proximity together is highly unlikely, and does not give rise to any doubt on the actions of Mr. Ueno.

The prosecution argues the concept of the defendant constructively possessing the container of illegal firearms due to the defendant having the knowledge, intention, and ability to possess the items. While a novel idea to the Superior Court of San Andreas, the court finds this argument persuasive and more than reasonable. The defendant, by her actions, took acts to search for the items by searching the bushes in the area of the shipment location, and appears to have had the intention to possess these items based on her actions to run directly towards the items before being apprehended, and had the ability to possess these items. These three facts considered together suggests Ms. Murry had all intentions to possess these items, and would have done so if she was not apprehended. Therefore, the court finds the defendant did in-fact constructively possess these items beyond any reasonable doubt.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of WF05 - Weapons trafficking, I find the defendant, Doris Murray, guilty.

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 235-6076 — [email protected]