#22-CM-0076, State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

Locked
Swat Nixon
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:56 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

#22-CM-0076, State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

Post by Swat Nixon »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Swat Nixon
Defendant Phone: 216-4573
Defendant Address: Homeless
(( Defendant Discord: Swatowski#7225 ))
Requested Attorney: N/A
Image
Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 12/11/2022 05:30 AM
Charge(s):
  • Evading a Police Officer
Narrative:
I was driving through the city when I noticed a police officer was behind me while I was in the tunnel at LSC and had his lights on, so I slowed down at a cruising speed of 85 and instead of pulling over in the tunnel or right outside LSC I just pulled into LSC where there were people and it’s a safe area generally. Once I pulled over the police officer told me to get out of my vehicle with my hands up. I proceeded to do what the officer had told me, he then arrested me for evading a police officer. He then transported me to DOC where I served my time. The officer who accused me of evading and eluding was Joseph Sanchez, the officer who handcuffed me and read me my rights was Sayaka Yukimura as well as Valkyrie Winger being present at the time of the arrest.


I turned my life around 8 months ago for the better, I stopped getting felonies and started looking towards the future. I recently had my first job at the Medical Department and started caring more for my future. I personally do not see how it is plausible that I would evade an officer and pull over just to throw 8 months of trying to make my record more appealing for job opportunities.


I, Swat Nixon, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To whom it may concern,

    The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Roderick Marchisio, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.

    I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

Respectfully,


Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on 15 November, 2022.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Shaun Harper
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1040
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:33 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

Post by Shaun Harper »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Edward Greeg
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judith Mason,

    I, Public Defense Attorney Shaun Harper, will be representing the defendant Swat Nixon in this case.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Public Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 308-7889 — [email protected]
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0076, State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #22-CM-0076, State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Parties,

    My name is Associate Justice Judith Mason and I will be handling this case under docket number #22-CM-0076. As a plea agreement has been presented and accepted by all parties, this case will be immediately resolved and a verdict will be posted momentarily.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0076, State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Document 1 | Filed 7/12/2022 | Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS



  • Docket Number:
    #22-CM-0076
    Date Filed:
    15/11/2022
    State of San Andreas

    v.

    Swat Nixon


PLEA AGREEMENT


  • Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon; Prosecuting Attorney Roderick Marchisio, Public Defense Attorney Shaun Harper, and the defendant, Swat Nixon, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
    1. Current Charges
      1. VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle
      2. GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
    2. Former Charges
      The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
      1. VF01 - Evading an Officer
    3. General Provisions
      • The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
    4. Waiver of Rights
      • It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.

        This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of an defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.

        By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.


    Roderick Marchisio
    Deputy Attorney General Roderick Marchisio
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 11/DEC/2022

    Shaun Harper
    Public Defense Attorney Shaun Harper
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 7/12/2022

    Swat Nixon
    Swat Nixon
    Defendant
    Date Signed: 09/12/2022

    Judy Mason
    Honorable Judith Mason
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 12/DEC/2022

User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0076, State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#22-CM-0076

A decision was reached in the above case on the 12th day of December, 2022.


The case of #22-CM-0076, State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon has been resolved.

A plea agreement signed by all parties has been accepted by the court. As outlined in the full agreement, the prosecution agrees to no longer pursue the VF01 - Evading an Officer charge in exchange for a guilty plea of VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle and GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
  • On the count of VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle, I find the defendant, Swat Nixon, guilty.
  • On the count of GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify, I find the defendant, Swat Nixon, guilty.



Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest