Eclipse Government

Defendant Name: Tanaka Inagawa
Defendant Phone: 406-8585
Defendant Address: 22 Spanish ave
(( Defendant Discord: iTearsひ#6209 ))
Requested Attorney: Rockford Law

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 10/1/2022 10:15PM
Charge(s):

• Illegal firearm, illegal gun modification, Failure to comply

Narrative:
Note I complied with the pullover and gave my license to officer Lucas Draco. Was pulled over according to the officer at 100 miles per hour, right off the bat you can see I wasn't even charged for that. As seen on the body cam of officer's badge # 20965 (Lucas Draco) they kept on insisting me to get out of my car for no good reason and instead of citing me for speeding tazed me and went through my belongings and charged for an illegal fire arm completely separate from this apparent pullover. Officer Badge(Darren Shaw)was also involved in the pullover aswell as another officer badge 23741 name unknown. The police getting me out of the car was completely unjustified.

---

I, Tanaka Inagawa, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Roderick Marchisio, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.
  
  I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

---

Respectfully,


Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

• To whom it may concern,
  
  I, Pavel Perrault, will be taking on the role of defending Tanaka Inagawa in this case. I have made myself familiar with the facts of the case and have communicated with the client. I am ready to continue at the court's discretion.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Attorney
  Rockford Law
  (909) 233-8504 [email protected]

---

---

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

---

• Counselors,
  
  I am Chief Justice Colt Daniels and I will be presiding over this case in my courtroom. I have now activated this case under #23-CM-0012. As both parties in this case have representation, immediately following this notice I will be ordering discovery from the prosecution.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Chief Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

---

---

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa, #23-CM-0012 is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.




Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Daniels,

• We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.

  ---

  State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
  Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0012
  Requesting Party: N/A
  Party Members: Roderick Marchisio

  ---

  Exhibit #1: Arrest Report Tanaka Inagawa
  Type of Discovery:
  • Physical Evidence
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery The arrest as written up by Officer Lucas Draco report gives insight into the situation that led to the arrest of the Defendant. It is worth noting that the Officer spotted the vehicle as a part of a convoy of vehicles and clocked the vehicle at a speed over the speed limit. The Officer then notes that the individual was asked as part of a lawful order to step out of the vehicle multiple times, which the Defendant continued to fail to adhere to this lawful order. After being given a final chance, the Officers removed the Defendant from the vehicle, after which an illegal firearm and silencer were found, leading to the arrest.

  • 
  Exhibit #2: Items as found on the Defendant
  Type of Discovery:
  • Physical evidence
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery The items that were found on the Defendant included a black mask, a pair of black gloves, a silencer, a radio and a pistol .50. Upon inspecting, the pistol .50 proved to be an illegal one. In this respect, we note that this was proven by identifying the serial number. We further note the items were put in the evidence locker by Officer Draco shortly after the incident.

  • Spoiler

    
    
    
  Exhibit #3: Evidence to be submitted under seal
  Type of Discovery:
  • Evidence to be submitted under seal
  Spoiler

  All Information from the Discovery Evidence to be submitted under seal

  • Evidence to be submitted under seal

  ---

Sincerely,

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Daniels,
  
  As evident through our Motion for Discovery, the Prosecution would like to submit the third evidence exhibit under seal. Please inform us how you wish to receive this.

---

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

• Prosecutor Marchisio,
  
  You are directed to submit under seal Exhibit #3 in Private Workroom 1. Attorney Tidus Law and yourself have been added.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Chief Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

---

---

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.




Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Daniels,
  
  The Prosecution has filled in their available times. Apologies in advance for my limited availability in the upcoming week with my LOA coming up.

---

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Daniels,
  
  Mr. Perrault is no longer handling cases for us, I will be taking the lead on this case. Mr. Tidus Law will be my co-counsel. We sincerely apologize for any issues this may cause. After a lengthy deliberation with the defendant in this case we have concluded that at this time they no longer wish to move forward and request its dismissal. On behalf of Rockford Law, I want to personally thank the court and prosecution for their time and effort in this case despite the defendant's decision to not pursue it.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Attorney
  Rockford Law
  (909) 531-2757 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Daniels,
  
  We the Defense in the case below are requesting a voluntary dismissal from the court, please find the reason for it below.
  State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
  Assigned Court Case Number:#23-CM-0012
  Requesting Party: Defense
  Party Members: Johnnie Everdeen and Tidus Law
  Voluntary Dismissal:
  Detailed explanation:
  Our client wishes to withdraw his dispute of these charges and respectfully requests this case be dismissed. We would like to extend our gratitude for the time and effort the prosecution and court have dedicated to this case.
  Thank you for your consideration.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Attorney
  Rockford Law
  (909) 531-2757 — [email protected]

---

• Docket Number:
  #23-CM-0012
  Date Filed:
  02/OCT/2022
  Violations:
  WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
  WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications
  GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
  State of San Andreas
  
  v.
  
  Tanaka Inagawa

---

---

• Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa; Deputy Attorney General Roderick Marchisio, Private Defense Attorney Tidus Law, and the defendant, Tanaka Inagawa, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
  
  1. Current Charges
     1. WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
     2. WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications
     3. GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
  2. Former Charges
     The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
     1. WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
     2. WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications
     3. GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
  3. Waived Charges
     The state shall waive the rights to prosecute the following charges in the underlying situation:
     1. Any other charges known or reasonably could have been known to the State.
  4. General Provisions
     • The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. Further, The State waives the right to additionally pursue the Waived Charges outlined in Section III in regards to this particular incident unless a fact the state did not know or reasonably could not have been aware of comes to light. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
  5. Waiver of Rights
     • It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the prosecution agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the prosecution may not further prosecute charges agreed to within this plea bargain. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
       
       This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of an defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
       
       By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.
  
  
  Roderick Marchisio
  Deputy Attorney General Roderick Marchisio
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Date Signed: 04/FEB/2023
  
  Tidus Law
  Private Defense Attorney Tidus Law
  Rockford Law
  Date Signed: 04/FEB/2023
  
  Tanaka Inagawa
  Tanaka Inagawa
  Defendant
  Date Signed: 05/FEB/2023
  
  Colt Daniels
  Honorable Colt Daniels
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Date Signed: 06/FEB/2023

---

---

The case of #23-CM-0012, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa has been resolved.

A plea agreement signed by all parties has been accepted by the court. As outlined in the full agreement, the prosecution agrees to no longer pursue additional charges on the defendant in exchange for a guilty plea of the original charges.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons, I find the defendant, Tanaka Inagawa, guilty.
• On the count of WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications, I find the defendant, Tanaka Inagawa, guilty.
• On the count of GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify, I find the defendant, Tanaka Inagawa, guilty.
  
  
  
  
  Chief Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]