#23-CM-0004, State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Locked
Neo King
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2022 3:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: ATV

#23-CM-0004, State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Neo King »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Neo King
Defendant Phone: 476-7480
Defendant Address: HERE
(( Defendant Discord: AidannnTV#9213 ))
Requested Attorney: N/A
Image
Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 11/09/2022 02:20HRS
Charge(s):
  • Felony Evading
Narrative:
I have been wrongfully charged and sentenced for a crime that I did not commit.
I was charged for Felony evading on the basis that this was an active warrant that was put on my record from a detective who he believed was me evading police due to my phone being "traced". This charged was placed on the grounds only (from what I've been told whilst police cameras recording) and I have spent my full sentence at DOC. This was traumatising!

This entire thing came from an incident that originated from someone who called out he has been shot by someone who looks like a joker. An officer speculated and said it's "Neo King". This was all captured-on police body worm cameras.

I was not charged for any weapon offences.
I was not the person who was ever chased by police.
I was not arrested at the incident but, picked up from an event that I had a legal reason to be at.
Their story and chain of events leading to my arrest have no continuity.

I hold a valid gun license, and have been a citizen in this city for a long time who can still count his charges on one hand... I believe there has been some serve corruption or misconduct carried out and I want to fight my case in the courts to prove my innocents to this matter and get the correct justice served.

How can they place a charge on someone from what they "believed was me" during an active phone trace, when I could've simply passed my phone to someone else...
I have fully recorded times, badge numbers, property lost (stolen by LEOs).


I, Neo King, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Albert Lewis
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:57 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

Re: State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Albert Lewis »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

State of San Andreas v. Neo King
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To Whom it may convern,

    I, State Prosecutor Albert "Big Al" Lewis, will be representing the State of San Andreas as their counsel for this case. Please allow me to familarize myself on this appeal and begin collecting evidence for the court.

    Respectfully,
    Albert "Big Al" Lewis

    Prosecuting Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 464-6046 — [email protected]
    Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Neo King

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on 10 November, 2022.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
Online
User avatar
Antonio McFornell
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1161
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2022 10:24 pm
ECRP Forum Name: McFornell

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Antonio McFornell »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch


"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Dear Justice Daniels,

    The purpose of this notice is to let all those interested be aware that I will be representing the State of San Andreas in this case.

    As of this time, I will begin collecting all the necessary resources for the development of this case.

    Best regards,

    Image
    Prosecuting Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 553-8869 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Antonio José McFornell
Court Clerk
Director of the San Andreas Bar Association
Chairman of the Bar Ethics Review Board
Training & Hiring Staff

Express your satisfaction or concerns about Judicial Employees and licensed Attorneys.
Commend & Complain
Code of Ethics | Bar Licensing Office | Become an Attorney
State Constitution | Penal Code
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0004, State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #23-CM-0004, State of San Andreas v. Neo King

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • To whom it may concern,

    I am Associate Justice Judith Mason and I will be the presiding over this case in my courtroom. At this point in time, I will be assigning this case to docket number #23-CM-0004.

    This case is now pending appointment of defense counsel.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Associate Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Cyrus Raven
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:14 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Cyrus Raven

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0004, State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Cyrus Raven »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Neo King
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judith Mason,

    I, Deputy Chief Public Defender Cyrus Raven, have reached out to the defendant, Neo King, in this case and am waiting confirmation from the Defendant they wish to proceed with their appeal. If no answer is given within 7 days of this notice, I will request for an involuntary dismissal.
    Respectfully,



    Image
    Deputy Chief Public Defender
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    5356160 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Ruwin Korbel
Posts: 95
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 8:00 am
ECRP Forum Name: Ruwin Korbel

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0004, State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Ruwin Korbel »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Neo King
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To whom it may concern,

    I, Junior Defence Attourney Ruwin Korbel, will be co-counseling with Chief Public Defender Cyrus Raven and representing the defendant Neo King In this case, should they wish to proceed.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Junior Defence Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    556-2848 — [email protected]
    Image
User avatar
Cyrus Raven
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:14 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Cyrus Raven

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0004, State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Cyrus Raven »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Neo King
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judith Mason,

    I have attempted to make contact with the Defendant through email and text since the 4th of January @ 11:00 AM. To this date, I have yet to receive a response.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Deputy Chief Public Defender
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    5356160 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2578
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #23-CM-0004, State of San Andreas v. Neo King

Post by Judith Mason »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Neo King
#23-CM-0004

A decision was reached in the above case on the 11th day of January, 2023.


With the defendant's failure to make meaningful contact with the court, this case will be dismissed and the charges shall remain on the defendant's record. Furthermore, the defendant will be subject to pay court fees in the amount of $10,000 in accordance with Judicial Branch policy for time, effort, and resources expended on this case after it's activation.


Image
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests