Eclipse Government

Posted: **04 Sep 2022, 16:43**

Defendant Name: Hassan Readick
Defendant Phone: 419-5037
Defendant Address: Homeless
(( Defendant Discord: Herbo#4572 ))
Requested Attorney: Cyrus Raven

Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 31/08/2022 01:06
Charge(s):

SF01 - Domestic Terrorism

Narrative:
I would like to appeal and get this charge removed.

I, Hassan Readick, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

Posted: **04 Sep 2022, 18:35**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

To whom it may concern,

The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Roderick Marchisio, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.

I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

Respectfully,

Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

Posted: **30 Oct 2022, 17:44**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

To whom it may concern,

The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Junior Prosecuting Attorney Sarah Williams, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case as co-counsel.

I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

Respectfully,
Sarah Williams

Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
463-8400 — [email protected]

Posted: **08 Nov 2022, 02:45**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Parties,

I am Associate Justice Judith Mason and I will be the presiding over this case in my courtroom. At this point in time, I will be assigning this case to docket number #22-CM-0072.

This case is now pending appointment of defense counsel.

Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Posted: **08 Nov 2022, 09:26**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

To whom it may concern,

I, Chief Public Defender Cyrus Raven, will be representing the defendant, Hassan Readick, in this case and will be making contact with the defendant. I am ready to proceed at the court's discretion and will inform the court if I am unable to contact the defendant.

Respectfully,

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
5356160 — [email protected]

Posted: **11 Nov 2022, 00:33**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

#22-CM-0072
Presiding Judge: Judith Mason

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
#22-CM-0072

A court order was entered in the above case on 11 November, 2022.

The case of the #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Posted: **16 Nov 2022, 22:44**

Motion for Continuance

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Continuance

Honorable Judith Mason,

We the Prosecution in the case below are requesting a Continuance for 7 days for the reason listed below.
State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0069
Detailed explanation:
As the underlying charge is of a very serious and deeply concerning nature, the Prosecution is requesting additional time to put together the required evidence.

(( The footage that is available to us contains ECRP server staff chat and as such cannot be used. We will need to blur it somehow, but this is outside of my control. ))

Sincerely,

Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

Posted: **24 Nov 2022, 15:10**

Motion for Involuntary Dismissal

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Involuntary Dismissal

Honorable Judith Mason,

We the Defense in the case below are requesting an involuntary dismissal from the court, please find the reason for it below.
State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0072
Requesting Party: Cyrus Raven
Party Members: Hassan Readick, Cyrus Raven
Involuntary Dismissal: Failure to Comply to Court Order, Unreasonable Delay
Detailed explanation:

The defense is requesting an involuntary dismissal. The prosecution was ordered on the 11th of November to submit discovery within 7 days. On the 16th of November, the prosecution submitted a request for continuance, asking for 7 days to submit discovery.

It has been 13 days since the order for discovery and 7 days since the continuance request. We argue this has placed undue burden on the defendant and delayed this case to an unreasonable degree by failing to comply with the initial order for discovery and subsequent continuance request.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Cyrus Raven
Chief Public Defender

Posted: **25 Nov 2022, 18:56**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Mason,

The Prosecution notes that no decision has been made on the Motion for Continuance. As such, principles of due process dictate that the Prosecution simply has not been in default. Further, the Prosecution doubts any actual undue burden, given the fact the Defendant had already served his sentence before the activation of this case.

(( We are still awaiting the unedited footage. ))

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

Posted: **25 Nov 2022, 18:58**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Mason,

Due to the fact it appears the Defendant has not been in the state for quite a while, the Prosecution would like to have confirmed by the Defense that contact has indeed been established with the Defendant.

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

Posted: **25 Nov 2022, 18:58**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Mason,

Due to the fact it appears the Defendant has not been in the state for quite a while, the Prosecution would like to have confirmed by the Defense that contact has indeed been established with the Defendant.

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

Posted: **26 Nov 2022, 00:39**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Parties,

I would like to apologize for my delay in response to the Motion for Continuance.

(( In order to account for the staff chat bodycam footage issue )) Due to the severity of the charges, I will be giving the prosecution 36 hours from this notice to present evidence for this case. Defense counsel raises a valid concern, so I caution the prosecution that any further delay will result in a dismissal with prejudice due to unreasonable delay.

As to the prosecution's concern with the participation of the defendant, I would ask the defense to please confirm that, at the very least, initial contact has been made with the defendant with the intent to pursue this dispute of charges.

Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Posted: **26 Nov 2022, 13:48**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judith Mason,

I can confirm that initial contact was made with the Defendant at or close to the date the appeal was filled.

Respectfully,

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch - Command
5356160 — [email protected]

Posted: **26 Nov 2022, 13:53**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Your Honor,

The Prosecution did not request a confirmation that initial contact was made with the Defendant at or close to the date the appeal was filled, but confirmation that the Defendant is still actually present in the State and intending on continuing the underlying case.

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

Posted: **26 Nov 2022, 15:54**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Personal Email
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judith Mason,

The Defense, as the Defendant's legal representatives, will continue with this case. We are under no obligation to provide the prosecution with any information on our discussions with our client, nor is him being in or out of the city any of the prosecution's concern as all ethical guidelines are being followed. Furthermore, we feel we have adequately responded to court's request to confirm initial contact had been made, which it has. I fear this is an attempt by the prosecution to force an involuntary dismissal given the fact they have failed to provide any discovery up until this moment.

Respectfully,

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch - Command
5356160 — [email protected]

Posted: **26 Nov 2022, 22:26**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Parties,

I will be siding with the defense on this matter - I specifically requested confirmation that initial contact had been made to confirm the defendant wanted to proceed with charges to ensure that his defense attorneys had gotten in contact with him to discuss potential trial strategy.

Had this initial contact not been made, I would likely be dismissing this case in favor of the prosecution due to previous precedent, however, as the defendant's wishes have been made known to the defense and the defense has made meaningful communication with the defendant, I will not be dismissing the case on those grounds.

This case will still be pending the 36 hour window given to the prosecution, which will expire at 12:39pm on 27/NOV/2022, in approximately 14 hours.

Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Posted: **26 Nov 2022, 22:53**

((The physical footage was made available to Hugh (HotPipin) as server staff - the rest of the footage can be roleplayed from that. I’m not going to expect someone to edit a 40 minute video as much of the roleplay was text and will be extremely tedious to edit just the staff element. This footage has RPly been provided to the persecution months ago.))

Posted: **27 Nov 2022, 11:38**

Motion for Discovery

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Mason,

We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0072
Requesting Party: N/A
Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
Exhibit #1: Arrest Report Hassan Readick
Type of Discovery:
- Physical Evidence
Spoiler
All Information from the Discovery The arrest report of the Defendant shows the reasoning behind his arrest.
Exhibit #2: Witness Statement Hector Mayfield
Type of Discovery:
- Witness Statement
Spoiler
All Information from the Discovery The Witness Statement as provided by Detective Hector Mayfield with the Los Santos Police Department gives further insight into the situation that led to the arrest of the Defendant. More specifically, the Prosecution would like to raise attention to the fact that the Defendant, during the arresting procedure, willingly admitted that he was a distraction for a group that has previously committed an act of terrorism on the power station. We quote:
I asked him if he thought blowing up a power plant was humane. He responded with "Yes. We were proving a point".
This, in combination with the further evidence and probable cause, is nothing more than a clear admission of guilt.
Exhibit #3: Bodycam footage Hector Mayfield
Type of Discovery:
- Physical evidence
Spoiler
All Information from the Discovery The bodycam footage as provided by Detective Hector Mayfield with the Los Santos Police Department gives further insight into the situation that led to the arrest of the Defendant. More specifically, the Prosecution would like to raise attention to the fact that the Defendant, during the arresting procedure, willingly admitted that he was a distraction for a group that has previously committed an act of terrorism on the power station. We quote:
I asked him if he thought blowing up a power plant was humane. He responded with "Yes. We were proving a point".
This, in combination with the further evidence and probable cause, is nothing more than a clear admission of guilt.
- **video**
  
  ((
  
  Bodycam RP
  
  Unfortunately, due to previously mentioned issued not much more is available to share. I will update this if more can be derived from the footage. In this respect, I hope for some understanding in this particular situation.
  
  ))

Sincerely,

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

Posted: **27 Nov 2022, 12:09**

Motion to Amend Charges

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Amend Charges

Honorable Mason,

We the prosecution in the case are requesting an amendment of the charges. The Prosecution notes that as the underlying case had been activated before the announced changes to the docket, the principles of legal certainty and due process dictate the activated cases at the time of the changes to the docket cannot be impacted by these changes and as such, there simply are no legal grounds on which this Motion can be denied.
State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0072
Requesting Party: Prosecution
Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
Original Charges:
- SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
Amended Charges:
- SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
- GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer
- GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
Detailed explanation:

With reference to the evidence as previously provided to the court, the Prosecution deems it clear the Defendant willingly provided the Los Santos Police Department with false information during their investigation of the Defendant that led to his arrest. As such, the Prosecution can only conclude these actions of willfully providing false information during the course of a lawful investigation should lead to the application of the charges GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer and GM14 - Obstruction of Justice.

Sincerely,

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

Posted: **27 Nov 2022, 12:29**

Motion to Suppress

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Suppress

Honorable Judith Mason,

We the Defense in the case below are requesting that certain evidence be inadmissible in court.
State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0072
Requesting Party: Cyrus Raven
Party Members: Hassan Readick, Cyrus Raven
Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit #2: Witness Statement Hector Mayfield
Detailed explanation:

The witness statement does not comply with this court's standards, lacking any sort of witness affirmation statement and not being submitted using the Judicial Branch Witness Statement form.

((On an OOC note, I would request that at the very least still screenshots be provided of the quotes within the statement, this in regard to Exhibit #3 the body-cam footage. While I understand and more than agree that editing a half-hour long video with staff chat is not feasible, I think we should at least get some screenshots to confirm what was said via text chat by Hassan Readick. From an IC perspective, the only statement on body-cam provided seems to be ''I...was just the distraction'', ''Yes'' and the smile and laugh being caught on body-cam))

Sincerely,

Cyrus Raven
Chief Public Defender

Posted: **27 Nov 2022, 12:30**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judith Mason,

The Defense objects to the Prosecution's motion to amend charges as they do not comply with the recent changes this court has put in place.

Respectfully,

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch - Command
5356160 — [email protected]

Posted: **28 Nov 2022, 01:35**

((If there there needs to be any RP from the footage, I will come into game and provide any RP of what the footage would show from the version I have. Alternatively, I can summarize the footage if that would be beneficial.))

Posted: **19 Dec 2022, 00:55**

((I'm going to add in this OOC note as it was explained previously. The entire questioning RP was done through text with no usage of VOIP from either side. I did not utilize VOIP for the specific purpose of having everything logged. I do not personally have interest in going through 20-30 minutes of footage (with the middle of it cut out as I only got a few 5 minute clips of it) and blocking out staff chat. I do not see why logs cannot be pulled in this instance to get the full RP as that's exactly what things are logged for and the entire reason for bodycam rp.))

Posted: **08 Jan 2023, 00:02**

((Here are the logs I could derive from the situation. Certain things have been redacted, and LFM has approved this document.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11opWl6 ... sp=sharing))

Posted: **08 Jan 2023, 23:56**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0072, State of San Andreas v. Hassan Readick
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

Parties,

I once again thank you for your patience while I have been on a Leave of Absence.

To summarize the status of this case, current pending motions are as follows:
- Prosecution's Motion for Discovery of Arrest Report, Witness Statement of Hector Mayfield, and Officer Body-Camera Footage
- Prosecution's Motion to Amend Charges to Include GM12 and GM14
- Defense's Motion to Suppress the Witness Statement of Hector Mayfield
While some supporting information has already been provided thus far, I will allow both parties a reasonable amount of time to make a submission in support or against each of the pending motions before a decision is made.

(( To be clear, the logs provided by Hugh Allgood in the previous reply is considered to be the body-camera footage of Hector Mayfield submitted as Prosecution's Exhibit #3.

For the purposes of identifying whisper commands which would have been heard in the footage, ID 75 is Hassan Readick, ID 93 is a law enforcement officer, and ID 163 is Hector Mayfield.

Lastly, the limited footage that was previously provided to Staff started at 1661907682 in the middle of the Miranda Rights being read over VOIP, with the final question of "Do you understand those rights?" being said at 1661907690 followed by Hassan Readick's confirmation of "Yes" provided in logs at 1661907692. ))

Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]