#22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Locked
iTearsFPS
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2022 2:15 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Duncan McCloud

#22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by iTearsFPS »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Tanaka Inagawa
Defendant Phone: 406-8585
Defendant Address: 30 Spanish Ave
(( Defendant Discord: iTearsひ#6209 ))
Requested Attorney: Public Defender
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 01/Sep/2022 12:40AM
Charge(s): Illegal Fire Arm, and im assuming failure to comply since I was attempted to fight with the cops about the reason for their search made no sense. Maybe pointing a gun at an officer since that was their claim for the search.
Narrative:
Someone was picking my car infront of Weazel Apt I run outside to defend my property people are running around with guns in BLACK not white which I WAS wearing and the cops stop and detain me even though they admit they saw someone picking my car. The cop in question claimed i pointed a gun at them which NEVER happened and I asked them to recheck bodycam and he said he did but no way he could have in that short amount of time. Then forced me out of my car and check my pockets then force me to unlock my car.


Please check the officers bodycam who I mention about Badge 7855, I know Jonathan willowick was there, Darren Shaw, Coral, Xoza Shadow. Please review the officer in questions bodycam will show I never aimed a gun and the traffic stop was wrong aswell as the search. I was the victim of someone attempting to rob my car.



I, Tanaka Inagawa, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Last edited by iTearsFPS on Fri Sep 02, 2022 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To whom it may concern,

    The purpose of this notice is to inform you that as of this moment I, Roderick Marchisio, will be representing the State of San Andreas in all the proceedings pertaining to the underlying case.

    I will take it upon myself to reach out to the involved parties to collect and review all evidence in relation to the underlying case to ensure a proper and smooth continuation of this process.

Respectfully,


Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Pavel Perrault
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon May 10, 2021 6:01 pm
ECRP Forum Name: DC2MT74

Re: State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Pavel Perrault »

Image

Rockford Law

State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

  • To whom it may concern,

    I, Pavel Perrault, will be taking on the role of defending Tanaka Inagawa in this case. I have made myself familiar with the facts of the case and have communicated with the client. I am ready to continue at the court's discretion.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Attorney
    Rockford Law
    (909) 233-8504 [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Counselors,

    I am Chief Justice Colt Daniels and I will be presiding over this case in my courtroom.

    At this time I am activating this case under #22-CM-0070. I see that currently the defendant has private representation from Rockford Law, and the state is being represented by a prosecuting attorney. With both sides having adequate representation, immediately following this notice I will be ordering discovery from the prosecution.

    Respectfully,

    Chief Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"


#22-CM-0070
Presiding Judge: Colt Daniels

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
#22-CM-0070

A court order was entered in the above case on 25 October, 2022.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa, #22-CM-0070 is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.




Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Daniels,

  • We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
    State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
    Assigned Court Case Number:
    Requesting Party: N/A
    Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
    Exhibit #1: Arrest Report 02/SEP/2022
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical Evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery Arrest Report of Tanaka Inagawa dated 02/SEP/2022
    • Tanaka Ikagawa Arrest Report - 02/SEP/2022
      Rija Luigi wrote: Fri Sep 02, 2022 12:51 am Image
      Image

      Los Santos Police Department

      ARREST REPORT
      "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

      MUGSHOT
      • SUSPECT DETAILS
        • Full Name: Tanaka Iganawa
          Phone Number: 4068585
          Licenses Suspended: No
          Officers Involved:
          • Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy
          • Police Cadet Coral Lafleur
          • Police Officer I Rija Luigi
          Charges:
          • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
          • WM01 - Unlawful Brandishing of a Firearm or Weapon
          • WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications
          • WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
        INCIDENT NARRATIVE
        • Explain what happened, no need to provide too much detail, videos could be provided
          • Mister Inagawa was having a silenced gun pointed at Dean Molloy in a scenario where Molloy was investigating people with guns.
        EVIDENCE DETAILS
        • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
          Legal possessions may be grouped and documented as "Legal Possessions". Illegal possessions must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
          • Exhibit A: Legal possessions
            Exhibit B: Face Mask
            Exhibit C: **Refer to Exhibit #2**
            Exhibit D: **Refer to Exhibit #2**
            Photograph of possessions in evidence locker (if applicable)
            Image
    Exhibit #2: .50 & silencer found on the suspect
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery The illegal firearm and attachment as found on the Defendant.
    • Image
    Exhibit #3: Bodycam footage Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery This bodycam footage provided by Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy clearly shows a man, dressed in white, brandishing a firearm.
    • ((
      Bodycam RP
      Image
      ))
      Bodycam footage incident
    Exhibit #4: Arrest Report 31/AUG/2022
    Type of Discovery:
    • Physical evidence
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery This arrest reports indicates that the Failure to Comply charge as mentioned in the narrative of the Defendant related to an entirely different incident of August 31, 2022.
    • Tanaka Ikagawa Arrest Report - 31/AUG/2022
      Coral Lafleur wrote: Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:31 pm Image
      Image

      Los Santos Police Department

      ARREST REPORT
      "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

      MUGSHOT
      • SUSPECT DETAILS
        • Full Name: Tanaka Inagawa
          Phone Number: 4068585
          Licenses Suspended: No
          Officers Involved:
          • Police Lieutenant II Jaxon Nash
          • Police Cadet Coral Lafleur
          • Police Officer III Dominic Ace
          Charges:
          • GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
        INCIDENT NARRATIVE
        • Explain what happened, no need to provide too much detail, videos could be provided
          • Turned himself in, places charged but another office.
        EVIDENCE DETAILS
        • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
          Legal possessions may be grouped and documented as "Legal Possessions". Illegal possessions must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
          • Exhibit A: Legal Possessions

            Photograph of possessions in evidence locker (if applicable)
            Image
      Image
    Exhibit #5: Witness Statement Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy
    Type of Discovery:
    • Witness Statement
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery This witness statement provided by Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy gives additional insight into the situation.
    • Image

      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Official Witness Statement
      "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
      Case Information
      • Incident Date: [02/SEP/2022]
      Witness Information
      • Name: [Dean Molloy]
        Date of Birth: [03/DEC/2022]
        Phone Number: [278894]
        Occupation: [Police Officer]
      Witness Statement
      • [I was directly involved in the above situation like Mr Tanaka Said.
        To bring a bit more light on this case, Mr. Tanaka and his friends were suspected of robbing a bank and they were actively chased and followed through the city by multiple units in Tac.
        We found Mr Tanaka and other affiliates' vehicles at the apartment building, seconds when i noticed another individual next to a black buffalo STX. As the man had a mask on I asked him to remove the mask and show me his license, when 2 individuals come down the stairs with silenced .50s in their hands and i drive off calling for backup, wich you will clearly see in the bodycam footage
        Now Mr Tanaka made this appeal thinking that is allowed to defend his property with an illegal firearm with a silencer on it, he directly lied in the appeal saying that ''people dressed in black with guns where there and the Leo`s ignored them and decided to arrest him.
        You can clearly see that the other individual carrying an illegal firearm was his friend coming out in the same time at him and leaving in the same time as him
        Due to the fact that we already had a TAC situation opened units chased the vehicle leaving the scene and one of them was the Buffalo STX Mr Tanaka.
        The individual was asked to get out of the vehicle and was very aggressive when i did that, acting very erratically, the clothing he had on him matched 100% with the individual brandishing the weapon and we never lost sight of the vehicle after they left the scene.
        Mr. Tanka was found in possession of an illegal.50 pistol with a silencer on it and was charged accordingly
        Bodycam ]
      Witness Affirmation
      • I, [Dean Molloy], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

        Signed,

        Kind Regards,
        Image
        Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy
        Firearms Licensing Division,
        Los Santos Police Department
        Date: [13/SEP/2022]
      Image
    Exhibit #6: Witness Statement Lieutenant I Jonathan Willowick
    Type of Discovery:
    • Witness Statement
    Spoiler
    All Information from the Discovery This witness statement provided by Lieutenant I Jonathan Willowick gives additional insight into the situation.
    • Image

      San Andreas Judicial Branch
      Official Witness Statement
      "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
      Case Information
      • Incident Date: [01/SEP/2022]
      Witness Information
      • Name: [Jonathan Willowick]
        Date of Birth: [09/AUG/1987]
        Phone Number: [413-4102]
        Occupation: [LSPD]
      Witness Statement
      • [We arrived on a scene in front of an apartment complex and Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy mentioned that he seen the suspect pointing a weapon at a man who he believed to have been trying to break into his car. The man was detained from Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy about the weapon, and he was searched and the weapon was recovered, while suspect was arrested for it. I personally did not see this but verified with the Officer that he indeed did, and had it on body camera. ]
      Witness Affirmation
      • I, [Jonathan Willowick], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

        Signed,


        Police LieutenantI Jonathan Willowick
        Commanding Officer, Major Crimes Division
        Los Santos Police Department
        Date: [01/JAN/2000]
      Image


Sincerely,


Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Motion for Continuance
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Continuance

Honorable Daniels,

  • We the Prosecution in the case below are requesting a Continuance for 7 days after the return of the Prosecutor for the reason listed below.
    State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
    Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0070
    Detailed explanation:
    As you are aware, I will be departing on my Leave of Absence after today. The Prosecution is intending on filing further motions and as such would like a Motion for Continuance until after a week after my Leave of Absence ends.


Sincerely,


Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Pavel Perrault
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon May 10, 2021 6:01 pm
ECRP Forum Name: DC2MT74

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Pavel Perrault »

Image

Rockford Law

#22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

  • To whom it may concern,

    First off, the defense would like to acknowledge that we are completely supportive of Mr. Marchisio's upcoming leave of absence and would like to sincerely thank him for managing to provide discovery before taking it. We the defense will also refrain from filing any motions until Mr. Marchisio is back on duty.

    Secondly, we would just like to clarify the charges being disputed in this particular case.

    We are disputing the following, all placed on September 2nd 2022.

    WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
    WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications
    WM01 - Unlawful Brandishing of a Firearm or Weapon
    GM19 - Face Concealment (b)

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Attorney
    Rockford Law
    (909) 233-8504 [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sarah Williams
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat May 01, 2021 6:10 am
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael

DOC Awards

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Sarah Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Chief Justice Daniels,

    I, Junior Prosecuting Attorney, Sarah Williams will be acting as co-counsel for the State of San Andreas, alongside Rodrick Marchisio. I have familiarized myself with the case and will be ready to assist him when he returns from his Leave of Absence.

Respectfully,
Sarah Williams
Image
Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
463-8400 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Daniels,

    The Prosecution notes that in the appeal as written by the Defendant, the charges that are being appealed are described as follows:
    Illegal Fire Arm, and im assuming failure to comply since I was attempted to fight with the cops about the reason for their search made no sense. Maybe pointing a gun at an officer since that was their claim for the search.
    Per State of San Andreas v. Brody King, while the Defendant does not have access to the MDC Mr. Inagawa had the opportunity to go to Mission Row, Paleto Station, or even the Courthouse/City Hall for clarification on what he was charged with on the day in question.

    This would lead to the following charges being appealed in the underlying case:
    • WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
    • GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
    • GM01 - Assault of a Government Employee
    In this respect, the Prosecution notes that the Defendant had not been charged with either GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify or GM01 - Assault of a Government Employee. It is therefore the opinion of the Prosecution that the charges omitted from this appeal have been abandoned and this appeal only involves the charge of WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons.

Respectfully,

Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Motion to Amend Charges
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Amend Charges

Honorable Daniels,

  • We the prosecution in the case are requesting an amendment of the charges.
    State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
    Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0070
    Requesting Party: Prosecution
    Party Members: Roderick Marchisio, Sarah Williams
    Original Charges:
    • WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
    • WM01 - Unlawful Brandishing of a Firearm or Weapon
    • WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications
    • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
    Amended Charges:
    • WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
    • WM01 - Unlawful Brandishing of a Firearm or Weapon
    • WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications
    • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
    • WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee
    • NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
    • GF24 - Perjury

    Detailed explanation:

    The Prosecution notes that, as shown in Evidence Exhibit #3 as presented previously to the court, the Defendant was involved in the assembly of two individuals that brandished illegal firearms including weapon modifications in a public street, right in front of a residential apartment complex while running at full speed towards a law enforcement officer on duty. In this respect, the Prosecution notes that an assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. Both the threat - by running at full speed towards the officer while grabbing an illegal, modified firearm - and the presentation of the ability to cause this harm are obvious. Additionally, the Prosecution notes that the Defendant was involved in the assembly of two or more individuals that displayed an act in a manner likely to terrify the general public, which is proven by the public display of firearms. Following this, the Prosecution can only conclude the actions as taken by the Defendant should result in the application of WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee and NM03 - Unlawful Assembly.

    Further, the Prosecution notes that the Defendant made the following claim in his statement:
    I run outside to defend my property people are running around with guns in BLACK not white which I WAS wearing
    With reference to the bodycam footage, it becomes abundantly clear that at the moment the Defendant and the individual next to him come running out of the apartment complex, they are the only individuals running around while brandishing (illegal and modified) firearms. Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy together with the unnamed individual are clearly stationary while no firearms are brandished. Following this, the statement as signed off by the Defendant is clearly untrue and one with the the potential of affecting the outcome of the trial. As such, the Prosecution can only conclude that the Defendant has knowingly and willfully provided false statements or information to mislead the court in the underlying case and should therefore result in the applicability of GF24 - Perjury.


Sincerely,


Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Your Honor,

    I have returned from my Leave of Absence and would like to wish to schedule the Motions hearing for the underlying case if you think this is required as the Motion to Amend Charges speaks for itself and a decision regarding which charges the Defense is allowed to appeal in the underlying case is a sole decision of the court.

Respectfully,

Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Counselors,

    Due to some recent changes to the court system we will not be holding any hearing for the motions filed and instead I will be ruling on them based on their merit here on the docket right now.

    First I would like to address the defense counsels clarification to the charges being disputed. The defendant posted their case to the docket on September 1st 2022, on October the 7th the defense counsel advised the court that they will be representing the defendant Mr. Inagawa. Then on the 25th of October, 2022 clarification was given of what charges are being disputed. As the prosecution noted, it was in the case of #22-CM-0055 San Andreas v. King that precedent was set. Due to the defendant and defense counsel not relaying to the court that they wish to clarify what charges are being disputed until almost 2 months after the initial case was filed I will only be hearing the original disputed charge of WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons.

    In regards to the Motion to Amend Charges filed by the prosecution, due to recent charges to the policy regarding this motion I will allow two of the three additional charges to be amended. That being, "WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee" as that is a felony charge, and "GF24 - Perjury" as that is a charge related to statements made to the court under penalty of perjury.

    With that being said, the following charges will be the only charges heard when this case goes to trial;
    • WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
    • WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee
    • GF24 - Perjury
    If no other motions are filed by end of day Sunday, November 27th, 2022, I will be moving to hold a trial in this case.

    Respectfully,

    Chief Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Roderick Marchisio
Posts: 6247
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 1:08 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Roderick

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Roderick Marchisio »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Daniels,

    As no other motions have been filed before Sunday, November 27th, 2022, the Prosecution would like to move forward and schedule a trial.

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Counselors,

    Due to the inactivity to the public docket I will be giving until the end of day Friday, December 16th, 2022 for either the defense attorney to make contact with the court that they wish to proceed with this case or the defendant to inform the court they wish to proceed with new counsel. If no correspondence have been made by the deadline above this case will be dismissed.

    Respectfully,

    Chief Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Dmitri Leroy
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2019 1:54 am
ECRP Forum Name: Tidus Law

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Dmitri Leroy »

Image

Rockford Law

#22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

  • Honorable Chief Justice Daniels,

    After a lengthy deliberation with the defendant in this case they have concluded that at this time they no longer wish to move forward and request its scheduled dismissal to continue as stated above. On behalf of Rockford Law I want to personally thank the court and prosecution for their time and effort into this case despite the defendants decision to not pursue.


    Respectfully,
    Image
    CEO | Rockford Law
    (909) 219-4084 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
#22-CM-0070

A decision was reached in the above case on the 16th day of December, 2022.


At the wish of the defendant I will be dismissing this case without prejudice. However, as the Judicial Branch has expended both time and resource into this case throughout the nearly two months it has been activated I will be charging the defendant with $25,000 in court fees as outlined in the court information.

This case is now closed and archived.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF REACTIVATION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
#22-CM-0070

A Notice of Reactivation was entered in the above case on the 3rd of February, 2023.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa is hereby reactivated by this Court remaining under #22-CM-0070.

Due to a ruling by the San Andreas Court of Appeals #23-AP-0002 the dismissal has been reversed and remanded back to the Superior Court under the same presiding judge. As stated in the Court of Appeals ruling, we will be once again attempting to schedule a trial within the coming days.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"



NOTICE OF SCHEDULING


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
#22-CM-0070

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on the 25th of February, 2023.


All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.




Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Dmitri Leroy
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2019 1:54 am
ECRP Forum Name: Tidus Law

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Dmitri Leroy »

Image

Rockford Law

#22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

  • To whom it may concern,

    Johnnie Everdeen will be lead in this case and I will be co-counsel. We have given our availability to the courts and await the decision for time.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    CEO | Rockford Law
    (909) 219-4084 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF TRIAL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
#22-CM-0070

A trial date was set on the above case on the 27th of Febraury, 2023.


In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 8:00 PM on the 5th of March, 2023 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding taking place they must inform the court by filing a Witness List no later than 24 hours prior to the above listed date.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancelation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Colt Daniels
Judicial Branch
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 am
ECRP Forum Name: Colt

SAJB Awards

LSSD Awards

Re: #22-CM-0070, State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa

Post by Colt Daniels »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Tanaka Inagawa
#22-CM-0070

A decision was reached in the above case on the 5th day of March, 2023.


A trial was held at Rockford Hills City Hall on the 5th of March, 2023. An abundant amount of evidence was provided during the trial and testimony was given by both sides on this case. The defense in this case announced to the court that the defendant Tanaka Inagawa is pleading guilty to the charge of WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons, therefore the prosecution and defense in this case only gave arguments regarding the two charges added by the prosecution.

In regards to the charge WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee, the court believes that the defendant in this case never pointed his firearm at Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy as shown in Exhibit #5, therefore the threat of bodily harm with the intention of attainment was not present. For the prosecution to successfully show the defendant had the intention of bodily harm on the law enforcement officer they would of had to show the defendant pointed the weapon at the officer with the intention of attaining that bodily harm. Since the defendant did not do so, as shown in Exhibit #5, the prosecution were unsuccessful in doing so.

In regards to GF24 - Perjury, the prosecution has to prove that the defendant knowingly and willfully provided false statements or information to mislead a judge and, or jury in official proceedings for or during a trial. The prosecution argued that the by the defendant stating the following during the filing of this case "I run outside to defend my property people are running around with guns in BLACK not white which I WAS wearing" he was perjuring himself as he moment the defendant and the individual next to him come running out of the apartment complex, they are the only individuals running around while brandishing (illegal and modified) firearms.

The court believes that, as shown in Exhibit #5, the defendant and one of the individuals in black were together as they seemingly came out of the apartment complex together, down the stairs together, and both drew their firearms before running towards Police Officer III+1 Dean Molloy, it was clear that they were acting together. Both the defendant and the individual in black were the only ones at this point to have any firearm drawn. Once the individual in black had pointed his firearm at the Officer Molloy, Officer Molloy fled down the street on his police bike and radioed for additional units. At that time both the individual in black and the defendant got into their respective vehicles and fled the scene.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
  • On the count of WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons, I find the defendant, Tanaka Inagawa, guilty.
  • On the count of WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee, I find the defendant, Tanaka Inagawa, not guilty.
  • On the count of GF24 - Perjury, I find the defendant, Tanaka Inagawa, guilty.




Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests