Page 1 of 1
#22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 14 Jul 2022, 01:14
by Josh Graham
Re: State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 22 Jul 2022, 19:39
by Cyrus Raven
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 31 Jul 2022, 19:28
by Judith Mason
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 31 Jul 2022, 23:20
by Cyrus Raven
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 02 Aug 2022, 00:16
by Judith Mason
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 02 Aug 2022, 00:36
by Cyrus Raven
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 10 Aug 2022, 03:15
by Albert Lewis
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 10 Aug 2022, 21:09
by Judith Mason

San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
#22-CM-0042
Presiding Judge: Judith Mason |
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
#22-CM-0042
A court order was entered in the above case on 10 August, 2022.
The case of the State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham, #22-CM-0042 is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.
The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.
Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected] 
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 16 Aug 2022, 23:06
by Albert Lewis
Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0042
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Albert "Big Al" Lewis
Exhibit #1: LSPD Officer Tyrell Lee
Type of Discovery: Arrest Record
All Information from the Discovery
Tyrell Lee wrote: ↑13 Jul 2022, 01:51


Los Santos Police Department
ARREST REPORT
"TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE" |
MUGSHOT
- SUSPECT DETAILS
-
Full Name: Josh Graham
Phone Number: 3916598
Licenses Suspended: Yes
Officers Involved:
- Police Officer II Tyrell Lee
- Police Officer II Jim Buckridge
Charges:
- VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- GM04 - Resisting Arrest
- GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
INCIDENT NARRATIVE
- Explain what happened, no need to provide too much detail, videos could be provided
- While officers were investigating a kidnapping, Mr. Graham drove up and the person who said they were kidnapped got into Mr. Graham's car and fled from the scene. My unit tried to catch up but we lost VC. After 5 minutes, we gained VC again and the pursuit ended up in the big construction building on San Andreas Ave. Both Mr. Graham and the other suspect went up the ladder and I fell from the ladder and hurt myself. When I got back after getting medical treatment, Mr. Graham was injured and I provided BLS. After getting PID, he had a suspended license.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
Legal possessions may be grouped and documented as "Legal Possessions". Illegal possessions must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
-
Exhibit A: Legal Possessions - Clothing, GPS, Knife, and Radio
Exhibit #2: LSPD Officer Silas Black
Type of Discovery: Arrest Record
All Information from the Discovery [Provide a detail explanation as to the relevance of the discovery request]
Silas Black wrote: ↑13 Jul 2022, 18:52


Los Santos Police Department
ARREST REPORT
"TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE" |
MUGSHOT
- SUSPECT DETAILS
-
Full Name: Josh Graham
Phone Number: 3916598
Licenses Suspended: No
Officers Involved:
- Police Cadet Silas Black
- Police Officer II Oli Green
Charges:
- WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Gov. Employee
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- WM02 - Possession of an Unlicensed Firearm
INCIDENT NARRATIVE
- Explain what happened, no need to provide too much detail, videos could be provided
- Mr. Graham came to Mission Row to report his BF400 stolen. Upon MDC check Mr. Graham had a warrant for his arrest for three(3) charges. The warrant was placed by Audrey Hartwell. Mr. Graham complied with all commands given and was taken into custody with out incident.
EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
Legal possessions may be grouped and documented as "Legal Possessions". Illegal possessions must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
-
Exhibit A: Exhibit A: Legal Possessions: Paisley Face Bandana, GPS, knife
Sincerely,
Albert "Big Al" Lewis

Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 464-6046 —
[email protected][/list]

Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 18 Aug 2022, 13:28
by Cyrus Raven
Motion to Dismiss
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Dismiss
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Defense in the case below are requesting case 22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham, be dismissed. Please find the reason for it below.
State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Assigned Court Case Number: 22-CM-0042
Requesting Party: Cyrus Raven
Party Members: Cyrus Raven (Attorney), Josh Graham (Defendant)
Dismissal Reason: Insufficient Evidence Provided
Detailed explanation:
On the 2nd of August, 2022, the defense clarified that the defendant intended on appealing a total of 8 charges. On the 10th of August, 2022, the court ordered discovery be provided by the prosecution of ''all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency''.
It is now the 18th of August, 2022. Given the time period for the prosecution to provide evidence for all 8 charges has elapsed, the defense is requesting the court dismiss the 8 charges due to lack of evidence.
The prosecution has provided two single arrest reports.
Exhibit #1 is with regards to four charges. It contains a 5 sentence statement on what led to the arrest. Granted, arrest reports are not suppose to be super detailed, but no other corroborating evidence, witness statement or body-cam has been provided, despite other units being involved. Furthermore, the person writing this arrest report states ''I fell from the ladder and hurt myself. When I got back after getting medical treatment'' and ''While officers were investigating a kidnapping'', implying he was not the initiating unit of the situation nor was he around for a significant portion of it due to his injuries.
Exhibit #2 is with regards to three charges. It provides no statements on the charges or what circumstances led to the defendant being charged, instead if describes the defendant at Mission Row and the arresting Officer detaining and arresting him due to the charges placed by Deputy Hartwell.
Furthermore, my client was charged with eight crimes, despite the arrest reports only listing seven charges. Likewise, ''WM02 - Possession of an Unlicensed Firearm'' was given, despite no evidence of a weapon in either exhibits.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,

Cyrus Raven
Public Defense Attorney

Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 21 Aug 2022, 00:38
by Judith Mason


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
- Parties,
As discussed in the Motions Hearing held late in the day on August 20th, 2022, the prosecution's Motion for Discovery of Two Arrest Reports provided by the Los Santos Police Department was granted before conversations turned to the Motion to Dismiss submitted by the defense.
During this discussion, the defense claimed that there is not enough evidence to proceed with any of the charges brought forth by the prosecution.
Prosecution agreed that there is an insufficient amount of evidence for a number of charges, and as such, was receptive to dropping those claims while still intending on pursuing the VF01 - Evading an Officer charge with timestamp 13/JUL/2022 01:27:14 and the VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License charge with timestamp 13/JUL/2022 01:27:14.
While the defense asserts that the evidence for the two remaining charges is weak and they should be thrown out regardless, the court made a determination not to dismiss the remaining charges so that a final attempt to collect statements of law enforcement officers involved could be made. Should further evidence be presented within the next 48 hours, the court will make arrangements to schedule a trial, but if not, the court will be open to hearing an additional Motion to Dismiss for those remaining charges.
To summarize, the following charges have been dropped by the prosecution and are no longer being pursued:
- WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee (Timestamp 13/JUL/2022 17:56:22)
- WM02 - Possession of an Unlicensed Firearm (Timestamp 13/JUL/2022 17:56:22)
- VF01 - Evading an Officer (Timestamp 13/JUL/2022 17:56:22)
- GM13 - Criminal Threats of a Government Employee (Timestamp 13/JUL/2022 01:42:23)
- GM14 - Obstruction of Justice (Timestamp 13/JUL/2022 01:27:14)
- GM04 - Resisting Arrest (Timestamp 13/JUL/2022 01:27:14)
Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 23 Aug 2022, 17:58
by Cyrus Raven
Motion to Dismiss
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Dismiss
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Defense in the case below are requesting case 22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham, be dismissed. Please find the reason for it below.
State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Assigned Court Case Number: 22-CM-0042
Requesting Party: Cyrus Raven
Party Members: Cyrus Raven (Attorney), Josh Graham (Defendant)
Dismissal Reason: Insufficient Evidence Provided for two outstanding charges
Detailed explanation:
The 48 hour time period allowed by the court has elapsed, as such the Defense requests that the two outstanding charges:
- VF01 - Evading an Officer
- VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
also be dropped due to lack of evidence and a not-guilty verdict be issued.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,

Cyrus Raven
Public Defense Attorney

Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 30 Aug 2022, 22:00
by Albert Lewis
Re: #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
Posted: 01 Sep 2022, 00:30
by Judith Mason

San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
COURT DECISION - #22-CM-0042
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham
#22-CM-0042
CHARGES BEING DISPUTED:
GM04 - Resisting Arrest
VM02 - Operating a Vehicle with a Suspended License
GM14 - Obstruction of Justice
VF01 - Evading an Officer
GM13 - Criminal Threats of a Government Employee
VF01 - Evading an Officer
WM02 - Possession of an Unlicensed Firearm
WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon of a Government Employee
A decision was reached in the above case on the 1st day of September, 2022.
- The case of #22-CM-0042, State of San Andreas v. Josh Graham has hereby been dismissed by this court.
With the State's decision to no longer pursue the charges being disputed, the court is dismissing the case against Mr. Josh Graham without prejudice. Should additional evidence be uncovered to prove the defendant's guilt, the State may seek prosecution of Mr. Graham for this incident at a later date, however, the charges currently on Mr. Graham's record will be expunged and he will be compensated for fines paid and time served.

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
