#22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Locked
Naomi Mizuno
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed May 05, 2021 3:07 am
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael

#22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Naomi Mizuno »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Naomi Mizuno
Defendant Phone: 292-1448
Defendant Address: 24 Spanish Ave
(( Defendant Discord: Iriael#7569))
Requested Attorney: Cyrus Raven
Image
Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department
Image
Time & Date of Incident(s): 21/JUN/2022 ~10 PM
Charge(s):
WF03 Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
GM04 Resisting Arrest
GM19 Face Concealment (b)
GM10 Failure to Comply / Identify
GM01 Assault of a Government Employee
Accessory to VF02 Felony Hit & Run of a Government Employee
VF01 Evading an Officer

Narrative:

I, Naomi Mizuno, was unlawfully searched and detained for leaving public property. I drove up to Burgershot on my Vortex, and I had just bought a hotdog from Burgershot, and was leaving BurgerShot. At this time an officer tased me forcefully off my bike. I hit the ground, and expressed I was trying to leave with my mask on, which the officers insisted was failure to comply. At this time I was attempted to be illegally detained and cuffed. In a moment of panic I hit the taser away and ran to a friend's vehicle. I was texted to turn myself in, in which I did so at Weazel News when reading my phone. My bike should have never been searched, and these charges should have never amounted to anything more than a possible GC04 charge for forgetting to take of a mask while ordering food.

Furthermore, I have no idea how I was charged with "Accessory to VF02 Felony Hit & Run of a Government Employee" as nobody was injured let alone killed in this whole incident.

I, [Naomi Mizuno], hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Last edited by Naomi Mizuno on Wed Jul 20, 2022 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Darcy Valor
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2021 3:36 am
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Darcy Valor »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To Whom it may concern,

    I will be the presiding Judge on this case and activating it under docket number 22-CM-0037.

    At this time will Executive Defense Attorney @Dakota Macaw and Attorney General @Hugh Allgood assign attorneys to this case so we can move on to the Discovery Phase.

    Respectfully,
    Image
    Darcy Valor
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 241-7634 — [email protected]
Image
Darcy Valor
Superior Court Judge
Training & Hiring Staff
Bar Ethics Review Board
Naomi Mizuno
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed May 05, 2021 3:07 am
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Naomi Mizuno »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Valor,

    Now that the case is moving forward, I would like to respectfully request Junior Defense Attorney Cyrus Raven, as part of my legal team for this case. To my knowledge there is not an appropriate motion for representation requests, so I am making this known on the docket this way.

    Naomi Mizuno
    United People's Ground Movement
Image
User avatar
Cyrus Raven
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:14 pm
ECRP Forum Name: Cyrus Raven

LSPD Awards for Service

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Cyrus Raven »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honourable Darcy Valor,

    I, Public Defense Attorney Cyrus Raven, will be representing the defendant, Naomi Mizuno, in this case. I have made myself aware of the contents of this case and am ready to proceed.


    Respectfully,


    Image
    Public Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    5356160 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Kendall Groyce
Judicial Branch
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:18 pm
ECRP Forum Name: idgafashlee

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Kendall Groyce »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To whom it may concern,

    In regards to the court; I, prosecuting attorney Kendall Frances, will be prosecuting this case on behalf of the San Andreas State.

    Respectfully,
    Kendall Frances
    Image
    Prosecuting Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 489-9881 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Darcy Valor
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2021 3:36 am
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Darcy Valor »

Image




San Andreas Judicial Branch

"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"


#22-CM-0037
Presiding Judge: Darcy Valor

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
#22-CM-0037

A court order was entered in the above case on July 28th, 2022.


The case of the State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno, #22-CM-0037 is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.



Image
Darcy Valor
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 241-7634 — [email protected]

Image
Darcy Valor
Superior Court Judge
Training & Hiring Staff
Bar Ethics Review Board
User avatar
Robert Winejudge
Judicial Branch
Posts: 442
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 10:37 pm
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Robert Winejudge »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • To whom it may concern,

    I, Junior Attorney Robert Winejudge will be acting as co-counsel to Defense Attorney Cyrus Raven in this case, representing Naomi Mizuno. I have made myself aware of the contents of the case, and I'm ready to proceed at the court's discretion.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Junior Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 372-4223 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Kendall Groyce
Judicial Branch
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:18 pm
ECRP Forum Name: idgafashlee

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Kendall Groyce »

Motion for Continuance
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Continuance

Honorable Darcy Valor,

  • We the Prosecution in the case below are requesting a Continuance for 72 hours for the reason listed below.
    State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
    Assigned Court Case Number: 22-CM-0037
    Requesting Party: Superior Court of San Andreas
    Party Members: Kendall Frances
    Detailed explanation:

    Additional time is required to thoroughly gather any and all evidence from LSPD, we would like to officially enter this case into a continuance to have time to gather what pieces we still require. ((The new system to obtain evidence from PD doesn't have an option to paste reports with the format given, for this reason I'll have to obtain reports via email for formatting purposes so that it's not a total mess or a super zoomed out screenshot when it's placed in the docket.))


Sincerely,
Kendall Frances
Image
Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Image
Last edited by Kendall Groyce on Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Darcy Valor
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2021 3:36 am
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Darcy Valor »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Parties,

    I will be granting the Motion for Continuance, submitted by the Prosecution, for 7 days.


    Respectfully,
    Image
    Darcy Valor
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 241-7634 — [email protected]
Image
Darcy Valor
Superior Court Judge
Training & Hiring Staff
Bar Ethics Review Board
User avatar
Kendall Groyce
Judicial Branch
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:18 pm
ECRP Forum Name: idgafashlee

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Kendall Groyce »

Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Darcy Valor,

  • We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
    State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
    Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0037
    Requesting Party: Superior Court of San Andreas
    Party Members: Kendall Frances
    Exhibit #1: LSPD
    Type of Discovery: Arrest Report
    Spoiler
    Image
    • Spoiler
      ((Photo of the evidence within locker, as it was unobtainable through the screenshot))
      Image
    Exhibit #2: LSPD Officer Callum James
    Type of Discovery: Personal Statement
    • Personal Statement from arresting officer Callum James, and why the charges he placed were put forth.
    Spoiler
    Image




Sincerely,

Image
Kendall Frances
Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Image
Last edited by Kendall Groyce on Wed Aug 10, 2022 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kendall Groyce
Judicial Branch
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:18 pm
ECRP Forum Name: idgafashlee

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Kendall Groyce »

Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Darcy Valor,

  • We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
    State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
    Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0037
    Requesting Party: Superior Court of San Andreas
    Party Members: Kendall Frances
    Exhibit #3: LSPD Officer Alexander Xavier
    Type of Discovery: Personal Statement
    • Personal statement from officer Alexander Xavier, who was involved in the arrest of Ms. Mizuno. Statement details his involvement in the arrest and what he witnessed during such.
    Spoiler
    Image



    Sincerely,

    Image
    Kendall Frances
    Prosecuting Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
Image
Last edited by Kendall Groyce on Tue Aug 16, 2022 10:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kendall Groyce
Judicial Branch
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:18 pm
ECRP Forum Name: idgafashlee

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Kendall Groyce »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Valor,

    The parties have reached an agreement, and would like to proceed with arrangements of a plea deal. As such, we are ready to proceed with the court, and finalize the deal when you return from LOA.

    Respectfully,
    Kendall Frances
    Image
    Prosecuting Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 489-9881 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Darcy Valor
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2021 3:36 am
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Darcy Valor »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Parties,

    The next step is a Plea Hearing, please use this scheduling tool.


    Respectfully,
    Image
    Darcy Valor
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 241-7634 — [email protected]
Image
Darcy Valor
Superior Court Judge
Training & Hiring Staff
Bar Ethics Review Board
User avatar
Darcy Valor
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2021 3:36 am
ECRP Forum Name:

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Darcy Valor »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Re: State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Parties,

    The plea hearing will be held today, AUG 24, at approximately 10:45PM.


    Respectfully,
    Image
    Darcy Valor
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 241-7634 — [email protected]
Image
Darcy Valor
Superior Court Judge
Training & Hiring Staff
Bar Ethics Review Board
User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2589
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Judith Mason »

Document 1 | Filed 08/AUG/2022 | Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS



  • Docket Number:
    #22-CM-0037
    Date Filed:
    21/JUN/2022
    Violations:
    WF03
    GM04
    GM19
    GM10
    GM01
    Accessory to VF02
    VF01
    State of San Andreas

    v.

    Naomi Mizuno


PLEA AGREEMENT


  • Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno; Prosecuting Attorney Kendall Frances, Public Defense Attorney Cyrus Raven, Public Defense Attorney Robert Winejudge and the defendant, Naomi Mizuno, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
    1. Current Charges
      1. WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
      2. GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      3. GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
      4. VF01 - Evading an Officer
    2. Former Charges
      The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
      1. WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
      2. GM04 - Resisting Arrest
      3. GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      4. GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
      5. GM01 - Assault of a Government Employee
      6. Accessory to VF02 - Felony Hit & Run of a Government Employee
      7. VF01 - Evading an Officer
    3. General Provisions
      • The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
    4. Waiver of Rights
      • It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.

        This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of an defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.

        By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.


    Kendall Frances
    Prosecuting Attorney Kendall Frances
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 08/AUG/2022

    Robert Winejudge
    Public Defense Attorney Robert Winejudge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 08/AUG/2022

    Cyrus Raven
    Public Defense Attorney Cyrus Raven
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 08/AUG/2022

    Naomi Mizuno
    Naomi Mizuno
    Defendant
    Date Signed: 08/AUG/2022

    Darcy Valor
    Honorable Darcy Valor
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Date Signed: 08/AUG/2022

User avatar
Judith Mason
Judicial Branch
Posts: 2589
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 3:11 am
ECRP Forum Name: Judge Judy

SAJB Awards

Re: #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno

Post by Judith Mason »

Image
Form 3.0.5 - Issuance of Verdict


San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT - 22-CM-0037


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno
22-CM-0037

CHARGES BEING DISPUTED:
WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons
GM04 - Resisting Arrest
GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
GM01 - Assault of a Government Employee
Accessory to VF02 - Felony Hit & Run of a Government Employee
VF01 - Evading an Officer

A verdict was entered in the above case on the 8th day of August, 2022.


  • The case of #22-CM-0037, State of San Andreas v. Naomi Mizuno has been resolved.

    A plea agreement signed by all parties has been accepted by the court. As outlined in the full agreement, the prosecution has agreed to drop the GM04 - Resisting Arrest, GM01 - Assault of a Government Employee, and Accessory to VF02 - Felony Hit & Run of a Government Employee charges in exchange for the defendant's guilty plea for the WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons, GM19 - Face Concealment (b), GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify, and VF01 - Evading an Officer charges.

    It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
    • On the count of WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons, I find the defendant, Naomi Mizuno, guilty.
    • On the count of GM19 - Face Concealment (b), I find the defendant, Naomi Mizuno, guilty.
    • On the count of GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify, I find the defendant, Naomi Mizuno, guilty.
    • On the count of VF01 - Evading an Officer, I find the defendant, Naomi Mizuno, guilty.


    Image
    Associate Justice
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests