Eclipse Government

Posted: **05 Jun 2022, 19:15**

Defendant Name: Timmy Rueso
Defendant Phone: 4294689
Defendant Address: NA
(( Defendant Discord: )) imtyler#1677
Requested Attorney: N/A if none Dakota Macaw

Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department

Time & Date of Incident(s): 04/06/22 Around 22:00 CEST
Charge(s): Possession of human meat
Narrative: On the day of 04/6/22 i was selling tacos out of a taco truck. Starting this job was never my intention to make money so i lowered my prices to just 100 a taco. I grabbed a taco mask and changed my shirt to a yellow shirt. I started at the north part of the city but did not find many people, so i went south to the car show. At the time there was a car show being hosted and i sold all my tacos from the truck to the gentleman there.

Once i was out i went back to the area of the taco job to grab more tacos and one i had more i seen a road crew on the side of the road. I stopped to offer them some food and give them a opportunity to buy some. When i noticed they wasn't interested and the job was over i was down the road from the burgershot. I drove over there and noticed a white vehicle with a man in a suit with a mask on. I didn't want to park in front of him so i parked on the road away from any vehicles near the restaurant. I got out of the vehicle and turned off the engine but had to leave the vehicle unlocked so i could open the side of the vehicle that allows you to see what we have to offer.The gentleman i seen then came up to me and ordered a taco. I gave him one " but he did not buy one from the truck".

After noticing that some people was interested in buying my tacos the burgershot employees started harassing me and beating on my vehicle. They even got in my vehicle but was unable to start the vehicle as they did not have any keys. At this point it was my discretion to leave the area for my own safety. At this point a cop pulled behind me and stopped me. I immediately pulled off my mask before he even approached, i did not want there to be any issues with the police. The officer asked for ID i simply asked why i was being pulled over as i knew it was almost impossible to speed in that taco truck. He did not give me a reason and just stated i was apart of a ongoing investigation.

After i gave the officer my ID he immediately pulled me out of the car and read me my rights. At the point i requested a lawyer because i had no idea what was going on. He told me that they received a 911 call about me selling human meat. I told them where i was in the last minutes and where i had sold my tacos. At no time was i wearing gloves or even had a weapon on me. He then detained me and cuffed me and searched the vehicle. The officers did find the human meat that they received a call about. I informed them i didn't even know you could store items in that truck that wasn't tacos. At the time there was two burgershot employees on scene witnessing this and recording as they was mocking me.

Once the detective arrived on scene about five minutes after being in a car i stated i have no idea how that got in there and there was other people in my truck. I tried to get him to run prints or check cameras but he would not do so. There was no investigation as to how that meat ended up in that truck. But the detective did state he seen other people in my vehicle he just didn't see them store anything in it. I explained that really weird eye sight you have but its good you seen them in my vehicle. I also tried to explain to the officer that if i knew i had that on my why would i stop? Is it not reasonable that someone being attacked inst going to search there vehicle before they leave? nothing came of this.

The officer who filed the report is Luca Andollini, I did not receive the detectives name.

I, [ Timmy Rueso ], hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

Posted: **21 Jun 2022, 20:09**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

To whom it may concern ,

My name is Rasheed Briggs, and I will be representing the Los Santos Police Department. My co-counsel will be Junior Attorney Butanovich.

Respectfully,

Rasheed Briggs
Prosecution Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 315-6127 — [email protected]

Posted: **21 Jun 2022, 20:11**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Personal Email
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

To Whom It May Concern,

I am Junior Prosecuting Attorney Alex Butanovich and I will be representing Los Santos Police Department as a co-counsel.
Respectfully,

Junior Attorney Alex Butanovich
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-9773 — [email protected]

Posted: **27 Jun 2022, 03:22**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

To whom it may concern,

I am activating this case under docket number #22-CM-0028. At this time I need confirmation from Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw if he is going to be representing Mr. Rueso as requested or assigning a different attorney on the case. Once I can confirm all parties are represented I will be ordering discovery. Thank you.

Respectfully,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

Posted: **27 Jun 2022, 17:08**

San Andreas Judicial Branch

"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Court

This is Dakota Macaw, the Executive Defense Attorney of the State of San Andreas. I have made myself aware of the contents of the case and am ready to proceed at the court's discretion.

Graciously,

Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 419-3141 — [email protected]

Posted: **27 Jun 2022, 19:11**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Respectable Members of the Court,

I, 6-JB-54 Peit Vanniekerk, will be providing co-counsel to the Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw on this case as a Junior Defense Attorney. I have made myself aware of the contents of the case and am ready to proceed at the court's discretion.

Respectfully,

Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 485-1978 — [email protected]

Posted: **28 Jun 2022, 00:57**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

#22-CM-0028
Presiding Judge: Colt Daniels

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
#22-CM-0028

A court order was entered in the above case on the 28th of June, 2022.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso, #22-CM-0028 is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once the evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

Posted: **30 Jun 2022, 23:06**

Motion for Discovery

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Daniels,

We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
Assigned Court Case Number: 22-CM-0028
Requesting Party: N/A
Party Members: N/A
Exhibit #1: LSPD
Type of Discovery:
- Arrest Report
Spoiler
All Information from the Discovery
- Police Officer II Luca Andollini wrote:
  
  Los Santos Police Department
  ARREST REPORT
  "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"
  
  MUGSHOT
  SUSPECT DETAILS
  
  Full Name: Timmy Rueso
  Phone Number: 4294689
  Licenses Suspended: No
  Officers Involved:
  
  Police Detective I Tom Ardizzo
  
  Police Officer I Luca Andollini
  
  Charges:
  
  GF20 - Possession of Human Body Tissue
  
  INCIDENT NARRATIVE
  
  Explain what happened, no need to provide too much detail, videos could be provided
  
  On the night of 4th of June, after receiving a 911 call about someone selling human meat tacos at Burgershot, my unit responded. Upon arriving at Burgershot, Taco truck was seen leaving the area. I immediately turned around and attempted to follow the taco truck. Truck stopped at the San Andreas Ave, under the La Puerta Freeway. Investigation was conducted after Mr. Rueso was identified. During the search of the taco truck, 6 pieces of meat were found. I called in for MD forensics but there were none on shift. Couple of minutes later, detective Ardizzo arrived at the location and took a look at the meat. He confirmed it was human meat. Mr. Rueso was stating that he did not put the meat inside the truck. Nevertheless, the person is responsible for the belongings inside the vehicle that is registered to them and being driven by them. He was charged accordingly.
  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS
  
  Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
  Legal possessions may be grouped and documented as "Legal Possessions". Illegal possessions must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
  
  Exhibit A: Legal possesions
  Exhibit B: 6 pieces of human body tissue
  
  Photograph of possessions in evidence locker (if applicable)
Exhibit #2: LSPD
Type of Discovery:
- Written Statement from Police Detective I Tom Ardizzo
Spoiler
All Information from the Discovery
- Police Detective I Tom Ardizzo wrote: ↑24 Jun 2022, 02:21
  
  Los Santos Police Department
  RE: Prosecution Inquiry
  "TO PROTECT AND SERVE"
  
  Hello Junior Attorney Alex Butanovich,
  
  I hope all is well.
  
  This is a pretty simple case. I was the highest-ranking officer on scene, and ultimately the arrest was my call. My statement for the arrest of Timmy Rueso, is as follows:
  
  Dispatch received multiple 911 calls, regarding a man driving around in a taco truck selling human meat, by Burgershot. Timmy Rueso was seen by me (I was undercover at the time), driving around Burgershot in a taco truck. Timmy then drove away from Burgershot, and shortly after was pulled over by officer Andollini on Ginger St. Officer Andollini asked for permission to search the taco truck driven by Timmy Rueso. Timmy consented to the search. When officer Andollini searched the taco truck, six pieces of human meat were found in the taco truck. Timmy was then placed under arrest.
  
  Yes. I have bodycamera footage, but nothing in it is really applicable to the investigation. Let me know if you still want me to send it over. Please let me know if you need anything further.
  
  Thank You,
  
  Police Detective I Tom Ardizzo
  Robbery-Homicide Detective, Major Crimes Division
  Los Santos Police Department
  69 Sinner Street | Los Santos, SA, 90013
  T: 477-5948 | E: [email protected]

Sincerely,

Alex Butanovich
Junior Prosecuting Attorney

Posted: **01 Jul 2022, 04:29**

Motion to Compel Discovery

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery

Honorable Judge Colt Daniels,

We the Defense in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following material by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0028
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members:
Junior Defense Attorney Peit Vanniekerk
Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw
Discovery from: LSPD

Type of Discovery:
- Body Camera Footage
Detailed reasoning:
- The footage provided by the officers on the scene would provide us with a clear understanding of what transpired and the motives to searching the defendants vehicles as well as an probable cause that may have transpired before, during and after the interaction and arrest.

Sincerely,

Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 485-1978 — [email protected][/list]

Posted: **02 Jul 2022, 20:42**

Motion for Discovery

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Daniels,

We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
Assigned Court Case Number: 22-CM-0028
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Timmy Rueso presented by Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw together with Junior Defense Attorney Peit Vanniekerk
Exhibit #1: LSPD
Type of Discovery:
- Bodycam Footage from Police Detective I Tom Ardizzo
Spoiler
All Information from the Discovery
- Tom Ardizzo wrote: ↑02 Jul 2022, 02:01
  
  Los Santos Police Department
  Personal Email
  "TO PROTECT AND SERVE"
  
  Hello Attorney Alex Butanovich,
  
  Sure. In relation to the arrest of Timmy Rueso, please see my body camera footage here.
  ((Body Camera RP))
  
  Please let me know if you need anything further.
  
  Thank You,
  
  Police Detective I Tom Ardizzo
  Robbery-Homicide Detective, Major Crimes Division
  Los Santos Police Department
  69 Sinner Street | Los Santos, SA, 90013
  T: 477-5948 | E: [email protected]

Sincerely,

Alex Butanovich
Junior Prosecuting Attorney

Posted: **03 Jul 2022, 13:27**

Motion to Compel Discovery

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery

Honorable Judge Colt Daniels,

We the Defense in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following two materials by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0028
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members:
Junior Attorney Peit Vanniekerk
Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw
Discovery from: LSPD

Type of Discovery:
- Body Camera Footage of Detaining Officer
Detailed reasoning: [Provide a detail explanation as to the relevance of the discovery request]
- We need to see the body camera footage of the original detaining officer to provide us with a clear understanding of what transpired and the motives to searching the defendants vehicles as well as an probable cause that may have transpired before, during and after the interaction and arrest as the footage given by Detective Tom Ardizzo does not show the original stopping and detaining of the defendant.
Discovery from: LSEMS

Type of Discovery:
- DNA Test of Confiscated Meat
Detailed reasoning:
- We would like to see the DNA test regarding the meat sample taken during the search proving that it is human meat. As the assertation that the meat was human a test would have been conducted by a medical professional before arresting our client.
Sincerely,

Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 485-1978 — [email protected]

Posted: **06 Jul 2022, 01:03**

Motion for Discovery

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery

Honorable Daniels,

We the Prosecution in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
Assigned Court Case Number: 22-CM-0028
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Timmy Rueso, Junior Defense Attorney Peit Vanniekerk, Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw
Exhibit #1: LSEMS
Type of Discovery:
- Forensics Report
Spoiler
All Information from the Discovery
- Deputy Chief of LSEMS Alex Mpache wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022, 00:54
  
  Los Santos Emergency Medical Services
  Forensics report statement
  06/JUL/2022
  
  Greetings!
  May this email find you in great health.
  
  Below you will find the completed forensic report.
  
  ► Show Spoiler
  
  Serologist: Alex Mpache
  
  Date: 06/JUL/2022
  
  Requesting department: Judicial Branch
  
  Evidence reference: Flesh suspected human in origin, in LSPD's possession.
  
  Forensic report: LSEMS were contacted by Mr. Butanovich to perform forensic analysis of some flesh samples, suspected to be human in origin.
  We ventured out to MRPD, to be granted access to the evidence locker. I took a sample of the flesh, sealed it, and then took it to Pillbox MD's Forensic Lab.
  The sample was mixed in with a solution of lysis and proteinase K, after which it was placed into a centrifuge, then subsequently into a PCR machine, and then the chart was compared to known human DNA charts.
  The DNA Charts and the analyzed sample were matching enough to conclude that the analyzed sample is of human origin.
  
  Alex Mpache
  Forensic Serologist
  Deputy Chief of EMS
  Los Santos Emergency Medical Services
  
  Kind regards,
  
  Alex Mpache
  Deputy Chief of EMS
  Los Santos Emergency Medical Services
-
When it comes to the bodycam footage of arresting officer Luca Andollini, it is not existant. We in the prosecution believe that bodycam footage from detective Ardizzo would be sufficient.

Sincerely,

Alex Butanovich
Junior Prosecuting Attorney

Posted: **06 Jul 2022, 06:22**

Motion to Suppress

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Suppress

Honorable Judge Colt Daniels,

We the Defense in the case below are requesting that certain evidence be inadmissible in court.
State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0028
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members:
Junior Defense Attorney Peit Vanniekerk
Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw
Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit 1B - 6 pieces of human body tissue
Detailed explanation:
We the defense believe that these peices of evidence were not obtained lawfully or under any means of reasonable suspicion. There is no active evidence that proves our client, Timmy Rueso, allowed the officers to search the vehicle as the Police report filed by Officer Luca Andollini does not confirm concent to the search.

There is also no body camera footage of the detaining officer to prove my clients consent of the search and Detective Tom Ardizzo's body camera footage shows that he was not present during the detainment and search and thus has no transparent insight into the perspective of the evidence having been lawfully obtained and finally there was no active warrent obtained to search my clients taco truck.

To further iterate, it is not unreasonable to have meat in a taco truck nor was there any unreasonable suspicion to search the vehicle from the evidence currently presented.

With these points, we believe that this evidence be be inadmissable as it was unlawfully obtained.

Respectfully,

Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 485-1978 — [email protected][/list]

Posted: **10 Jul 2022, 00:29**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Parties,

I now wish to schedule a motions hearing for this case. Please file you availability on the scheduling tool and I will pick a time that works for all parties.

Respectfully,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

Posted: **14 Jul 2022, 23:22**

Motion to Stay Pending Appeal

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Stay Pending Appeal

Honorable Justice Colt Daniels,

We the Defense in the case below are requesting a stay pending appeal.
State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
Assigned Court Case Number: #22-CM-0028
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Timmy Rueso, Dakota Macaw, Peit Vanniekerk
Reasoning: Active Appeal
Detailed explanation:
The defense has filed an active pre-verdict appeal for a motion in this case, found here.
Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Dakota Macaw
Executive Defense Attorney,
San Andreas Judicial Branch

Posted: **04 Aug 2022, 21:36**

Motion for Summary Judgment

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Summary Judgment

Honorable Daniels,

We the Prosecution in the case below are requesting a summary judgment.
State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
Assigned Court Case Number: 22-CM-0028
Requesting Party: The Prosecution
Party Members: Junior Prosecuting Attorney Alex Butanovich
Reasoning: The proseuction is willing to drop the pursuing charges.
Detailed explanation:
This case has already been active for months. The prosecution put in a lot of effort into investigating and collecting all possible evidence. From our current position, we believe that we do not posses right amount of evidence to continue pursuing the disputed charges. All evidence we have that the search was conducted lawfully is just hear-say. The prosecution is not willing to continue with this case by just using statements and speculations. The prosecution tried reaching out the defense party to offer a plea deal, but we have been turned down. Dropping the charges isn't much different than the plea deal we offered.

Given what is said, the prosecution would like to drop the charges as we believe it's in the best interest of this government and it's resources.
Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Alex Butanovich
Junior Prosecuting Attorney

Posted: **04 Aug 2022, 22:02**

San Andreas Judicial Branch

"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Court

This is Dakota Macaw, the Executive Defense Attorney of the State of San Andreas. The defense would like to retract the previous motion to stay in favor of hearing the motion for summary judgement if the court will allow.

Graciously,

Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 419-3141 — [email protected]

Posted: **08 Aug 2022, 02:06**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Parties,

I understand that the defense wishes to retract the Motion to Stay Pending Appeal and proceed forward with the case based on the Motion for Summary Judgement filed from the prosecution. At this time I move to hear this at a hearing. Please use the following scheduling tool and once completed I will let it be known when that hearing will take place.

Respectfully,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

Posted: **09 Aug 2022, 20:42**

Your Honor,

I will be unable to attend any of the above dates due to my active LOA. I see no issues with the hearing moving forward without my presence, though.

Thank you,

-Executive Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw

Posted: **09 Aug 2022, 23:44**

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Parties,

This hearing is being scheduled for Friday August 12th, at 10:00PM. ((UTC))

Respectfully,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

Posted: **12 Aug 2022, 22:40**

Form 3.0.5 - Issuance of Verdict

San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT - 22-CM-0028

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso
22-CM-0028

CHARGES BEING DISPUTED:
GF20 - Possession of Human Body Tissue

A verdict was entered in the above case on the 12th day of August, 2022.

The case of 22-CM-0028 - State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso has hereby been resolved.

A motion for Summary Judgement was filed on the docket on August 4th, at hearing this motion was denied and a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal was filed by the prosecution alleging they had no evidence to back up the charges. The defense counsel agreed with the motion and the verdict was issued. This case is now closed.
- CHARGES BEING DISPUTED:
  - GF20 - Possession of Human Body Tissue [DROPPED]
  Chief Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

Eclipse Government

#22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

#22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Motion to Compel Discovery

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Motion to Compel Discovery

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

#22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso - Motion to Suppress

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso

Re: #22-CM-0028, State of San Andreas v. Timmy Rueso