Defendant Name: DeAndre King
Defendant Phone: 3545400
Defendant Address: Arcadius Appartments
(( Defendant Discord: realAlex#0001 ))
Requested Attorney: Self-Representation
Defendant Phone: 3545400
Defendant Address: Arcadius Appartments
(( Defendant Discord: realAlex#0001 ))
Requested Attorney: Self-Representation
Charging Department: Sheriffs Department
Time & Date of Incident(s): 12/05/2022 1745
Charge(s): Reckless Operation (original reason for arrest). Possession charges for what was found on my bike and person.
Narrative: I do not dispute the fact that I was speeding, but I do dispute the fact that my driving was at any point reckless. I was keeping to the road surface at all times, did not ever get any air time and my speed was not that fast. I even stopped and paid for the toll booth, that is not the behavior of a reckless driver.
I asked the Deputy how does he justify the arrest, and he said that he clocked me going 196. Another deputy chimed in and said that if I go 80 or over the speed limit, it's reckless operation. I do not disagree with that in theory, however, in practice, I was going exactly 51 over the speed limit (this happened on a highway). This fits very comfortably into the Speeding 3rd degree charge.
The deputy then didn't even press the charge of reckless operation, but this was the charge that he used to justify the detainment, and instead placed other charges, however, I argue that if he had not tried to arrest me for a false charge, the other crimes wouldn't of happened/would not have been discovered. The subsequent search, and arrests are fruits of a poisonous tree and therefore, in my opinion, all invalid.
I, [DeAndre King], hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Charge(s): Reckless Operation (original reason for arrest). Possession charges for what was found on my bike and person.
Narrative: I do not dispute the fact that I was speeding, but I do dispute the fact that my driving was at any point reckless. I was keeping to the road surface at all times, did not ever get any air time and my speed was not that fast. I even stopped and paid for the toll booth, that is not the behavior of a reckless driver.
I asked the Deputy how does he justify the arrest, and he said that he clocked me going 196. Another deputy chimed in and said that if I go 80 or over the speed limit, it's reckless operation. I do not disagree with that in theory, however, in practice, I was going exactly 51 over the speed limit (this happened on a highway). This fits very comfortably into the Speeding 3rd degree charge.
The deputy then didn't even press the charge of reckless operation, but this was the charge that he used to justify the detainment, and instead placed other charges, however, I argue that if he had not tried to arrest me for a false charge, the other crimes wouldn't of happened/would not have been discovered. The subsequent search, and arrests are fruits of a poisonous tree and therefore, in my opinion, all invalid.
I, [DeAndre King], hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))