Page 2 of 2
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 00:51
by Jason Steel
Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Respondent in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Apellant/Plaintiff
Party Members: Police Captain II Jason Steel, Police Detective I Grace Steel
Exhibit #1: LSPD
Type of Discovery: Physical Evidence
- Written report submitted by a sworn officer about the firearm being entered into evidence, including serial number information, as requested.
All Information from the Discovery The evidence was requested by the appellant.
Pistol .50 / Hawk & Little
- Ammunition (.50): x25 / .50 AE
- Modifications: Suppressor
- Serial Number: Scratched off
- Person in Possession: Felix Noonham - 4861466
- Weapon Outcome: Destroyed : Illegal
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 23:24
by Darcy Valor
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 02 Mar 2022, 02:15
by Sai Modi
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 04 Mar 2022, 23:57
by Jason Steel
Motion for Summary Judgment
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Summary Judgment
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Respondent in the case below are requesting a summary judgment.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: N/A
Party Members: Jason Steel, Grace Steel, Sai Modi
Reasoning: The evidence when taken together shows that the actions taken by law enforcement were lawful beyond a reasonable doubt.
Detailed explanation:
A large amount of evidence, which is dated, was presented to yourself and the opposing counsel, showing the legal basis for the actions of the officers that day. It is our belief that when reviewed, they objectively show that no unlawful actions took place on that day. As the appellant already confirmed that the pistol and suppressor were found in his motorbike, and with the legality of the search being clearly proven, any other esoteric, circumstantial and speculative claims are not relevant, in our opinion, and are to be taken as beyond the scope of this appeal. We are already to expand on this verbally during a hearing, if your honor deems it acceptable.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 05 Mar 2022, 06:59
by Judith Mason


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
- Parties,
Seven days have now passed since discovery has been active, therefore I am now closing discovery and we will be moving forward by scheduling a hearing.
As this case has gotten quite large and there are number of motions, I will be holding this Discovery Hearing to determine which Motions for Discovery, Motions to Compel Discovery, and other relevant motions will be granted. I will be hearing the motions in order of submission and I am hoping to hear all motions in one session, but due to the size of this case, I am not opposed to adjourning to a second hearing, should the need arise and I grant more time for oral arguments.
Only one representative is required for either party to present oral arguments during this hearing, but if scheduling allows for both representatives from either side will be available, then that timeslot will be selected. Please use this Scheduling Tool to fill in your availability for the coming week.
Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 07 Mar 2022, 03:31
by Judith Mason
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 08 Mar 2022, 01:56
by Judith Mason


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Summary of Motions Hearing for Newnham v. LSPD
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
- Parties,
After the hearing conducted at the San Andreas Courthouse at 9pm on March 7th, 2022, the following decisions have been made:
Colt Daniels wrote: ↑03 Nov 2021, 03:30
Motion to Compel Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery
Honorable : Bret Hyland
- We the defense in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following material by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
Felix Noonham vs. The LSPD
Assigned Court Case Number: N/A
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Felix Noonham, Colt Daniels
Discovery from: The LSPD
Type of Discovery: Document Request
- The Detective Bureau Case-File used to detain the appellant.
Detailed reasoning:
- This case-file will show the legitimacy of the detention of my client & the entirety of the case is based on if the LSPD had probable cause to detain and search my client and his vehicle.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely

District Criminal Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 —
[email protected]
- This motion was later withdrawn, therefore it is dismissed.
Colt Daniels wrote: ↑09 Dec 2021, 04:33
Motion to Compel Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery
Honorable :
Judith Mason
- We the defemse in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following material by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
Felix Noonham vs. The LSPD
Assigned Court Case Number: 21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Felix Noonham, Colt Daniels
Discovery from: LSPD
Type of Discovery: Document Request
- Bodycam Footage, Officer Statements, Arrest Report, & Situation Report.
Detailed reasoning:
I would like to see the footage of how the situation unfolded and what reasoning the detectives gave Mr. Noonham to detain him and search his person and property. I would also like to have statements from the detectives and officers involved explaining their interpretations of what took place during this situation. I would also like to see all reports filed as a result of this arrest (Arrest Report and Situation Report) to see if it includes any information that would be useful to the case.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely

District Criminal Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 —
[email protected]
Jason Steel wrote: ↑26 Feb 2022, 18:00
Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Respondent in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Defendant
Party Members: Police Captain II Jason Steel, Police Detective I Grace Steel
Exhibit #1: LSPD
Type of Discovery: Physical Evidence
- Written report submitted by a sworn officer about their interaction with the appellant a short amount of time before the incident being appealed.
All Information from the Discovery This evidence is highly relevant as it occurred a short amount of time prior to the incidents that are being disputed by the appellant, and it shows the individuals disposition to flee from law enforcement, information which other officers, including Detective Steel and Captain Steel would've had access to.

Los Santos Police Department
TRAFFIC STOP REPORT
"TO PROTECT AND SERVE" |
- TRAFFIC STOP DETAILS
- Location: Bay City Avenue
Narrative: Reckless Operation
Additional Units: 23-S-2
Approx. Time and Date: 23/OCT/2021, 20:20
VEHICLE DETAILS
- Vehicle Driver: Felix Noonham
Vehicle Owner: Felix Noonham
License Plate: F3LIX
Vehicle Model: Issi Sport
Vehicle Color: Silver
Vehicle Passengers (If Applicable): N/A
TRAFFIC STOP OUTCOME
Please add a "X" all relevant areas. When issuing a citation, license suspension (length), or charge, amend "Specify" inside the parenthesis.
- Action Taken:
[ ] Verbal Warning
[ ] Citation (Specify)
[ ] Demerit
[X] License Suspension (2 days)
[X] Charge (VM03 - Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle)
- Stop Verdict:
At approximately 2015 I pulled over an individual in silver/gray Issi Sport for flying down the Bay City Avenue whilst going 158 km/h. I was suggested by an SAM unit to arrest the individual for reckless operation, considering the speed and the amount of road he was airborne. I informed individual to step out of the vehicle since he is being under arrest. After hearing those words, Felix Noonham decided to disobey my direct orders and felony evade from the scene. We initiated a pursuit in TAC 1 & requested for a high speed unit. The pursuit continued for around 20 minutes throughout the city and on Del Perro Freeway. After driving recklessly for quit a bit, suspect collided with a building and was arrested by first arriving units.

Exhibit #2: LSPD
Type of Discovery: Physical Evidence
- Picture of the appellant on the scene of his arrest on the 23rd of October, wearing extremely similar (if not identical) clothing as the day when he was searched by the defendants.
All Information from the Discovery This is supporting evidence for Exhibit #1, showcasing the defendants clothing was not a one-time fluke but a uniform that he wore proudly whenever he committed crimes against the the penal code, and which he was wearing during the incident which is being appealed.
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department
- The motion is split into two parts; the Motion for Discovery of the Prior Traffic Stop is denied and the Motion for Discovery of the Photograph is granted.
Jason Steel wrote: ↑26 Feb 2022, 18:08
Motion to Compel Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Respondent in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following material by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Defendant
Party Members: Police Captain II Jason Steel, Police Detective I Grace Steel
Discovery from: Plaintiff
Type of Discovery: Deposition
- We would like the plaintiff to clearly admit or refute the fact that, at the time of the events, he was affiliated with a criminal organization.
Detailed reasoning: [Provide a detail explanation as to the relevance of the discovery request]
- The plaintiff failed to address the accusation that he is affiliated with a criminal organization, and we believe that it is highly relevant when his initial statement is attempting to paint him as a regular citizen whom is just minding his own business, when in actuality, he was armed with a loaded firearm, with a suppressor in his possession and was sporting the uniform of a criminal organization. We believe that his membership in a criminal organization is highly relevant to the narrative being pushed by the plaintiff and we would like him to speak on record about it.
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department
Dakota Macaw wrote: ↑26 Feb 2022, 19:00
Motion to Suppress
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Suppress
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Appellant in the case below are requesting that certain evidence be inadmissible in court.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Appellant
Party Members: Felix Newnham, Dakota Macaw
Requested Evidence to Suppress: Exhibit #1 "Written report submitted by a sworn officer about their interaction with the appellant a short amount of time before the incident being appealed."
Detailed explanation:
The Appellant's previous history with law enforcement is inconsequential to the search and or seizure of the appellant's property or person. Whether or not an individual has a criminal history or not does not change the inherent protections that all citizens may enjoy when conducting their day-to-day activities. Criminal history is not admissible as sufficient probable cause, and although there are many precautions that the Police Department and law enforcement in general may take when confronting repeat-offenders, they may not conduct searches and or seizure without valid probable cause.
Sincerely,

Attorney Dakota Macaw
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 419-3141 —
[email protected]
- The motion is dismissed as the Motion for Discovery presenting the information has been denied.
Dakota Macaw wrote: ↑26 Feb 2022, 22:03
Motion to Compel Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery
Honorable Judith Mason,
- Firstly I would like to concur with the respondent's request for a hearing and look forward to meeting in hearing soon.
Before this though, we the Appellant in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following material by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Appellant
Party Members: Dakota Macaw, Felix Newnham
Discovery from: LSPD
Type of Discovery: Physical Evidence
- We the Appellant Request the firearm and all related contraband that was allegedly found in Mr. Newnham's vehicle to be submitted to evidence.
Detailed reasoning:
- As the charges that are being appealed are based off of this exact evidence, proof of their existence (and clarification of any serial numbers) will be necessary to continue with the case.
Sincerely,

Attorney Dakota Macaw
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 419-3141 —
[email protected]
Jason Steel wrote: ↑27 Feb 2022, 00:51
Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Respondent in the case below are presenting our discovery to the court.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Apellant/Plaintiff
Party Members: Police Captain II Jason Steel, Police Detective I Grace Steel
Exhibit #1: LSPD
Type of Discovery: Physical Evidence
- Written report submitted by a sworn officer about the firearm being entered into evidence, including serial number information, as requested.
All Information from the Discovery The evidence was requested by the appellant.
Pistol .50 / Hawk & Little
- Ammunition (.50): x25 / .50 AE
- Modifications: Suppressor
- Serial Number: Scratched off
- Person in Possession: Felix Noonham - 4861466
- Weapon Outcome: Destroyed : Illegal
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department
- [UNDER SEAL] Motion for Discovery - Respondent
- [UNDER SEAL] Motion to Compel Discovery - Appellant
- [UNDER SEAL] Motion to Compel Discovery - Appellant
- [UNDER SEAL] Motion to Compel Discovery - Appellant
Jason Steel wrote: ↑04 Mar 2022, 23:57
Motion for Summary Judgment
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Summary Judgment
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Respondent in the case below are requesting a summary judgment.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: N/A
Party Members: Jason Steel, Grace Steel, Sai Modi
Reasoning: The evidence when taken together shows that the actions taken by law enforcement were lawful beyond a reasonable doubt.
Detailed explanation:
A large amount of evidence, which is dated, was presented to yourself and the opposing counsel, showing the legal basis for the actions of the officers that day. It is our belief that when reviewed, they objectively show that no unlawful actions took place on that day. As the appellant already confirmed that the pistol and suppressor were found in his motorbike, and with the legality of the search being clearly proven, any other esoteric, circumstantial and speculative claims are not relevant, in our opinion, and are to be taken as beyond the scope of this appeal. We are already to expand on this verbally during a hearing, if your honor deems it acceptable.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department
Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 16 Mar 2022, 03:30
by Judith Mason
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 16 Mar 2022, 03:49
by Dakota Macaw
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 16 Mar 2022, 20:27
by Jason Steel


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
- Honorable Judith Mason,
We, the respondent, do not oppose the appellants request for an extension; We feel that a short window for additional motions would be prudent for the pursuit of justice.
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 16 Mar 2022, 21:45
by Judith Mason
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 17 Mar 2022, 22:47
by Dakota Macaw
Motion to Compel Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Compel Discovery
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Appellant in the case below are requesting the disclosure of the following material by opposing counsel, please find a detailed reason as to our request below.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Appellant
Party Members: Dakota Macaw, Darcy Lafleur, Felix Newnham
Discovery from: LSPD
Type of Discovery: Video Evidence
- We are requesting all footage of the situation in question that is available. This includes but is not limited to dashcam, bodycam, and any other recording that the LSPD is in possession of.
Detailed reasoning:
- The court previously decided that footage of the incident would be submitted so we can be more aware of the events that occurred that day.
Sincerely,

Attorney Dakota Macaw
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 419-3141 —
[email protected]

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 19 Mar 2022, 20:51
by Jason Steel
Motion for Summary Judgment
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Summary Judgment
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Prosecution in the case below are requesting a summary judgment.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: 21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Respondent
Party Members: Police Captain II Jason Steel, Police Detective Grace Steel
Reasoning: We have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the search was conducted in accordance to the law.
Detailed explanation:
We believe that, any reasonable individual, after reading the totality of the documents presented by the respondent will come to the conclusion that the individual's search was in accordance with the law, beyond a reasonable doubt.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 19 Mar 2022, 20:59
by Jason Steel
Motion for Discovery
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Discovery
Honorable Judith Mason,
- We the Respondent in the case below are presenting a response to the appellants latest Motion to Compel Discovery.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Appellant/Plaintiff
Party Members: Felix Newnham and Counsel
Exhibit #1: LSPD
Type of Discovery: Digital Evidence
- Written email from the Internal Affairs Command stating that they have no recordings, in any form, bodycamera, dashcamera or otherwise.
All Information from the Discovery The evidence was requested by the appellant.
Pierce Hardy wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022, 20:55
No, we do not. Otherwise it would have been disclosed.
Best,
Commander Hardy
-Sent on my iFruit 13 plus minus 1.
Sincerely,

Jason Steel
Police Captain II, Los Santos Police Department

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 20 Mar 2022, 06:30
by Judith Mason
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 23 Mar 2022, 05:13
by Judith Mason
Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 24 Mar 2022, 18:49
by Dakota Macaw
Motion to Suppress
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion to Suppress
Honorable Justice Mason,
- We the Defense in the case below are requesting that certain evidence be inadmissible in court.
Felix Newnham v. Police Department
Assigned Court Case Number: #21-10-29-AP-013
Requesting Party: Defense
Party Members: Dakota Macaw, Darcy Lafleur, Felix Newnham
Requested Evidence to Suppress: All evidence retrieved from the search of Mr. Newnham and his property.
Detailed explanation:
The respondent has not been able to demonstrate proper probable cause of belief that Mr. Newnham was committing any crime, leaving the search of Mr. Newnham and his property unlawful. Furthermore, they have consistently been unable to provide any footage of the incident, leading to no evidence of a lawful traffic stop in the first place.
Sincerely,

Senior Defense Attorney Dakota Macaw
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 419-3141 —
[email protected]

Re: Felix Newnham v. Police Department | Docket #21-10-29-AP-013
Posted: 26 Mar 2022, 00:17
by Judith Mason

Form 3.0.5 - Issuance of Verdict
San Andreas Judicial Branch
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU" |
ISSUANCE OF VERDICT - #21-10-29-AP-013
IN THE APPEALS COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
Felix Newnham v. Los Santos Police Department
#21-10-29-AP-013
CHARGES BEING DISPUTED:
WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications
WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms / Weapons
VC08 - Failure to Yield (to a TCD)
A verdict was entered in the above case on the 25th day of March, 2022.
- The case of Felix Newnham v. Los Santos Police Department, Docket #21-10-29-AP-013 has hereby been concluded through the respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
[REDACTED]
The Court has made a determination that the above required provisions have been established via the evidence, therefore, the judgment on the charges are as follows:
- On the charge of WM03 - Possession of Weapon Modifications, the appellant Felix Newnham is hereby found guilty.
- On the charge of WF03 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons, the appellant Felix Newnham is hereby found guilty.
- As the charge of VC08 - Failure to Yield (to a TCD) is a citation, the Court will not make a determination as per the State of San Andreas Judicial Branch Policy.
A redacted version of this verdict will be posted to the public docket to ensure all sealed evidence has been kept sealed.

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]
