#24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Yukimura and pertaining parties,

    The Prosecution has no objection to the Defense's recent Motion to Compel discovery. However, we will be requesting to file it under seal.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    Thank you Ms. Johnson for verifying representation. Defense, please file all motions through your representation, unless you are explicitly going with only self-representation in the future. I will be awaiting the relevant rebuttals and any surrebuttals from each party before ruling on the outstanding motions given the timeframes stated above ruling for continuance.

    Respectfully,

    ImageImage
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

OBJECTION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

An Objection was filed in the above case on the 22nd of March, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this objection, and requests the following request(s) be denied;



  • Request(s) being objected to: Defense subpoena requests for arrest reports of Juan Dzefar and Terry Abdul, and statements from Zero Hunter or others involved in the formers' arrests
    • Detailed Reasoning: The subjects of the requested arrest reports have no proven relation to this case. The subpoena requests make references to events that happened more than three months before the incident resulting in this case, with no evidence to tie them together. Additionally, requesting statements from officers involved in these alleged arrests more than a year ago will invariably prejudice the judge against the Prosecution's case due to the potential for the statements' inaccuracy due to the time lapsed since then.


Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

Surrebuttal

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A Surrebuttal was filed in the above case on the 23rd of March, 2025



The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Surrebuttal;

The Prosecution’s rebuttal does not address the core issue - Herrman Wolff was not a firsthand witness to the alleged crime.
The Prosecution attempts to justify the statement’s admission based on Mr. Wolff’s reformation program and mental health clearance, but this does not change the fact that he has no direct knowledge of the events in question.
A statement from an individual with no firsthand observation of the incident is irrelevant to determining the facts of this case.
The Prosecution claims the Defense has not provided evidence of fabrication, yet they also fail to provide evidence that Mr. Wolff’s statement is based on anything other than personal bias and speculation.

The Prosecution’s argument regarding the timing of statements is entirely contradictory:
In their rebuttal defending Herrman Wolff’s year-old statement, they write:
“The timing of the statement should not have any influence on the contents of the statement.”

However, in objecting to the Defense’s subpoena request for arrest reports and officer statements from one year prior, they claim:
“Statements from officers involved in these alleged arrests more than a year ago will invariably prejudice the judge against the Prosecution's case due to the potential for the statements' inaccuracy due to the time lapsed since then.”

The Prosecution cannot argue that time does not impact the credibility of their witness while simultaneously dismissing defense evidence based on time elapsed. If one-year-old statements are unreliable, then Herrman Wolff’s statement is equally unreliable and should be suppressed.
If the Prosecution insists that Wolff’s statement remains relevant despite its age, then they must concede that officer statements from prior related incidents should also be considered.

The requested arrest reports and statements concern individuals tied to prior violent incidents at Weazel News, which establishes the reasonable fear and context behind Mr. Walkner’s actions on May 10, 2024.
The Prosecution dismisses these connections without addressing their importance to the Defense’s self-defense argument.
The requested statements from officers contain objective details that directly support the Defense’s claim that prior incidents made Mr. Walkner fear for his life.

The Prosecution cannot have it both ways - if the timing of Mr. Wolff’s statement does not affect its validity, then the same standard must apply to the officer statements requested in the subpoena.
Herrman Wolff’s statement is irrelevant and prejudicial - it should be suppressed.
The Defense’s subpoena requests are relevant to establishing Mr. Walkner’s reasonable fear for his safety - they should not be denied.

For these reasons, the Defense respectfully requests that the Court grant the Motion to Suppress Exhibit #5 and overrule the Prosecution’s Objection to the Subpoena Requests.

Image
Lead Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 23rd of March, 2025.


The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #6: Weazel News blacklist
    Spoiler
    • Meat Bhack Permanent Chad Rapkov 19-Nov-2023 Attacked a weazel employee
    • Richard Babeage Permanent Herrman Wolff 21-Nov-2023 Kidnapped Ally. KOS
    • Mathew Perez Permanent Grace Speed 1-Dec-2023 Started a shootout at Weazel and threatened employees
    • Alistair Vespucci Permanent Herrman Wolff 10-Dec-2023 Terorist Attack that involved Weazel
    • All Members of the Shadows Permanent Herrman Wolff 10-Dec-2023 Terrorist. Shoot on sight
    • Myles Parker Permanent Herrman Wolff 11-Dec-2023 Terrorist. Shoot on sight
    • Cooper Jackson Permanent Herrman Wolff 11-Dec-2023 Terrorist. Shoot on sight
    • John Chapel Permanent Herrman Wolff 11-Dec-2023 Terrorist. Shoot on sight
    • Joey Casper Permanent Herrman Wolff 11-Dec-2023 Terrorist. Shoot on sight
    • Alex Vespucci Permanent Herrman Wolff 11-Dec-2023 Terrorist. Shoot on sight
    • Tommy Bean Permanent Herrman Wolff 11-Dec-2023 Terrorist. Shoot on sight
    • Anastasia Vespucci Permanent Herrman Wolff 11-Dec-2023 Terrorist. Shoot on sight
    • Bill Tin Permanent Ally Jean 16-Dec-2023 Threatened staff
    • Gertrude Renogrove Permanent Ally Jean 23/12/2023 Assaulted Ally at Church event and called staff "bitches" and talked shit about the event
    • Barthomolomew Nipple Investigation Terry Walkner 25-Dec-2023 breaking and entering Terry's and Shiro's vehicle, stealing items
    • Hector Hannibal Investigation Terry Walkner 25-Dec-2023 breaking and entering Terry's and Hermann's vehicle parked at Weazel
    • Logan Mills Investigation Terry Walkner 25-Dec-2023 breaking and entering Terry's and Hermann's vehicle parked at Weazel
    • Mark Firman Permanent Ally Jean 16/1/2024 Bomb threat against Weazel News
    • Corbin Wilder Permanent Ally Jean 24/1/2024 Assault of a Weazel Employee
    • Terry Abdul Warning Chad Rapkov 2/1/2024 Picking cars in the back of weazel
    • Juan Dzefar Permanent Ally Jean 21/2/2024 Held 5 Weazel Employees at gunpoint
    • Tom Mathers Permanent Ally Jean 5/3/2024 Stabbed a Weazel Employee
    • Luther Lupine Permanent Parker Harrison 3/8/2024 Attacked a Weazel truck because we would not give him a finder's fee for reporting a news story. He was arrested.
    • David Vespucci (Coast) Permanent Ally Jean 27/3/2024 Kidnapped Ally.
    • Jack Samberg Permanent Parker Harrison 4/6/2024 Attempted to break into Weazel parking lot and then attacked employees with a knife
    • Pacconi Attrazione Permanent Terry Walkner 22/4/2024 extremely vulgar towards multiple weazel employees, started smashing weazel vehicles
    • Derick Gee Permanent Dan Endo 5/2/2024 picking cars in the back of weazel
    • Omar Miscudi Investigation Terry Walkner 5/10/2024 Picklocking cars in Weazel parking, pulled gun on employees in attempt to rob.
    • Luke Lennon Permanent Don Mozzarella 12/5/2024 Constant, consistent, and long-lasting harrassment of Weazel employees consisting of death threats and general negative threatening remarks towards employees and on-site customers.
    • Charlie Bukx Permanent Samuele Colonna 15/5/2024 Threatened to murder weazel employee for no apparent reason. He then started vandalising a weazel Rhinehart and fled when confronted.


Image
Lead Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    This is a notice to the courts that I, the presiding judge for this case, will no longer be accepting statements from either party. Thank you to all parties for their work and patience. The case is now pending my court decision/verdict and will proceed once it has been finalized. Expect to see a response from the courts in the next 7 days.

    Respectfully,

    ImageImage
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    I have been correctly informed by prosecution that I did not allow the traditional 72 hours to respond to the defense's motion for discovery. As such I will only be allowing motions and rebuttals with regards to the defense's motion for discovery while I draft rulings on the rest of the filings from both sides. Prosecution will have another 24 hours, and then the usual 72 to respond will be allotted for the usual responses from either side.

    Respectfully,

    ImageImage
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION TO SUPPRESS


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A Motion to Suppress was filed in the above case on the 27th of March, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests to following be suppressed from evidence;


  • Exhibit #6: Weazel News blacklist
    Requested Evidence to Suppress:
    Entire exhibit
    • Detailed Reasoning: Lack of foundation; relevance; more prejudicial than probative. There is no providence or proof of origin for this exhibit, which consists solely of some names and dates bundled together on a list, suspiciously called "Weazel News blacklist". As the exhibit is a simple document without any identifying components such as official company letterhead or document description, neither the Prosecution nor the court can trust the evidence's authenticity, inherently prejudicing the judge. Furthermore, the names on this alleged "blacklist" has no proven relevance to this case, as argued by the Prosecution in response to the Defense's subpoena requests.



Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    We thank you all parties for their patience. However, given the need for multiple decisions, they are all being finalized as various clerks and assistants are working hard on getting the relevant requested precedence on my desk. I expect the rulings to finalized within 72 hours.

    Respectfully,

    ImageImage
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 4th of April, 2025.


The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #7: Witness Statement, LSPD Public Relations Specialist Ally Jean
    Spoiler
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Case Number: #24-CM-0085
      Incident Date: 10/MAY/2024 14:57
    Witness Information
    • Name: Ally Jean
      Phone Number: 216-3675
      Occupation: Public Relations Specialist, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • I was an employee at Weazel News for an amazing 15 months before departing from the organization as Creative Director November 1st 2024 to pursue my career at the LSPD. Weazel News, due to it's popularity and central location, was often the target of crime ranging from staff cars being broken into in our parking lot, to staff harassment, and in extreme cases, assault of staff. The Weazel Blacklist ((at the time I was in the faction, a google document)) functions as a safety measure for staff, to ensure that as we accepted news requests from the people of this great state, our employees could remain safe. I myself have made entries to this blacklist during my time at Weazel for reasons ranging from my own kidnapping(s), to various assaults or harassment from members of the public. Members were always free to dispute this Blacklist via the Weazel News website via the following link https://www.weazelnewsnetwork.com/home/appeals

      The blacklist, along with specific entries (with date and time), could easily be verified by any active Weazel employee currently employed at Weazel News.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Ally Jean, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Image
      Ally Jean

      Date: 02/April/2025

    Image




Image
Lead Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

Rebuttal


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A Rebuttal was filed in the above case on the 5th of April, 2025




The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Rebuttal;

Firstly, the Prosecution's motion to suppress Exhibit #6 on the basis of "lack of foundation" is now resolved. Exhibit #7 confirms the blacklist was a legitimate internal document, maintained by Weazel News staff as a safety measure. The statement affirms that entries were made by staff, including Ally Jean herself, and that current employees can verify the list's authenticity. Therefore, the foundation has been established.

Secondly, the Prosecution argues that Exhibit #6 lacks relevance. However, the Defense asserts that the blacklist is directly relevant to the case. It demonstrates that Mr. Walkner held a management position within Weazel News with authority over employee safety protocols, and it establishes context regarding individuals he flagged for misconduct. This is especially appropriate when evaluating motive, bias, or retaliation - factors crucial to understanding the circumstances surrounding the allegations.

Lastly, the claim that the blacklist is "more prejudicial than probative" is unfounded. The entries are specific, date-stamped, and documented in a factual, non-exaggerated manner. The document does not sensationalize or speculate; instead, it details internal incidents based on employee experiences. The evidentiary value far outweighs any risk of undue prejudice.

For these reasons, the Defense respectfully requests that Exhibit #6 be admitted into evidence.

Image
Lead Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A decision was reached in the above case on the 6th day of April, 2025.


With regards to the motion of discovery of Herrman Wolff's statement and the relevant motion to suppress it, the court will be denying the defense's request to suppress the statement in full. The prosecution has correctly pointed out that impeaching a witness occurs at trial, so regardless of the witness's character, the statement will be allowed. Mr. Wolff has never been found guilty of the crimes of GF24 - Perjury or GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer, so the Court will not be pre-emptively impeaching the witness. Furthermore, we have a precedent that allows witness statements as long as both sides have ample time to review the statement, as shown previously in #24-AP-0001.

With regard to the defense's request to compel discovery of the case file, the prosecution has agreed to this and they also believe that the case file should be kept under seal. The court will be granting both requests, as it is reasonable to believe that it could contain sensitive enough data to warrant being kept under seal. As such, the court will be reviewing the evidence under seal, and working with both parties on handling this.

With regards to the first subpoena request and its relevant objections, the court will be treating this as another motion to compel discovery, as this is something the prosecution can provide to the docket as Law Enforcement is not a third party to this case. However, we will be only granting the request for the arrest report of Mr. Juan Dzefar for the requested date if it exists. Requesting any witness statements will be denied as overly broad and/or burdensome.

With regards to the second subpoena request and its relevant objections, the court will be making the same ruling as above, and will be granting a motion to compel discovery only for the arrest report of Mr. Terry Abdul on the requested date.

With regards to the motion for discovery and the prosecution's motion to suppress it, the court will be siding with the prosecution and suppressing it in whole. Regardless of whether or not it is relevant, the prosecution is completely correct that it lacks the relevant foundation to confirm if that is truly the blacklist, or what date was it possibly an accurate representation of the blacklist. As such it will be suppressed in its current format, however, the court sees its relevance to the case. Defense is heavily encouraged to obtain and submit the blacklist in an official format to the docket.

Respectfully,

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 7th of April, 2025.


The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;






Image
Lead Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Yukimura,

    Could Your Honor please clarify if there is an intention to file the signed subpoenas for the requested arrest reports, or if the court decision in effect denies the requests but places an order for discovery on them instead?

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    For prosecution's clarity,
    Sayaka Yukimura wrote: 06 Apr 2025, 20:44 With regards to the first subpoena request and its relevant objections, the court will be treating this as another motion to compel discovery, as this is something the prosecution can provide to the docket as Law Enforcement is not a third party to this case.
    Sayaka Yukimura wrote: 06 Apr 2025, 20:44 With regards to the second subpoena request and its relevant objections, the court will be making the same ruling as above, and will be granting a motion to compel discovery only for the arrest report of Mr. Terry Abdul on the requested date.
    means the court is denying the request for a subpoena but not requiring defense to re-submit as an order to compel discovery, as that would be a waste of everyone's time. Furthermore, these requests are granted and prosecution is ordered to provide the requested evidence to the docket.

    Respectfully,

    ImageImage
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 15th of April, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #6: Arrest report - Terry Abdul, 01/FEB/2025
    Image
    Image

    Los Santos Police Department

    ARREST REPORT
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"


    MUGSHOT
    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • Full Name: Terry Abdul
        Phone Number: 2992318
        Licenses Suspended: No
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Cadet Fitz Keegan
        Charges:
        • GF15 - Burglary
        • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
        • DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed
        • WF01 - Assault with a Deadly Weapon
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 01/FEB/2024

        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • On the above date, Officer Keegan was dispatched to a 911 call in regard to a shooting that occurred at Weazel News HQ. On arrival, Officer Keegan was called over to the east side of the building by a Weazel News employee to find an injured man laying near the building. BLS was given by Officer Keegan. The man was shot twice in his leg. Upon further investigation, the Weazel News employees stated that the man injured, Terry Abdul, was seen burglarizing multiple vehicles in the gated area of Weazel News. Abdul also confessed to this. One Weazel News employee chased Abdul following his burglarizing attempts and attempted to make a citizens arrest with a licensed Heavy Revolver MkII. Abdul decided to fire twice at the Weazel News Employee striking him on both attempts. The employee shot back at Abdul twice injuring him. I do not believe it was Abdul intention to murder the employee hence WF01 charge. Abdul was found with a unlicensed .50 Pistol, Lockpicks, and Processed Marijuana on his person and vehicle after being searched. The above charges reflect this narrative.
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.

        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: 1x Pistol .50
          Exhibit B: 1x Marijuana
          Exhibit C: 2x Lockpicks
          Exhibit D: 1x Gloves


          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: 1x Water
          Exhibit B: 1x Hat
          Exhibit C: 2x GPS
          Exhibit D: 1x Radio

          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)
          Image
    Image
  • Exhibit #7: Arrest report - Juan Dzefar, 21/FEB/2025
    Image
    Image

    Los Santos Police Department

    ARREST REPORT
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

    MUGSHOT
    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • Full Name: Juan Dzefar
        Phone Number: 5843889
        Licenses Suspended: No
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Officer III Heath Tegans
        • Police Officer III Oli Green
        • Chief of Police Elena Flores
        • Police Cadet Ashley Quinn
        Charges:
        • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
        • GF03 - Armed Robbery
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 21/FEB/2024

        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • A 911 call regarding individuals holding up weazel employees was made and our units responded. At the scene one suspect was found injured via Weazel employees personal firearms. He was found with a pistol 50 and after reviewing CCTV and taking statements we concluded he and one other attempted to rob them for firearms. the other suspect escaped and this suspect was taken to DOC.
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.

        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Pistol .50, Serial Number 1707294640780


          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Legal Possessions (stored in DOC)

          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)
          Image
    Image
  • Exhibit #8: LSPD Robbery-Homicide Unit case file - Case file #170724
    Filed under seal

Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A Motion to Compel Discovery was filed in the above case on the 20th of April, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Compel Discovery, and requests as follows;


  • Requested Discovery: Defense exhibit "Full Official Weazel blacklist" source of origin; chain of custody
    • Detailed Reasoning: The Prosecution is asking the Defense be ordered to provide the source of origin and chain of custody of the name exhibit. Statements have been made that cause us to believe this list is a private and unofficial copy, with the potential to have been altered. This is further supported by the exhibit itself, which is titled "weazel blacklist backup 5-26-24". The Defense has provided no source of origin for this copy or proof of maintaining a proper chain of custody, despite labelling it as "official". The Prosecution, with this motion, asks the court to compel the Defense to provide the source of its discovery and prove tthat he chain of custody has remained intact.


Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

  • Parties,

    With an interest in impartiality and expediting the case forward, and given precedent with similar requests for gang affiliation, the court itself has looked into the prosecution's request to verify authenticity. The court has confirmed with the CEO of Weazel News, Marco Davis, that exhibit 8 provided by the defense is an accurate and authentic copy of the blacklist as of the date given, the 26th of May 2024. As such, the court will be accepting the blacklist provided by the defense into evidence.

    Respectfully,

    ImageImage
    Superior Court Judge
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"



NOTICE OF SCHEDULING


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 21st of April, 2025.


All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Yukimura and pertaining parties,

    The Prosecution has filed for its availability.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF TRIAL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#24-CM-0085

A trial date was set on the above case on 23rd of April, 2025.


In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 07:00 PM on 27th of April, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Sayaka Yukimura and pertaining parties,

    The Defense respectfully requests a rescheduling of the trial, as the defendant has been unable to provide his ability.

    Respectfully,

    Image
    Lead Defense Attorney
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    (909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"



NOTICE OF SCHEDULING


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#25-CM-0085

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 9th of May, 2025.


All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Terence Williams »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch

Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  • Honorable Judge Yukimura and pertaining parties,

    The Prosecution has filed for its availability.

    Regards,
    Image
    Terence Williams
    Attorney General
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3577
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #24-CM-0085 State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF TRIAL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Terry Walkner
#25-CM-0085

A trial date was set on the above case on 30th of May, 2025.


In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 07:00 PM on 8th of June, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Formal Criminal Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests