Eclipse Government

---

• Honorable Daniels,
  
  The Prosecution notes that the decision as made by yourself was not aimed at a particular Motion as made very clearly by the formatting of the court decision, but a comment in general. As such, the argument as made by the Defense does not uphold.

---

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

• Honorable Daniels,
  
  The Prosecution notes that the decision as made by yourself was not aimed at a particular Motion as made very clearly by the formatting of the court decision, but a comment in general. As such, the argument as made by the Defense does not uphold.

---

Respectfully,

Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]

---

---

I will be denying the Motion to Suppress filed by the defense on December 12th, 2022. The reason behind the original suppression of this footage was due to the footage not being available for analysis. Now that to footage is available to the court, the suppression of that evidence is no longer valid and the footage will be admissible at trial.

Furthermore the prosecution is correct in saying that the decision was not related to a particular motion but to any additional body camera evidence they wish to provide. At this time I ask no further motions be filed and discovery is hereby closed.



Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

---

• Counselors,
  
  At this time I move to hear this case in my courtroom. Please use the following scheduling tool to file your availability for trial.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Chief Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

---

• Counselors,
  
  Thank you for your swift action making your availability. This trial is now being scheduled for Friday, December 16th, 2022 at 9:00PM UTC. Please be present no later than 15 minutes prior for pretrial.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Chief Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 402-9713 — [email protected]

---

---

The court has reviewed all the evidence presented, the arguments made by both parties, and have come to a clear and concise decision. The evidence in the case has shows that the defendant while in the observatory tunnel moved his vehicle as far as he could to the side of the tunnel and parked. This was done in an attempt to yield to law enforcement officers engaged in a pursuit and not impede their travel through the tunnel.

Furthermore, the court agrees with the defense that the right turn from Sinner Street onto Vespucci Boulevard is not illegal as the road markings shown in the satellite images clearly display a white dotted line to guide drivers who are making the right hand turn. However, the court agrees with the prosecution that the defendant was engaging in activities which distracts the driver from driving safely. This was done through the activity of using his cellular device.

To use a cellular device the defendant had to use one of his hands to hold the phone instead of both being placed on the steering wheel and divide his attention from the road to his phone. These two aspects combined lead the court the the decision that the defendant was distracted when engaging in these activities.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of VM04 - Disruptive Impeding or Blocking Travel, I find the defendant, Vince Williams, not guilty.
• On the count of VM05 - Drunk, Impaired, or Distracted Driving, I find the defendant, Vince Williams, guilty.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 402-9713 — [email protected]