#26-CM-0001 State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey

[Piper Johnson]

Defendant Name: Cody Mackey
Defendant Phone: 249-8252
(( Defendant Discord: lauris6184))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT+2))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 12/JAN/2025 20:32
Charge(s):

• NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
• SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
• GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
• AM04 - Disrupting Airport/Aircraft Operations
• SF07 - Bank Robbery
• VF01 - Evading an Officer

Narrative:
I believe our client was wrongfully charged.

---

I, Piper Johnson, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 20th day of January, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#25-BT-0046

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Adithya Ramesh]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#25-BT-0046

A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 17 MAY, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Requested Venue: Formal Trial
  • Detailed Explanation:
    
    Given the intricacy of the case, from bank robbery in concert with taking a hostage, systemic evasiveness through LSIA airspace, to the number of officers and agencies present, formal trial is better suited. It provides for in-depth presentation of evidence, valid legal argument on group liability and airport disruption under AM04, and allows the issue to be preserved on public record. Elevation to full trial also offers the chance to settle any precedent-establishing legal issues that could come up.

Junior Prosecutor
San Andreas Judicial Branch
514-3247 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  The court has noted the prosecution's intent to set precedent with the case. Can the defense provide their thoughts on the matter, so that the court can make a ruling? Given that a public defender filed the case submission, the court finds it a safe assumption that the defendant has proper representation and can weigh in on the motion to change venue.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Piper Johnson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Sayaka Yukimura and pertaining parties,
  
  The defense confirms that the defendant will be properly represented. We have no objections to the prosecution's motion for a change of venue.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Lead Defense Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 480-1442 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey

A decision was reached in the above case on the 15th day of June, 2025.

The court will be granting the prosecutions request to hear this as a Formal Criminal Trial. We are rescinding the order for discovery due to the transition of this case from bench trial to formal criminal trial. As such both parties will be notified when they are ordered to provide any evidence to the court via a new Order for Discovery and set timeline for progress. The court thanks all parties for their patience in this matter.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Theodore J Harding]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#26-CM-0001

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on the 14th day of January, 2026.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey is hereby activated by this Court under #26-CM-0001 as a Formal Criminal Trial.

Both the State and Defendant in this case are still awaiting adequate representation. At this time the court will delay the Order for Discovery until adequate representation has been assigned for the Defendant and a State Prosecutor has been assigned to the case and both parties inform the court they are ready to proceed.

In accordance with guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas, this case shall require an in-person trial. Once all pretrial matters have been resolved, a Notice of Scheduling will be issued to arrange an appropriate time for trial.

Respectfully,

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 227-6646 — [email protected]

[Luna McMillan]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2026.

I, Luna McMillan, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant(s), Name in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.



Luna McMillan
Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
463-9315 — [email protected][/list]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#26-BT-0001

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 25th day of January, 2026.

I, Rowin Lawson, a Prosecutor of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Theodore J Harding]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#26-CM-0001

A court order was entered in the above case on 31st day of January, 2026.

The case of #26-CM-0001, State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.

So ordered,

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 227-6646 — [email protected]

[Luna McMillan]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
26-CM-0001 State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Honorable Judge J. Hardling and parties,
  
  You have given prosecution 7 days to file their discovery, we have seen no discovery nor any means to ask for a continuance we ask the court to take this into account. We ask that the charges are dropped against my client and a dismissal is given as the prosecution had more than enough time to send a motion for continuance and also to follow the discovery phase, we also ask that the dismissal is one that this case cannot be brought back up in court. This case has gone on for long enough and is starting to break my clients 6th amendment right for a fair and speedy trial. I will quote the honorable judge now "A court order was entered in the above case on 31st day of January, 2026." this shows that it has been over 30 days without contact from the prosecution. We are asking for the courts to rule and put an end to this now.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Public Defense Attorney
  Luna McMillan
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  463-9315 — [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#25-BT-0046

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 13 MAY, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1:Arrest Report - Cody Mackey, 12/JAN/2025

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  MUGSHOT

  • SUSPECT DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Cody Mackey
      Phone Number: 2498252
      Licenses Suspended: Yes
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Officer III Percy Heines
      • Police Captain I Jason Steel
      • Police Captain I Jonathan Willowick
      • Police Lieutenant I Alex Sorvanis
      • Police Detective I George Vern
      • Police Officer III Alaska Sorvanis
      • Police Officer III Laurant Conrad
      • Police Cadet Alfie Bower
      • Police Officer II Alonzo Wallace
      Charges:
      • NM03 - Unlawful Assembly
      • VF01 - Evading an Officer
      • SF07 - Bank Robbery
      • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      • SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
      • AM04 - Disrupting Airport/Aircraft Operations
    INCIDENT NARRATIVE
    • Incident Date: 12/JAN/2025
      
      Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
      • Units responded to a bank robbery (SF07 - Bank Robbery) wherein 8 individuals were holding a hostage (SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage, NM03 - Unlawful Assembly) in return for safe passage. A deal was brokered in which the hostage (and hostage-taker) would be surrendered, and in return the rest would go free. Cody Mackey was one such person who ran free, and began evading (VF01 - Evading an Officer) in a jugular. The jugular made its way to the sandy area west of the airport, and all occupants fled into the ocean. Mr. Mackey swam around for a bit, then made his way into LSIA (AM04 - Disrupting Airport/Aircraft Operations), where he ran around on the tarmac before an associate picked him up. They continued fleeing until they ran into a unit on Senora Freeway and injured themselves. On his person, a mask was recovered (GM19 - Face Concealment (b)).
    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
      Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
      
      Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
      • Illegal Possessions:
        
        
        Legal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Clothing
        Exhibit B: GPS
        Exhibit C: Radio
        
        
        Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

        

  

• Exhibit #2:Witness Statement - Detective George Vern

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 12/JAN/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: George Vern
    Date of Birth: 22/JUL/2025
    Phone Number: ###-####
    Occupation: Detective I, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • Detective I Grace Steel announced on the radio that a bank robbery was taking place at Life Invader.
    Detective Vern and Captain Steel, at the time on a Supervisor Guided Patrol and acting Patrol Supervisors, responded to the call.
    Detective Vern spent the time there coordinating with units as to who would pursue what vehicle.
    Upon the development of the situation and once the hostage was released, Detective Vern and Captain Steel remained on scene to provide first aid to the hostage and to coordinate cleanup, evidence gathering and the pursuits that were taking place.
    Following that, they responded to the pursuit of the two individuals that was entering Los Santos Freeway.
    They witnessed the two suspects enter the incorrect offramp to the casino, at which point they collided with a unit and became injured.
    Detective Vern arranged their treatment, transportation and processing to DOC by assigning units to them.
    Current evidence suggested that the individuals fleeing were initially in a Jugular that ended up by LSIA, and then entered LSIA on the active taxiway and runway, disrupting airport operations.
    They were then charged accordingly and were taken to DOC.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, George Vern, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    George Vern
    Detective I
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 19/JAN/2025

  

• Exhibit #3:Bodycam Footage - Detective George Vern

  * Attaches dashcam and bodycam footage from - Detective I George Vern - LSPD
  
  * The Bodycam footage would show Detective Vern around the bank, coordinating units. It would then show the Detective entering a Scout and pursuing the vehicle in question around the Mirror Park Gas Station. The pursuit would go on for approximately 1 minute until the motorcycle crashed into a responding unit. Finally, another Officer's voice would be heard saying that they should be charged with AM04 - Disrupting Airport/Aircraft Operations due to the fact that they were on the active runway and taxiway during the pursuit.
  
  

• Exhibit #4:Witness Statement - Officer Percy Henes

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 12/JAN/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Percy Henes
    Date of Birth: 05/SEP/1999
    Phone Number: I'd prefer not to say
    Occupation: Police Officer III, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • While the overall narrative is present in my arrest report, allow me to provide my personal account;
    
    I arrived on scene to a bank robbery call at life invader bank wherein it was found numerous (the exact number escapes me but I'd estimate at least 8) individuals were inside the bank, alongside 1 individual (later identified as Ethan Blackwood) armed with a sawed-off shotgun, and a hostage. All individuals inside were complicit in the robbery and made no effort to remove themselves other than the hostage.
    
    Mr. Mackey specifically stepped forward to negotiate with Lt. Sorvanis, and a deal was eventually brokered in which the parties would be allowed to exit to their vehicles (to my recollection, a blue novak, a black jugular, at the very least), and in return the hostage-taker would surrender himself and the hostage to police. During this time, we organized into several tactical channels based on vehicles, with air support above, as well as a high speed intercept unit. Mr. Mackey got into the jugular, which began evading after exiting the bank.
    
    I assisted in the arrest of Mr. Blackwood (the hostage taker) and the hostage, then began pursuing the robbers. My specific tactical channel began pursuit of the jugular. It evaded until making its way to Vespucci beach where it came to a stop near the sandy area to the west of the airport, at which point all occupants fled from the vehicle into the ocean. I volunteered to grab a police boat, while air kept eyes on the other suspects. I was assigned a particular suspect, whom I followed for a lengthy swim until he fled into the airport. I gave chase but ultimately returned to the boat to prevent it floating away. The suspect I was chasing, who I am absolutely certain was not Mr. Mackey, escaped into the airport.
    
    However, air was tracking Mr. Mackey and a cohort, as well as officers in hot pursuit, meaning there was absolutely no time at which point Mr. Mackey was not within visual contact of officers since leaving the bank. Mr. Mackey fled into the airport until a cohort of his picked him up inside the airport on a motorbike of some kind and began evading. This second pursuit took units from the airport to Los Santos freeway behind Diamond Casino, where the two suspects (one of which was Mr. Mackey) accidentally collided with either the barrier wall of the nearby exit ramp, or a unit. Either way, both occupants of the vehicle were injured upon collision. I arrived on scene shortly thereafter and was assigned Mr. Mackey to be taken to DOC.
    
    Although my arrest report lists all the charges and their justifications, I will explain further;
    
    • Unlawful assembly for gathering to rob the bank, as all inside the bank were associated and even were that not the case, they all conspired to rob the bank willfully.
    • Evading an officer for getting into the jugular and willfully fleeing the scene when the opportunity to surrender immediately was without a doubt offered
    • Bank robbery for robbing Life Invader bank along with his associates
    • Face Concealment (b) for wearing a mask during the commission of his crimes
    • False imprisonment of a hostage for not only using a hostage during the robbery, but doing so with the explicit reasoning of avoiding officers breaching the building with prejudice and arresting all the individuals, which is easily apparent by virtue of 7 of the robbers being unarmed.
    • Disrupting airport/aircraft operations by virtue of trespassing into LSIA, driving on the runway, and generally disrupting the airport's operations through their unwelcome presence, as well as necessarily inviting the intervention of LSPD to ascertain them.
      
      Bodycam footage of the event has been archived.
      
      ((
      Proof of RP

      
      ))

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Percy Heines, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    Sincerely,
    
    Police Officer III Percy Heines
    Los Santos Police Department
    Date: 19/JAN/2025

  

• Exhibit #5:Witness Statement - Lieutenant Alex Sorvanis

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 12/JAN/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Alex Sorvanis
    Date of Birth: 07/JAN/2001
    Phone Number: ###-####
    Occupation: Police Lieutenant, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • There was a bank robbery with a hostage, after negotiations took place, the suspect started evading on a jugular when all of the occupants jumped in the water and started to evade in the water, Cody made it towards LSIA where his friend came and picked him up on a BF400 while inside the airport affecting its operations, they evaded and at some point they went to the incorrect lane of travel and hit 2 of our units and got injured. They both got treated and were transported to DOC.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Alex Sorvanis, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Alex Sorvanis
    Police Lieutenant I
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 20/JAN/2025

  

• Exhibit #6:Witness statement - Officer Alaska Sorvanis

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 12/JAN/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Alaska Sorvanis
    Date of Birth: 12/DEC/2000
    Phone Number: 252-5903
    Occupation: Police Officer, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • I will attempt to recall these events to the best of my ability;
    
    Cody was at a bank robbery with a hostage, after negotiations took place the suspect hopped into a black jugular and started to evade towards the water, he jumped in the water and started to swim with units behind him in the water. Cody reached LSIA were a BF400 with his friend was waiting inside the airport at the airstrip and got picked up. Suspects evaded towards the casino area where they took the incorrect off ramp and 2 of our units were coming down so it resulted in a collision with the suspects. They got treated and transported to DOC.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Alaska Sorvanis, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Alaska Sorvanis
    Police Officer III
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 01/JAN/2000

  

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Luna McMillan]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION TO SUPPRESS

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#26-CM-0001

A Motion to Suppress was filed in the above case on the 9th day of March, 2026.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests the following be stricken from the record;

• Exhibit: All exhibits
  Objection: Relevance
  Reasoning: The evidence provided above does not have the correct case on it nor does it have nor the correct date of posting. Secondly this evidence was given 30 days late meaning it should be void

Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
4639315 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  Given the concerns raised by the defense, I would like to take the opportunity to both clarify the current situation and educate the defense on this case. Firstly, I would like to apologize to the courts and the defense in regard to the delay in submission of the discovery. Due to my current workload of (29) active cases. It appears that this discovery slipped past without my notice. I Would like to apologize to the courts again for this oversight.
  
  In order to address the "Motion to Suppress" presented by the defense, I would advise the opposing counsel to educate themselves on the history of this case. The discovery submitted does contain evidence that is in fact related to the current case. The discovery was presenting with the previous date and case number in an attempt to provide transparency that the delay was due to oversight. The Prosecution will gladly reupload the discovery with the updated case number if that would provide clarity for Attorney McMillan.
  
  The prosecution would urge the court to not suppress the discovery or dismiss this case due to oversight. This case has been on hold for over a year, The discovery had already been prepared, and its delayed submission was simply due to oversite. No additional evidence has been collected; The Prosecution has gained no edge by the delay of this case. The prosecution is not attempting to be dismissive of the deadlines presented to the court, or are we attempting to behave as if the deadlines should not apply due to staffing. That being said, The Prosecution would urge the Court to allow an exception to be made due to the circumstances surrounding this case.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Rowin Lawson
  Deputy Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  451-9939 - [email protected]

[Luna McMillan]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
26-CM-0001
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Honorable Judge and parties,
  
  I am also the only defense attorney from defenses side so lets not play the amount of workload please we are both in the same both but my motion for this case to be dismissed is still the same as the prosecution knew the deadline and therefor did not send the discovery. This is a big breach of the 6th amendment and should no longer continue.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Public Defense Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  4639315 - [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#26-BT-0001

A decision was reached in the above case on the 19th day of March, 2026.

The Court thanks everyone for their patience on this filing. We apologize for the delay in response from the State Judiciary. This case has now been reassigned to myself. From now on, I will take on the role of the presiding judge.

Alongside of a reassignment, I will be ruling on the previous motion: The Motion to Suppress. The court understands the position of the defense in that time spent waiting for discovery should be considered when looking at the rights of a defendant to a speedy trial. The court also sympathizes with the position of the prosecution, and the workload they are currently under as a near solo individual in their division.

Given the probable cause for the charges has been provided to the courts prior to action being taken, we will be moving forward. Please note that this takes into consideration the specific circumstance of the Prosecution division - one to two individuals, 30+ cases, and new leadership. However the court wants to make it known that no further delays will be entertained.

Defense, you now have 7 days to present your discovery or any motions you would like to have the court consider during the motions hearing.

So Ordered,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#26-CM-0001

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 29th day of March, 2026.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a Motions Hearing on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time for the Motions Hearing take place and post a Notice of Motions Hearing informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

Respectfully,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

[Luna McMillan]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#26-CM-0001

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 29th day of March, 2026.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: I will be on Leave of Absence at the times of this scheduling.

Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
4639315 - [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Cody Mackey
#26-BT-0001

A decision was reached in the above case on the 19th day of April, 2026.

Defense, you have no recorded or accepted LOA for the dates noted in the scheduling notice for May. Please file your availability accordingly either here or here. Motion for Continuance is denied.

Prosecution thank you for filing your availability. We will be looking to schedule as soon as we hear back from defense.

So Ordered,


Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The court will be looking to our internal schedule for the month of May to determine the best times. That being said, the Court notes the accepted leave of absence from the Chief Public Defender Allgood, from the 1st of May until the 11th of May.
  
  We will be looking to schedule the Motions Hearing once Chief Public Defender Allgood returns.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Chief Justice
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 - [email protected]