#25-BT-0037 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

[David Vespucci]

Defendant Name: David Vespucci
Defendant Phone: 5931338
(( Defendant Discord: .kujima ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 19th December 2024 01:00
Charge(s):

• Any charges placed by either Lance Sage or Lana Sage/Valor/Murphy/Hoe

Narrative:
I was unlawfully detained then unlawfully arrested, had a chat where Lance Sage was very upset and where Lana Valor was surprised I didn't know her last name even though she is actually a hoe.

Secondly, While under "oath" I would like to mention that Lana Valor basically sucked dick to get her charges removed and now is a police officer, how fun.

This is all pertinent to my defense to understand the mindset of the officers involved.

---

I, David Vespucci, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

A decision was reached in the above case on the 21th day of December, 2024.

The court has received the case and noted the initial posting of the defendant.

During our review, the court noticed the narrative of the defendant has multiple speculative arguments that border on defamation. While this is not a civil court, it is a criminal court that considers the facts of the case. The court has determined that the statement by the defendant has breached the rules of evidence and request that the defendant remove any inflammatory statements made against any individuals. We request that the defendant speak to a defense attorney or opt to stick to the facts of the case.

It is with the above consideration that I find the defendant guilty of GM-22 Contempt of Court for the statements made. It is one thing to disagree with your arrest and a completely different thing to use the docket as a means to spread gossip.

So Ordered,

Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[David Vespucci]

Black Kids with Cancer & Aids Charitable Organization Court Case 21/DEC/2024

• Honorable Hope Kant,
  
  As you are clearly a newish judge you must not understand. I ask the court for almost a favor that the charge of GM-22 Contempt of Court is added onto the disputed charges for this trial.
  
  If this is not possible I will still be in my rights to fight it separately within 7 days so I respectfully ask that they be merged. If that is the case I request that Hope Kant is not the judge on this case, no matter the delays it causes.
  
  Hope Kant has prosecuted me in past numerous times and has basically just shown her bias towards me. She even once had a restraining order out of me.
  
  The statements were clearly to understand from a legal perspective the officers authority and mindset during the situation. I included extra context where I could which is perfectly fine due to there was no disrespect.

---

• With deep appreciation,
  
  
  Founder, Owner (not of the kids)
  Reformed Convict
  ☏ 593-1338
  Small Black Kids.. Big Hearts.. We fight for both!

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Defendant,
  
  Your request for a judge other than myself has been noted by the court. As for your contempt of court charge, that will have to be taken up in the Court of Appeals. The court considers Contempt of Court charges to be official rulings made by judges on the docket. Feel free to submit you appeal.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Superior Court Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0037

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0037

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 26th of May, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest Report - David Vespucci, 19/DEC/2024

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  MUGSHOT

  • SUSPECT DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: David Vespucci
      Phone Number: 5931338
      Licenses Suspended: Yes
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Detective III Lance Sage
      • Police Cadet Lana Sage
      • Police Detective I George Vern
      • Police Captain I Jason Steel
      Charges:
      • VF01 - Evading an Officer
      • VF02 - Felony Hit and Run of a Gov. Employee
      • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      • GF15 - Burglary
      • GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer
      • GF16 - Tampering with Evidence
    INCIDENT NARRATIVE
    • Incident Date: 19/DEC/2024
      
      Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
      • While on patrol near City Hall, I saw an individual trying to lockpick a motorcycle. I got out of my vehicle to detain him, but he jumped into a gray Terminus, ran me over, and fled the scene. Units responded quickly, but we lost sight of the vehicle around Bay City Ave
        
        A few minutes later, another unit spotted David Vespucci in Chumash, wearing the same clothes and fitting the earlier description. He was detained, but the Terminus was missing. When questioned, Vespucci denied owning the car, claiming he had sold it two weeks ago. Shortly after, we located the same Terminus nearby. It was confirmed to be the vehicle that struck me and was still registered to Vespucci.
    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
      Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
      
      Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
      • Illegal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Face Bandana
        Exhibit B: Lockpick
        
        
        Legal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Gloves
        Exhibit B: Radio
        Exhibit C: GPS
        Exhibit D: Knife
        
        
        Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

        

  

• Exhibit #2: Vehicle and Impound Details - 19/DEC/2024

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department IMPOUND REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  ---

  • VEHICLE DETAILS
    • Vehicle Owner: David Vespucci
      Phone Number: 5931338
      License Plate: UXGPC9TM
      Vehicle Identification Number (VIN): 6SRERCYAHJJZ1A000
      Vehicle Model: Terminus
      Vehicle Color: Grey and black
      Miscelleanous Details:
    
    IMPOUND DETAILS
    • Date and Time: 19/DEC/2024 01:40
      Location: the beach by great ocean highway
      Brief Statement of Impounding Reason: He hit a officer and then evaded and then told us that he didn't own the car that he hit an officer
      Officers Involved: Police Detective III Lance Sage, Police Cadet Lana Sage, Police Detective I George Vern, Police Captain I Jason Steel, Police Detective I Grace Steel, Police Officer I Elijah Allen
      Documented Evidence:

  
  

  ---

  

• Exhibit #3: Witness Statment - Police Detective Lance Sage

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 19/12/2024 UTC

  Witness Information

  • Name: Lance Sage
    Date of Birth: N/A
    Phone Number: N/A
    Occupation: Polie Detective III, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • While on patrol near City Hall, I saw an individual wearing a buffer jacket, White undershirt and a tie that white hair and a man bun, trying to lockpick a motorcycle. I got out of my vehicle to detain him, but he jumped into a gray Terminus that is owned by David Vespucci, ran me over, and fled the scene. Units responded quickly, but we lost sight of the vehicle around Bay City Ave
    
    A few minutes later, another unit spotted David Vespucci in Chumash, wearing the same clothes and has the same face tattoo and fitting the earlier description of the the suspect from City hall. He was detained, but the Terminus was missing. When questioned, Vespucci denied owning the car, claiming he had sold it two weeks ago. Shortly after, we located the same Terminus nearby not even 200 meters away from where we found him when he started running on foot. It was confirmed to be the same vehicle that struck me and was still registered to David Vespucci. Additionally, you can hear him talk when I approached him outside Cityhall.
    
    
    David Vespucci was wearing a Buffer jacket, White undershirt with a tie, suit pants, and classic black shoes. He's a dark male with white hair and a man bun. It is the same description shown in the mugshot in my arrest report.
    
    And as for charges:
    • VF01: David, while operating an off-road vehicle, willfully fled a pursuing law enforcement officer.
    • VF02: David Caused an accident that resulted in bodily injury of an on-duty Law Enforcement officer, then failed to remain on scene or render aid and failed to notify law enforcement.
    • GF15: David illegally attempted to enter a vehicle that was not his with intent to commit a crime, The vehicle was the Shinobi parked outside City Hall.
    • GF16: David concealed evidence from the police with the intent to interfere and escape an investigation by law enforcement. The evidence mentioned was the Terminus he owns as it was used in an attempt to murder an on-duty law enforcement officer during his attempt to escape an arrest at city hall.
    • GM12: David, When marindarized and confirmed that he understands his rights, Gave false information to the handling officer, David stated that he does not own a terminus when asked.
    • GM19: David while wearing a mask and concealing his face was engaged in a conduct prohibited by law with the intent of avoiding identification.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Lance Sage, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    LANCE SAGE
    POLICE DETECTIVE III
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 23/DEC/2024

  

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a THIRD notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

A decision was reached in the above case on the 11th day of July, 2025.

Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be accepting the plea of guilty from the defendant. The defendant was given ample time to interact with the courts and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As little to no contact has been made with the courts in the past 3-4 weeks, this case will now be archived and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.

Respectfully,


Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

On behalf of


Associate Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]