#24-CM-0067, State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green

[Arthur Green]

Defendant Name: Arthur Green
Defendant Phone: 415-8372
Defendant Address: N/A
(( Defendant Discord: Deactivation ))
Requested Attorney: N/A

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 06/FEB/202310:08
Charge(s):

• Petty Theft
• Recieving Stolen Property
• Vandalism

Narrative:

I was improperly charged and wish to appeal my charges

---

I, Arthur Green, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Horus Russ]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 7rd of March, 2024.

I, Horus Russ, a Junior Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Arthur Green in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 414-2472 — [email protected]

[Shaun Harper]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 8th of March, 2024.

I, Shaun Harper, Chief Public Defender with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Arthur Green in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Chief Public Defender
Director of Training & Hiring
Notary Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

[Judith Mason]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 9th day of March, 2024.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.



Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

[Michael Blaise]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on 29/AUG/2024.

I, Michael Blaise, Prosecuting Attorney of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 552-8150 — [email protected]

[Nicholas Ashford]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Defendant

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on 30/SEP/2024

I, Nicholas Ashford, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Arthur Green, in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.



Junior Defence Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 454-5728 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green
#24-CM-0067

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 1st of October, 2024.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green is hereby activated by this Court under #24-CM-0067.

Both the State and Defendant have adequate representation in the case, as such, immediately following this notice, the Presiding Judge will be filing the Order for Discovery.

In accordance with guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas, this case shall require an in-person trial. Once all pretrial matters have been resolved, a Notice of Scheduling will be issued to arrange an appropriate time for trial.


Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green
#24-CM-0067

A court order was entered in the above case on 1st of October, 2024.

The case of #24-CM-0067, State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions.

So ordered,


Superior Court Judge
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 505-9925 — [email protected]

[Michael Blaise]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green
#24-CM-0067

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 1st of October, 2024.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest Report - Arthur Green, 06/MAR/2024

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  MUGSHOT

  • SUSPECT DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: Arthur Green
      Phone Number: 4158372
      Licenses Suspended: No
      Officers Involved:
      • Police Captain III Jessica Nash
      • Deputy Chief Lex Roth
      Charges:
      • VF01 - Evading an Officer
      • GM04 - Resisting Arrest
      • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      • GM08 - Vandalism
      • GM05 - Receiving Stolen Property
      • GM06 - Petty Theft
    INCIDENT NARRATIVE
    • Incident Date: 06/MAR/2024
      
      Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
      • I responded to a 911 call for a man smashing an ATM with a crowbar. When arriving on the scene I saw a man leaving on a BF400 and I turned around to pursue. The man evaded pursuit, heading up a mountain I couldn't drive up with my Buffalo cruiser. He was traced and found again in the city, wearing different clothes. He jumped off a ledge with his bike and stalled it. He tried running and punching me after being cuffed. I found the clothes on him he wore and compared it to bodycam footage of him, and it matched. He also had a crowbar and 2849 dollars of marked money on him. I was unable to suspend his license as he ran off inside DOC and hid before I could complete the process.
    EVIDENCE DETAILS
    • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
      Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
      
      Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
      • Illegal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Marked Money (value $2849)
        Exhibit B: Clothing
        Exhibit C: Crowbar
        
        
        Legal Possessions:
        Exhibit A: Radio
        Exhibit B: GPS
        Exhibit C: Bag
        Exhibit D: Hat
        
        
        Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

        

  

• Exhibit #2: Witness Statement - Police Officer I James Boxer

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 06/Mar/2024

  Witness Information

  • Name: James Boxer Date of Birth: 28/Oct/1987
    Phone Number: 500-8519
    Occupation: Police Officer I, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • I responded to a 911 call from a civillian seeing a man smashing an ATM. When I arrived near the scene, I saw a man leaving the scene on a BF400. I chased him and he evaded pursuit. We found a man on the same motorcycle, but with a different outfit on, still evading pursuit.
    
    When we arrested him, we found a crowbar, marked money (value $2849) and the clothes I saw on the man leaving the scene, on him. We held the clothes up to him to match the outfit to what was seen on the scene. The license plate matched the bike that fled the scene. His confirmed presence at the scene, the marked money and crowbar on him, as well as his repeated decisions to evade pursuit and resist arrest solidified that he was the man who smashed and robbed the ATM. I charged him with the below charges, as discussed with Chief Lex Roth.
    
    VF01 - Evading an Officer
    GM04 - Resisting Arrest
    GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
    GM08 - Vandalism
    GM05 - Receiving Stolen Property
    GM06 - Petty Theft
    
    See below uploads of the 911 Call Record Log, along with footage of him fleeing the scene and then his arrest.
    
    911 Call Record Log
    ((Bodycam RP))
    Bodycam Scene
    Bodycam Arrest

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, James Boxer, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    James Boxer
    James Boxer
    Police Officer I
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 09/Mar/2024

  

• Exhibit #3: Witness Statement - Police Captain III Jessica Nash

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 06/MAR/2024

  Witness Information

  • Name: Jessica Nash
    Date of Birth: REDACTED
    Phone Number:REDACTED
    Occupation: Captain III, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • I was minimally involved in this situation and likely was the AIR unit, as James appears to be the arresting officer. I don't have anything to add that would aid this case.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Jessica Nash, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Captain III Jessica Nash,
    Los Santos Police Department
    [/b]
    Date: 10/MAR/2024

  

• Exhibit #4: Bodycam footage - Police Officer I James Boxer, 06/MAR/2024

  ((Bodycam RP))
  Bodycam Scene
  Bodycam Arrest

• Exhibit #5: CCTV footage - Yellowjack Inn ATM

  
  
  
  
  
  (())

Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 552-8150 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  Apologies to both parties as I only recently noticed the defense counsel on the case signed on as co-counsel and not primary. The court will be giving the defense 7 days time to find a suitable primary or the current co-counsel will be moved to primary.
  
  The prosecution has posted their motion for discovery. Is the court to understand that the prosecution no longer requires time for discovery?
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Margot Rousseau]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 2nd October, 2024.

I, Margot Rousseau, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch/Private Law Firm, will be representing the Defendant, Arthur Green in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.



Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 293-8398 — [email protected]

[Michael Blaise]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Kant,
  
  The prosecution confirms that it needs no further time for discovery.
  
  
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Senior Prosecuting Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 552-8150 — [email protected]

  

[Michael Blaise]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION TO AMEND

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green
#24-CM-0067

A Motion to Amend was filed in the above case on the 2nd of October, 2024.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Amend, the original charges with the underlined amended charges.

• Original Charges
  • GM08 - Vandalism
  • GM05 - Receiving Stolen Property
  • GM06 - Petty Theft

• Amended Charges
  • GM08 - Vandalism
  • GM05 - Receiving Stolen Property

• Detailed Explanation: The Lesser Offense doctrine would prevent us from charging both GM05 and GM06 as they both relate to the stolen money. The prosecution believes it would be better if we were able to focus on the GM05 as there is more evidence as the prosecution is unable to decisively say if the defendant took the money from the ATM, whereas we can prove he had marked cash on him.

Senior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 552-8150 — [email protected]

[Aleksandar Pulaski]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 3rd of October, 2024.

I, Aleksandar Pulaski, a Prosecuting with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas, in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.


Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 365-8706 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  The prosecution has indicated they no longer need the full 7 day time period allotted for discovery. The case will now transition to the defense counsel. Please note that the time period for discovery is 72 hours, if more time is needed one may file a motion for continuance.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Nicholas Ashford]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION TO SUPPRESS

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green
#24-CM-0067

A Motion to Suppress was filed in the above case on the 1st of October, 2024.

The Defendant, Arthur Green, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion to Suppress, and requests to following be suppressed from evidence;

• Exhibit 1: Arrest Report - Arthur Green 06/MAR/2024
  Requested Evidence to Suppress: Highlighted Sections
  Sections in Green refer to Speculation, sections in yellow refer to Lack of Relevance

  • Exhibit #1: Arrest Report - Arthur Green, 06/MAR/2024

    

    

    Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

    
    

    ---

    MUGSHOT

    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • 
        Full Name: Arthur Green
        Phone Number: 4158372
        Licenses Suspended: No
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Captain III Jessica Nash
        • Deputy Chief Lex Roth
        Charges:
        • VF01 - Evading an Officer
        • GM04 - Resisting Arrest
        • GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
        • GM08 - Vandalism
        • GM05 - Receiving Stolen Property
        • GM06 - Petty Theft
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 06/MAR/2024
        
        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • I responded to a 911 call for a man smashing an ATM with a crowbar. When arriving on the scene I saw a man leaving on a BF400 and I turned around to pursue. The man evaded pursuit, heading up a mountain I couldn't drive up with my Buffalo cruiser. He was traced and found again in the city, wearing different clothes. He jumped off a ledge with his bike and stalled it. He tried running and punching me after being cuffed. I found the clothes on him he wore and compared it to bodycam footage of him, and it matched. He also had a crowbar and 2849 dollars of marked money on him. I was unable to suspend his license as he ran off inside DOC and hid before I could complete the process.
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
        
        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Marked Money (value $2849)
          Exhibit B: Clothing
          Exhibit C: Crowbar
          
          
          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Radio
          Exhibit B: GPS
          Exhibit C: Bag
          Exhibit D: Hat
          
          
          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

          

    

  • Lack of Relevance:
    I do not believe that it adds anything important to the case at hand. I also believe that this could be considered Prejudicial, I believe that it is trying to get the judge to have bias against my client by trying to suggest that he is a dishonest man.
    
    Speculation
    This section has speculated that the man was specifically leaving the scene. This explanation of the incident is also contradictory to the witness testimony given by the same officer. In his Witness Statement, the officer claims that when he was "near" the scene, he saw the suspect leaving. Whereas in this evidence this evidence suggests that, upon arriving on the scene, he observed the suspect leaving. The bodycam footage referenced also shows how this piece of evidence slightly contradicts what occurred. This is significant as it implies that the officer observed the suspect at the scene of the crime, before the suspect had left.

• Exhibit 2: Witness Statement - Police Officer I James Boxer
  Requested Evidence to Suppress: Highlighted section

  • Exhibit #2: Witness Statement - Police Officer I James Boxer

    

    

    
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

    Case Information

    • Incident Date: 06/Mar/2024

    Witness Information

    • Name: James Boxer Date of Birth: 28/Oct/1987
      Phone Number: 500-8519
      Occupation: Police Officer I, Los Santos Police Department

    Witness Statement

    • I responded to a 911 call from a civillian seeing a man smashing an ATM. When I arrived near the scene, I saw a man leaving the scene on a BF400. I chased him and he evaded pursuit. We found a man on the same motorcycle, but with a different outfit on, still evading pursuit.
      
      When we arrested him, we found a crowbar, marked money (value $2849) and the clothes I saw on the man leaving the scene, on him. We held the clothes up to him to match the outfit to what was seen on the scene. The license plate matched the bike that fled the scene. His confirmed presence at the scene, the marked money and crowbar on him, as well as his repeated decisions to evade pursuit and resist arrest solidified that he was the man who smashed and robbed the ATM. I charged him with the below charges, as discussed with Chief Lex Roth.
      
      VF01 - Evading an Officer
      GM04 - Resisting Arrest
      GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
      GM08 - Vandalism
      GM05 - Receiving Stolen Property
      GM06 - Petty Theft
      
      See below uploads of the 911 Call Record Log, along with footage of him fleeing the scene and then his arrest.
      
      911 Call Record Log
      ((Bodycam RP))
      Bodycam Scene
      Bodycam Arrest

    Witness Affirmation

    • I, James Boxer, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
      
      Signed,
      
      James Boxer
      James Boxer
      Police Officer I
      Los Santos Police Department
      
      Date: 09/Mar/2024

    

  • Speculation
    If the officer was only near the scene when he saw the suspect, is it right to assume that the suspect was coming from the ATM. Route 68, the road that the ATM is situated on, is a well used road, therefore I think that the suspect could have easily just been driving down Route 68 at an unfortunate time. I do not think it is fair to assume that the man was leaving the scene of a crime, when the officer was only "near" the scene of the crime itself.

• Exhibit 3: Witness Statement - Police Captain III Jessica Nash
  Requested Evidence to Suppress: Entire Exhibit

  • Exhibit #3: Witness Statement - Police Captain III Jessica Nash

    

    

    
    
    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

    Case Information

    • Incident Date: 06/MAR/2024

    Witness Information

    • Name: Jessica Nash
      Date of Birth: REDACTED
      Phone Number:REDACTED
      Occupation: Captain III, Los Santos Police Department

    Witness Statement

    • I was minimally involved in this situation and likely was the AIR unit, as James appears to be the arresting officer. I don't have anything to add that would aid this case.

    Witness Affirmation

    • I, Jessica Nash, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
      
      Signed,
      
      
      Captain III Jessica Nash,
      Los Santos Police Department
      [/b]
      Date: 10/MAR/2024

    

  • Lack of Relevance
    In the final line of this statement it clearly reads, "I don't have anything to add that would aid this case". This witness statement does not, as it stated, add anything to the case at hand so I believe this Exhibit should be suppressed as it does not add anything.

Junior Defence Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 454-5728 — [email protected]

[Michael Blaise]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
  
  The prosecution will be offering its rebuttal regarding the defense's motion to suppress.
  
  Exhibit 1: The prosecution does not object to the suppression of the following line, which the defense argued should be suppressed on the grounds of relevance: "I was unable to suspend his license as he ran off inside DOC and hid before I could complete the process."
  
  However, the prosecution does object to the suppression of the green-highlighted line on the grounds of alleged speculation. The officer's arrest report is based on observations made in real-time while responding to an active crime scene. The description of the suspect "leaving the scene" is corroborated by bodycam footage and the witness statement by Officer Boxer, both of which confirm the presence of the suspect in the surrounding area of the crime scene immediately after the ATM was vandalized. Furthermore, slight variances in wording between the arrest report and the witness statement ("near the scene" vs. "arriving on the scene") do not constitute material contradictions but are differences in how an officer might describe a fast-paced, unfolding event.
  
  Exhibit 2: See the above rebuttal for Exhibit 1.
  
  Exhibit 3: The prosecution will not be objecting to the suppression of this exhibit.
  
  
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Senior Prosecutor
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 552-8150 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green
#24-CM-0067

A decision was reached in the above case on the 10th day of October, 2024.

---

Exhibit #1:
The court will start with a review of the speculation claims from the defense. To begin, speculation occurs when an individual testifies to information or observations that could not have been gained with any of their 5 senses: sight, haring, smell, taste, and touch. As the officer in question was testifying to what he saw, and that claim is backed up by bodycam footage of the BF400 leaving the area that a 9-1-1 call was reported. The court will be denying this suppression request in regards to speculation.

As for the statement quoted in reference to relevance, "I was unable to suspend his license as he ran off inside DOC and hid before I could complete the process." The court will be granting this suppression as both sides are in agreement.

---

Exhibit #2:
The court will be denying this suppression in regards to relevance for the reason given above.

---

Exhibit #3:
The court will grant a suppression of the entire exhibit. Due to both parties being in agreement.

So Ordered,


Superior Court Judge
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  As neither prosecution nor defense has raised any objections to my previous ruling, the court will now move onto scheduling the trial. Once availability has been posted by either party, please notify the docket. Thank you.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green
#24-CM-0067

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 14th of October, 2024.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Michael Blaise]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
  
  The prosecution has scheduled its availability.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Senior Prosecutor
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 552-8150 — [email protected]

[Nicholas Ashford]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
  
  The defence has scheduled its availability.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Public Defence Attorney
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 454-5728 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Prosecution and defense counsel,
  
  I am requesting notice from the defense. If the defendant is not available for trial, is he amenable to the court scheduling a trial without him? Thank you to all parties for your patience.
  
  If the defendant answers affirmatively, then the case will be scheduled on Friday. An official notice will be posted when the court receives the response.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Arthur Green]

Hello,

I would like to be present for my trial so if we could schedule a time that works for everyone that would be much appreciated

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Arthur Green
#24-CM-0067

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 17th of October, 2024.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]