#23-CM-0094, State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma

Post by **LindenThuynsma** » Thu Jul 20, 2023 10:08 pm

Defendant Name: Linden Thuynsma
Defendant Phone: 2686874
Defendant Address: 1 Fudge Ln
(( Defendant Discord: lindenthuynsma ))
Requested Attorney: Hayley Star,Jay Garbanzo

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s)00:16 UTC 19/July/2023
Charge(s):

Face Concealment, Class 1 FireArms Possession, False imprisonment of a Gov Employee

Narrative:
I Linden Thuynsma, Disagree with all the above charges as i was clocked on at Bayview Repairs at the time the crime happened.

I, Linden Thuynsma, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

Post by **Haylee Star** » Thu Jul 20, 2023 10:31 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 20th of July, 2023.

I, Haylee Star, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Linden Thuynsma in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Haylee Star
Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 390-1560 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Fri Jul 21, 2023 4:25 am

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 21st day of July, 2023.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Shaun Harper** » Mon Jul 31, 2023 10:14 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the First of August, 2023.

I, Shaun Harper, Chief Public Defender with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Linden Thuynsma in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

Post by **Kendall Groyce** » Tue Aug 15, 2023 10:17 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 15th of August, 2023.

I, Kendall Groyce, a Prosecuting with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas, Name in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Junior Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 489-9881 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Wed Oct 11, 2023 11:23 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on the 11th day of October, 2023.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma is hereby activated by this Court under #23-CM-0094.

Both the State and Defendant have adequate representation in the case, as such, immediately following this notice, the Presiding Judge will be filing the Order for Discovery.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Wed Oct 11, 2023 11:28 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A court order was entered in the above case on the 11th day of October, 2023.

The case of #23-CM-0094, State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma is hereby opened and acknowledged by the Court.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to provide all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket the defense can begin filing motions. Further, the court would like to acknowledge an upcoming approved Leave of Absence for the primary counsel for the defense. As such, the court will accommodate a continuance when the time comes as necessary.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Kendall Groyce** » Fri Oct 13, 2023 12:52 am

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuysnma
#23-CM-0094

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 12th of October, 2023.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

Exhibit #1: Arrest Report, Los Santos Police Department
Arrest Report of Linden Thuynsma, 19/JUL/2023
Los Santos Police Department
ARREST REPORT
"TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

MUGSHOT
- SUSPECT DETAILS
  
  Full Name: Linden Thuynsma
  Phone Number: 2686874
  Licenses Suspended: No
  Officers Involved:
  
  Police Detective II Samuel Martin
  
  Police Lieutenant I Bill Breacher
  
  Police Officer III Philo Marks
  
  Charges:
  
  WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
  
  GM21 - False Imprisonment of a Gov. Employee
  
  GM19 - Face Concealment (b)
  
  INCIDENT NARRATIVE
  
  Incident Date: 19/JUL/2023
  
  Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
  
  A call came in from MD of a medic not responsive that dropped a panic. A solo unit, Bill BReacher, arrived first on scene and saw one male with a gun run and drive away in a tan Kamacho.
  
  An investigation was started on the suspects and the vehicle. Police Detective located the owner of the vehicle at Bayview then the Bayview clothing store. Two suspects were spotted inside the clothing store. With both matching clothing descriptions of the males involved in holding up MD.
  
  The suspect spotted with the firearm was found to have the rest of the clothing that didn't match in his pockets. The suspect in the back passenger seat was found to have ditched his t-shirt as it was not recovered.
  
  MD was able to voice and visually ID both suspects as being involved.
  
  Overall both suspect articles of clothing that we had matched, the voices matched and the owner of the vehicle matched to the suspect.
  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS
  
  Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
  Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
  
  Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
  
  Illegal Possessions:
  Exhibit A: Mask
  Exhibit B: Shoes
  Exhibit C: Pants
  
  Legal Possessions:
  Exhibit A: Radio
  Exhibit B: Fishingrod
  Exhibit C: Bat
  Exhibit D: Knife
  Exhibit E: **Bodycam Image** ((https://i.imgur.com/W7muZ3o.png))
  Exhibit F: **Bodycam Image #2** ((https://i.imgur.com/Bj46pIZ.png))
  
  Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

Exhibit #2: Witness Statement of Samuel Martin, Los Santos Police Department
Police Detective II Martin, Witness Statement
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Case Information
- Incident Date: 19/JUL/2023
Witness Information
- Name: Samuel Martin
  Date of Birth: REDACTED
  Phone Number: REDACTED
  Occupation: Police Detective
Witness Statement
- Overall the arrest report has all the known details known to PD during the arrest. The suspect is the Registered Owner of the Kamacho seen in the bodycam images shown in the arrest report. During the detainment, the suspect was found buying new clothes at the clothing store next to Bayview.
  
  The suspect has the same clothing on his person / in his pockets as the suspect in the bodycam footage.
  
  If anything else is needed I will happily answer but I think everything we can give is stated in the arrest report and shown in the image of the suspects items inside the arrest report.
Witness Affirmation
- I, Samuel Martin, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
  
  Signed,
  
  Samuel Martin
  Police Detective II
  Los Santos Police Department
  
  Date: 02/AUG/2023

Exhibit #3: Witness Statement of Philo Marks, Los Santos Police Department
Police Officer III Marks, Witness Statement
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Case Information
- Incident Date: 19/JUL/2023
Witness Information
- Name: Philo Marks
  Date of Birth: 01/SEP/2023
  Phone Number: 219-4844
  Occupation: Police Officer
Witness Statement
- We had responded to a department radio call, asking us to assist a Medic's panic call at the pier. While we were there, we reviewed and received the bodycam footage from the Medic who was held at gunpoint by an individual in a Grey overcoat, dark pants, and a Black T-Shirt mask.
  
  In the bodycam, we were able to make out a vehicle plate, and running it through our MDC, it came back to a Linden Thuynsma. Using our tools available in the Detective Bureau, we were able to pin-point where Mr. Thuynsma was, which was a clothing store in Paleto.
  
  We arrived on scene, and we saw an individual in the store. We were trying to detain the individual, but due to the man being belligerent, and spouting weird words at us, ((a lot of IC/OOC mixing, requiring an admin sit and a lot of pausing)), we completely missed Mr. Thuynsma. ((To all LEO involved, he was invisible to us.))
  
  Looking through the store again, we found that Mr. Thuynsma was there in plain sight the whole time, and he was completely compliant with our investigation. He informed us that his Kamacho, which matched 1:1 to what was in the bodycam, was at Bayview, and that during a period of time, was taken from behind the locked gate for about 5 - 10 minutes, during the timeframe in which the situation with the Medic happened.
  
  We reviewed CCTV, and were able to see a masked man wearing everything the individual we've detained was wearing, step into the Kamacho, and leave from the area. We questioned Mr. Thuynsma on if anyone else would have keys to his vehicle, and he did state that yes, there were others that had keys to his vehicle, but too many to name off.
  
  With the chaos of the other Bayview employees completely disregarding our orders of giving us space to conduct our police work, we moved from Bayview down to Mission Row, were we finished out questioning, and concluded our investigative work.
Witness Affirmation
- I, Philo Marks, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
  
  Signed,
  
  Philo Marks
  Police Officer III
  Los Santos Police Department
  
  Date: 03/AUG/2023

Exhibit #4: Witness Statement of Bill Breacher, Los Santos Police Department
Police Lieutenant Breacher, Witness Statement
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Case Information
- Incident Date: 19/JUL/2023
Witness Information
- Name: Bill Breacher
  Date of Birth: 07/JUL/1983
  Phone Number: 380-3680
  Occupation: Police Lieutenant, Los Santos Police Department
Witness Statement
- We had received a call from MD that a medic was non-responsive, and afterwards that they were being held at gunpoint by someone. Upon responding to the scene, I arrived before any other units and found a tan camo Kamacho was parked next to an ambulance, with a medic down on their knees and someone in a long dark jacket and a black t-shirt mask holding them hostage. There were two other individuals in the Kamacho as well both wearing masks. Upon seeing me, the individual with the gun began to run and get into the Kamacho leaving them medic behind and they drove off. Due to me being a solo officer, I approached carefully for my own safety as I had no backup yet. I called out on the radio the description of the Kamacho as other units were not far behind and they began to chase it. The medic was able to remember the license plate of the kamacho and one of our detectives tracked down the registered owner to Paleto Bay inside a clothing store. Upon arriving at the clothing store, there were two people inside, both of which matched the clothing descriptions, or had clothing on them perfectly matching the clothing worn by our suspects. We further found the exact Kamacho used close by parked at the Bayview employee parking lot. We eventually took both of these individuals back to Mission Row where we had the medic that took them each hostage look at each of them and listen to their voice to ID our suspects as the ones who took them hostage, to which the medic positively ID'd them both, at which point we had our suspects beyond a reasonable doubt identified. We charged them and took them to DOC.
  
  I will additionally provide my body camera footage here as well as further evidence of the situation and my observations.
Witness Affirmation
- I, Bill Breacher, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
  
  Signed,
  
  Bill Breacher
  Police Lieutenant
  Los Santos Police Department
  
  Date: 02/AUG/2023

Exhibit #5: Body Camera Footage, Los Santos Police Department
Video Evidence via Body Camera Footage
Additional video evidence, as captured and provided by Lieutenant Bill Breacher's on-duty Los Santos Police Department body camera.

Body Camera Footage

((
Body Camera RP Proof
))

Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 489-9881 — [email protected]

Post by **Shaun Harper** » Fri Oct 13, 2023 12:48 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 13th of October, 2023.

The Defendant, Linden Thuynsma, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

Reasoning: Primary attorney on LOA
- Detailed Explanation: The defense attorney is going on an approved LOA soon and will not be able to respond.

Respectfully,

Chief Public Defender
Director of Training & Hiring
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Sat Oct 14, 2023 11:03 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A decision was reached in the above case on the 14th day of October, 2023.

The Motion for Continuance filed by the defense on the 13th of October is granted. The court will set the deadline for defense response to the Motion for Discovery to be on the 24th of October at 11:59pm.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Shaun Harper** » Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:01 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 23rd of October, 2023.

The Defendant, Linden Thuynsma, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

Reasoning: Gathering evidence
- Detailed Explanation: The defense is actively collecting additional evidence for this case. We kindly request another continuance to ensure a fair and comprehensive presentation of our client's case. This additional time will allow us to better serve the interests of justice by providing a well-prepared and thorough defense.

Respectfully,

Chief Public Defender
Director of Training & Hiring
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Fri Oct 27, 2023 12:44 am

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A decision was reached in the above case on the 27th day of October, 2023.

The Motion for Continuance filed by the defense on the 23rd of October is hereby granted. The deadline for any further motions shall be set for first thing on the 31st of October, thus giving the defense a full 7 days since the filing of the Continuance.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Tue Oct 31, 2023 2:14 am

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on the 31st day of October, 2023.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intention of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Shaun Harper** » Tue Oct 31, 2023 2:17 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

WITNESS LIST

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A Witness List was filed in the above case on the 31st of October, 2023.

The defense designates the following list of individuals as witnesses, who may be called to the stand.

Name of Witness:
Leo Crail
Description: (party, fact witness, expert, other)
Fact witness
Witness Agency:
N/A

Chief Public Defender
Director of Training & Hiring
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Sun Nov 05, 2023 10:10 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on the 31st day of October, 2023.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intention of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:46 am

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF TRIAL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A trial date was set on the above case on the 10th day of November, 2023.

In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 7:30 PM on the 12th day of November, 2023 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:13 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

Parties,

Due to a scheduling miscommunication on the part of the court, trial has been delayed for 45 minutes after the original scheduled time, now set to begin at approximately 8:15pm.

Respectfully,

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:50 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A decision was reached in the above case on the 12th day of November, 2023.

The case of #23-CM-0094, State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma has been resolved.

On the 19th of July, 2023, law enforcement officers with the Los Santos Police Department responded to a call regarding an unresponsive medic with the Los Santos Emergency Medical Services at the Del Perro Pier.

As Lieutenant Bill Breacher arrived as the first unit on scene, as shown in the body-camera footage, an on-duty medic can be seen on their knees with their hands up as an unidentified suspect wearing a long gray jacket, dark pants, and a black mask fashioned from what appears to be a t-shirt can be seen looking directly over them while holding a gun.

Lieutenant Breacher can then be seen in the footage approaching the scene as the masked individual gets into the driver’s seat of a tan in color Kamacho, ultimately leaving the scene with two other individuals in the passenger seats.

While investigating the incident, law enforcement officers were able to ascertain the license plate of the tan Kamacho, which then identified the registered owner, Linden Thuynsma, as the primary suspect. Shortly after, Mr. Thuynsma was located near Bayview Auto Center, and shortly after, at a Paleto Bay clothing store nearby.

During Mr. Thuynsma’s subsequent questioning, officers were told by the defendant that his Kamacho was at Bayview Auto Center, however, had recently been taken, allegedly unbeknownst to Mr. Thuynsma, for a short period of time around the time that the incident with the medic occurred at the Pier.

Additionally, a review of the CCTV footage by law enforcement officers at the Bayview Auto Center is reported to reveal a masked individual, matching the description of Mr. Thuynsma at the time of his detainment, was seen entering the tan Kamacho at Bayview Auto Center from the locked employee parking lot and driving away.

Lastly, following the questioning of the defendant at the clothing store, law enforcement conducted further investigation at Mission Row, where the victim of the crime is claimed to have confirmed the identity of the suspect by way of voice matching.

The prosecution has asserted that the masked individual shown on Lieutenant Breacher’s body-camera footage is the defendant Mr. Linden Thuynsma, and further, that due to the clothing from the footage matching the clothing found on Mr. Thuynsma at the time of his detainment, in addition to the vocal identification provided by the victim of the crime, and lastly, the Kamacho seen in the body-camera footage matching the Kamacho owned by the defendant, point towards a guilty finding.

The defense has claimed, however, that the defendant was at Bayview Auto Center for the entirety of the incident and thus is not liable for the charges being sought. The defense’s witness, Mr. Leo Crail, during his oral testimony before the court asserted that the defendant had been with him when his Kamacho had been taken from Bayview Auto Center and thus has introduced doubt that the defendant may not be the one pictured in the body-camera footage.

However, with the witness attesting to this fact having been charged with GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer within the past few months, the witness’s credibility to attest to this fact has been called into question. Given the conviction from this charge, the court finds the witness not to be credible.

The court has found that the evidence provided by the prosecution is sufficient to believe that the individual in the body-camera footage is the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt, given the several points of identification provided in the various exhibits and matching characteristics found in the body-camera footage.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

On the count of WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm, I find the defendant, Linden Thuynsma, guilty.
On the count of GM19 - Face Concealment (b), I find the defendant, Linden Thuynsma, guilty.
On the count of GM21 - False Imprisonment, I find the defendant, Linden Thuynsma, guilty.

In accordance with Judicial Branch policy, the defendant shall be required to pay $25,000 to both compensate the court for its time, effort, and resources expended during the case.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Wed Jan 24, 2024 9:21 am

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RE-ACTIVATION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A Notice of Re-Activation was entered in the above case on the 24th of January, 2024.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma is hereby re-activated by this Court under #23-CM-0094.

In accordance with the ruling from #23-AP-0014, Linden Thuynsma v. State of San Andreas, this court's verdict issued on the 12th Day of November, 2023 has been vacated and the defendant shall be afforded the right to a new trial based on the facts presented in the San Andreas Court of Appeals.

As such, this case has been re-activated under the previous docket number of #23-CM-0094 and shall proceed from the point of pretrial, under the presumption that all previously submitted motions from the original case remain intact unless otherwise noted by counsel.

The court would request that a confirmation of counsel from both parties be presented to ensure that both parties are appropriately represented, at which point, a period of 7 days shall commence to allow for any pretrial motions to be submitted, including the one provided by the appellant in the Court of Appeals. Following the 7 day period, the court shall render a decision on any pending motions and a scheduling tool shall be sent to arrange a time for trial.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

Post by **Shaun Harper** » Wed Jan 24, 2024 1:14 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 24th of January, 2024.

I, Shaun Harper, Chief Public Defender with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Linden Thuynsma in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 308-7889 — [email protected]

Post by **Frank Raven** » Thu Jan 25, 2024 9:11 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2024.

I, Frank Raven, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Linden Thuynsma in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Frank Raven
Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
5356160 — [email protected]

Post by **Mary Burrows** » Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:00 am

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 28th of January, 2024

I, Mary Burrows, Prosecuting Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Prosecuting Attorney
Notary Clerk
Training and Hiring Staff
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 339-5979 — [email protected]

Post by **Mary Burrows** » Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:11 pm

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A Motion for Voluntary Dismissal was filed in the above case on the 28th of January, 2024.

The State of San Andreas by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

Reasoning: New developments of evidence.
- Detailed Explanation: Evidence has been brought up placing the accused at Bayview during the incident securing the alibi of the defendant.

Prosecuting Attorney
Notary Clerk
Training and Hiring Staff
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 339-5979 — [email protected]

Post by **Judith Mason** » Fri Feb 02, 2024 12:39 am

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Linden Thuynsma
#23-CM-0094

A decision was reached in the above case on the 2nd day of February, 2024.

The Prosecution's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal as filed on the 28th of January is hereby granted. The charges against the defendant shall be expunged and the defendant shall be entitled to compensation in the amount of $22,500. The defendant is instructed to collect this compensation from a qualified member of the San Andreas Judicial Branch at the Rockford Hills City Hall.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 257-9183 — [email protected]

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards