Appellant Name: State of San Andreas
Appellant Attorney(s): Roderick Marchisio, Gregory Kumerow
Appellant Attorney(s): Roderick Marchisio, Gregory Kumerow
Trial Docket Number: #23-CM-0036
Presiding Trial Judge: Robert Winejudge
Notice of Appeal Filed:
Presiding Trial Judge: Robert Winejudge
Notice of Appeal Filed:
- [ ] Before Verdict
[ X ] After Verdict
Reason for Notice of Appeal:
- [ ] Motion to be overturned
[ ] Errors in the trials procedure
[ X ] Errors in the judge's interpretation of the law
[ ] New evidence proving appellants innocence
- In their verdict, the presiding judge ruled the following conclusion:
The prosecution believes that with the evidence as presented to the court, not only the intent of the action has been proven, but the very highest level of intent possible. This is a gross misinterpretation and/or misconstruction of very clearly defined legal doctrine. Therefore, the prosecution notes that we are appealing on grounds of legal error and appellate review of legal issues rather than the procedure as a whole or fact-based evidence. As such, the double jeopardy is not applicable and this appeal should be found admissible.the prosecution has failed to estabilish the defendant's intention to actually interfere with an investigation.
The prosecution would like to receive the opportunity to further elaborate their position in a written brief when not constrained by the 150 word limit.