Motion for Involuntary Dismissal
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Motion for Involuntary Dismissal
Honorable Mason,
Sincerely,
Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]
Motion for Involuntary Dismissal
Honorable Mason,
- We the Prosecution in the case below are requesting an involuntary dismissal from the court, please find the reason for it below.
State of San Andreas v. Akio Yamada
Assigned Court Case Number: #23-CM-0008
Requesting Party: Prosecution
Party Members: Roderick Marchisio
Involuntary Dismissal: Breach of court protocol, violation of good process order and breach of Code of Ethics
Detailed explanation:
As the Defense has admitted publicly on the Docket, the Defense has been in contact with a party that is being represented by the Prosecution, namely a law enforcement officer working for the State. In this respect, the Prosecution notes that the Defense has obtained a Witness Statement from the Officer by contacting them privately. Further, it is obvious that the witness statement that has been obtained by the Defense - which has been provided to the presiding judge privately - contains information that is to be considered both confidential and privileged. As such, it is obvious that with these ridiculous procedural tactics the Defense has willingly and knowingly interfered with court protocal and has violated the good process order that can be expected from parties that adhere to the Rule of Law.
Further, the Prosecution notes that each and every one of the Defense attorneys named to this underlying case are all bar certified with the San Andreas Judicial Branch and therefore are deemed to adhere to the Code of Ethics. In this respect, the Prosecution refers to the various sections of the Code of Ethics, including but not limited to V - Relationship to the Adverse Party under e.: An attorney shall not come into any contact with the adverse party without the knowledge of the party's counsel or without the knowledge of his or her own client.
Given the fact that the Defense is actively using the argument of the witness statement of the Officer in question, as well as their own admittance, it is evidently clear the Defense has violated the Code of Ethics with the sole purpose of gaining an advantage in the underlying case.
Following the above, the Prosecution deems it clear that the Defense has intentionally not only brought harm to the legal certainty that can and should be expected from parties in the courts of the State of San Andreas as well as the courts image but also to the evidence the Prosecution is presenting in the underlying case. As such, the Prosecution is requesting the court the following:
- 1. That the appeal in the underlying case be formally dismissed;
- 2. That the presiding judge takes a decision surrounding the Motion to Amend Charges with the evidence as already provided to the court;
- 3. These allegations formally forwarded by the presiding judge to the Bar Ethics Review Board for further investigation.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Deputy Attorney General
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 372-7719 — [email protected]