#26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Locked
Luca Quinn
Posts: 7
Joined: 24 Jan 2022, 07:46
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

#26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Luca Quinn »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Lukas Quinn
Defendant Phone: #1601
(( Defendant Discord: definitelynotaleks ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT 11+ ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney
Image
Charging Department: Los Santos Police Department
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 14/MAR/2026 - 11:00 AM (UTC)
Charge(s):
  • Grand Theft
  • Evading an Officer
  • Receiving Stolen Property
  • Face Concealment (b)
  • Reckless Operation of a Road or Marine Vehicle
Narrative:
I was wrongly charged.



I, Lukas Quinn, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
User avatar
Adam Patrone
Judicial Branch
Posts: 256
Joined: 29 Dec 2025, 18:50
ECRP Forum Name: TheSnipe
Discord: TheSnipe

Re: #26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Adam Patrone »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF RECEIPT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn
#26-BT-0028

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 16th day of March, 2026.


The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,

Image
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Adam Patrone
Judicial Branch
Posts: 256
Joined: 29 Dec 2025, 18:50
ECRP Forum Name: TheSnipe
Discord: TheSnipe

Re: #26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Adam Patrone »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn
#26-BT-0028

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 16th day of March, 2026.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,

Image
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Rowin Lawson
Judicial Branch
Posts: 726
Joined: 14 Jan 2024, 19:03
ECRP Forum Name: akcoffeeman
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Rowin Lawson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v.
#26-BT-0028

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 16th day of April, 2026.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

  • Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request an additional week to collect evidence. The arresting department is in process of providing additional documents.


Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Adam Patrone
Judicial Branch
Posts: 256
Joined: 29 Dec 2025, 18:50
ECRP Forum Name: TheSnipe
Discord: TheSnipe

Re: #26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Adam Patrone »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn
#26-BT-0028

A decision was reached in the above case on the 17th day of April, 2026.


A Motion for Continuance is hereby granted for one week from the filing date.


So Ordered,

Image
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Rowin Lawson
Judicial Branch
Posts: 726
Joined: 14 Jan 2024, 19:03
ECRP Forum Name: akcoffeeman
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Rowin Lawson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn
#26-BT-0028

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 23rd day of April, 2026.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

  • Reasoning: The prosecution would like to request one additional week, we are awaiting response from The Arresting department prior to proceeding.


Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Adam Patrone
Judicial Branch
Posts: 256
Joined: 29 Dec 2025, 18:50
ECRP Forum Name: TheSnipe
Discord: TheSnipe

Re: #26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Adam Patrone »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"


COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn
#26-BT-0028

A decision was reached in the above case on the 23rd day of April, 2026.


Upon consideration, the motion for a continuance of an additional week is hereby granted, as the delay is attributable to the arresting department.

The Court strongly encourages the arresting department to expedite the collection and submission of evidence to the prosecution to avoid further delay in these proceedings.


So Ordered,

Image
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Image
Luca Quinn
Posts: 7
Joined: 24 Jan 2022, 07:46
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

Re: #26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Luca Quinn »

hey judge Patrone,

since there are so many other people with cases and the attorney general is going to keep asking for an additional week, i'll consider this case closed. mostly because the LSPD did their job with my internal affairs report and refunded me the money from the charges, and admitted that Elise is a numpty, in my words, not theirs.

thanks though
User avatar
Adam Patrone
Judicial Branch
Posts: 256
Joined: 29 Dec 2025, 18:50
ECRP Forum Name: TheSnipe
Discord: TheSnipe

Re: #26-BT-0028 State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn

Post by Adam Patrone »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Lukas Quinn
#26-BT-0028

A decision was reached in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2026.


The disputed charge(s) will remain the record of the defendant. The defendant is reminded to keep any wording on the docket professional going forward. Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.

Respectfully,

Image
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Bench Trials”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest