Date & Time of Incident(s): 07/FEB/2026 12:01AM Charge(s):
SF02 - Accessory to murder of a GOV employee
VF01 - Evading an Officer
Narrative:
My client believes they have been wrongfully charged.
I, Levy Gold, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF RECEIPT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Felarx Knight
#26-BT-0027
The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 8th day of March, 2026.
The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.
Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.
Respectfully,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
The State of San Andreas v. Felarx Knight
#26-BT-0027
A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 8th day of March, 2026.
The case of State of San Andreas v. Felarx Knight is hereby activated and opened by this Court.
The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.
The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.
If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue
Respectfully,
Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]
Hello, I will be acting as Primary council due to Levy Gold being on LOA. He has recovered from his new STD but has now been labelled a flight due to his religion.
I would also like to remind the court it has been more than 30 days with no motion filed for continuance. This has put me as the primary council at an utter disadvantage and is wasting my clients precious time. I would like to request this case being thrown out as they clearly do not have any evidence to provide and yet again, my client is innocent.
Full Name: Amir Sultan Badge Number: 15325 Callsign: G14
INCIDENT NARRATIVE
Date of Incident: 2026-03-07 Deputies Involved: Multiple Deputies
Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to validate the justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
The suspect was pulled over by a unit after being spotted leaving a bank roberry/shootout, the individual complied and got out of the vehicle, placed in cuffs and they found packed cash. Two seconds later 2 individuals stepped in and shot the sheriff before killing him.
Method of Identification
Gov issued document (ID)
CONFISCATED EVIDENCE DETAILS
Document the possessions confiscated from the charged suspect. Illegal evidence must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal evidence are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
Where possible the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
Location of Evidence Locker: N/A
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
Exhibit #2 Witness Statment Detective Sultan
San Andreas Judicial Branch Official Witness Statement "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
Case Information
Case Number: [CIR] 26-BT-0027 Incident Date: 07/MAR/2026
Witness Information
Name: Amir Sultan Date of Birth: 20/FEB/1995 Phone Number: 2934102 Occupation: Detective, LSCSD
Witness Statement
Hello, Detective Sultan here.
Regarding the arrest of Felarx Knight, I will provide my account of the events and all relevant information.
We received a call from bank security reporting an alarm at Zancudo Bank. Upon arrival, a unit observed individuals associated with the Empire group, identified through the registered owners of vehicles present at the scene.
A vehicle belonging to Felarx Knight was observed at the bank and was later located by a Sheriff on Gentry Lane, behind Empire’s headquarters. A 10-55 was initiated. The Sheriff remained in position, waiting for a PD Sergeant to arrive before initiating the traffic stop.
During this time, units were actively communicating over TAC to ensure officer safety, as the Empire group is known for ambushing law enforcement during traffic stops.
The Sheriff then radioed that Felarx Knight was “heavy on radio” and proceeded Code 6, approaching the driver on foot. According to the Sheriff’s bodycam footage, the suspect complied with instructions. During a pat-down, a large amount of packed cash was discovered on his person.
The Sheriff confirmed over the radio that the individual was Felarx Knight and that he had packed cash. Seconds later, a distress call was made indicating that officers were under fire. Bodycam footage shows the Sheriff being shot at from multiple angles.
Approximately 30 seconds later, additional units arrived on scene and engaged the suspects. Two individuals were apprehended — one deceased and one injured and taken into custody.
During this incident, the primary suspect, Felarx Knight, fled the scene while in cuffs, either on foot or with assistance from another individual.
Following an investigation and review of bodycam footage, the following charges were applied:
1x Bank Robbery — The suspect was present at the bank and in possession of packed cash.
1x Evading an Officer — The suspect fled the scene within seconds while law enforcement was still engaged with active shooters.
1x Accessory to Murder of a Government Employee — The circumstances indicate a coordinated ambush on law enforcement with the intent to assist Felarx Knight in escaping.
Felarx Knight later turned himself in at a separate location, not in proximity to the original scene. After being read his rights, he stated that he did not request assistance or an ambush. However, he did not remain on scene and chose to flee.
This concludes my account of the incident.
Witness Affirmation
I, Amir Sultan, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion.((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
Signed,
Amir Sultan
Detective
Los Santos County Sheriff's Department
Date: 30/03/2026
Rowin Lawson Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
NOTICE OF SCHEDULING
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Felarx Knight
#26-BT-0027
An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 11th day of April, 2026.
All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.
In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.
In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.
If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.
Respectfully,
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
Hello, I would like the court to take into account that the prosecution did not file for a motion to continue on this case. They ultimately overstayed the 30 day timeframe. I did not realise deadlines do not matter in the justice system. This is an utter waste of my time. I would also suggest that after 30 days of trying to put together a single witness statement with no evidence you remove the filler text as currently it states my client was in possession of a .50 and 12 grams of cocaine. He was not. Alongside this there is no actual documented evidence against Felarx Knight, there is just Amir Sultans word.
This case has became a waste of court resources and time and I suggest it gets looked at.
The Defendant, Felarx Knight, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves this Court for an Order suppressing all evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful stop, detention, search, and subsequent seizure, in violation of the Defendant’s constitutional rights.
I. INTRODUCTION
This motion seeks to exclude all physical evidence, observations, and derivative evidence obtained by law enforcement during and after the stop of the Defendant on March 7, 2026.
The evidence in question includes, but is not limited to:
-Alleged “packed cash” recovered from the Defendant
-Any statements made during or after the detention
-Any observations made following the unlawful stop and search
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
According to the State’s own report:
Law enforcement responded to a reported bank alarm at Zancudo Bank.
A vehicle allegedly associated with the Defendant was later observed away from the bank.
The Defendant was located and detained during a traffic stop on Gentry Lane.
The Defendant complied with all instructions and was placed in handcuffs.
A pat-down search was conducted, during which “packed cash” was discovered.
No clear evidence has been presented demonstrating that the Defendant was directly involved in the reported bank robbery at the time of the stop.
III. LEGAL ARGUMENT
A. The Traffic Stop Lacked Probable Cause or Reasonable Suspicion
Law enforcement must possess specific, articulable facts giving rise to reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed before initiating a stop.
Here, the stop was based solely on:
The alleged presence of a vehicle linked to the Defendant near a prior scene
General suspicion of association with a group
There is no indication that:
The Defendant was observed committing a crime
The Defendant was identified as a suspect prior to the stop
Any traffic violation justified the stop
Mere proximity to a location or association with others does not establish reasonable suspicion. Therefore, the stop was unlawful.
B. The Evidence Is Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
Because the initial stop and subsequent search were unlawful, all evidence obtained must be suppressed under the “fruit of the poisonous tree.”
This includes:
-The alleged cash
-Any statements made by the Defendant
-Any investigative conclusions derived from the unlawful stop
D. Failure to Provide Properly Documented Evidence
The State has failed to provide:
-A detailed inventory of seized evidence
-Proper documentation of confiscated items
-Supporting body camera footage referenced in their report
This failure further undermines the reliability and admissibility of the evidence.
IV. CONCLUSION
Law enforcement acted without sufficient legal justification in stopping, detaining, and searching the Defendant. The evidence obtained as a result of these actions was acquired in violation of the Defendant’s rights and must be suppressed.
I respectfully request that this Court:
-Suppress all physical evidence obtained from the Defendant, including the alleged “packed cash”;
-Suppress any statements made by the Defendant during or after the unlawful detention;
-Exclude any derivative evidence obtained as a result of the unlawful stop and search;
San Andreas Judicial Branch Superior Court of San Andreas "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"
COURT DECISION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS
State of San Andreas v. Felarx Knight
#26-BT-0027
A decision was reached in the above case on the 17th day of April, 2026.
MOTION TO SUPPRESS
Exhibit: Exhibit #2 Witness Statment Detective Sultan Quoted Statement:
"During a pat-down, a large amount of packed cash was discovered on his person."
"The suspect was present at the bank and in possession of packed cash."
"Following an investigation and review of bodycam footage, the following charges were applied:
1x Bank Robbery — The suspect was present at the bank and in possession of packed cash.
1x Evading an Officer — The suspect fled the scene within seconds while law enforcement was still engaged with active shooters.
1x Accessory to Murder of a Government Employee — The circumstances indicate a coordinated ambush on law enforcement with the intent to assist Felarx Knight in escaping.
"
Objections: Fourth Amendment Violations Decision: Sustained Reasoning: The court finds that the officer's stop of the defendant, based on a second-hand account from a detective who allegedly witnessed the defendant at a bank robbery, lacked specific identification or any documented probable cause. Therefore, the court can only find that the traffic stop violated the defendant's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Additionally, the accounts of packed money made, while referenced minimally, completely lack firsthand evidence and proper documentation, specifically the arrest report. Finally, there is no reference in evidence, per the witness's statement, to any investigation or body camera footage conducted that would have justified probable cause for the traffic stop. The requested statements submitted per the motion are suppressed, and a further general ruling will follow.
Objections: Fourth Amendment Violations Decision: Sustained Reasoning: Same as Exhibit #2
MOTION FOR INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
A Motion for Involuntary dismissal was filed for this case and was accepted.
Based on the defense's objections and a review of the evidence, the court finds no probable cause submitted into evidence. It is with a good conscience that the court cannot recognize the arrest report of a witness statement, without further evidence, as a basis for any probable cause for the stop of the defendant. Following an infringement, as referenced above, of their Fourth Amendment rights, the court finds a substantial lack of evidentiary support for any of the charges placed upon the defendant. Exhibit #1 notes the lack of detail and any links that would have given probable cause for the charges the defendant faces. Exhibit #2 is a narrative without evidentiary support and relies on second-hand accounts. Without any foundation in the evidence, the court does not find sufficient cause to proceed with this case.
The disputed charge(s) of Accessory to SF02 - Murder (Gov. Emp.) and VF01 - Evading an Officer will be removed from the record of the defendant. Thank you to both parties, this case is hereby dismissed.
The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $60000 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.
Respectfully,
Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]
