#26-CM-0002 State of San Andreas vs. Swat Nixon

Post by **Swat Nixon** » 22 Jan 2025, 12:11

Defendant Name: Swat Nixon
Defendant Phone: 216-4573
(( Defendant Discord: swatnixon ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT-6 ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 20/Jan/2025 22:46
Charge(s):

Terrorism and False Imprisonment of a Hostage

Narrative:
I have spoken to my attorney and have chosen to use my right to remain silent.

I, Swat Nixon, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

Post by **Finlay Mcculloch** » 02 Feb 2025, 13:55

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 2nd day of February, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Court Clerk / Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]

Post by **Sayaka Yukimura** » 27 Apr 2025, 04:20

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#25-BT-0054

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 26th day of April, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

Post by **Daniel Carmello** » 30 Apr 2025, 07:59

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#25-BT-0054

A Motion for Change of Venue was filed in the above case on the 30th of April, 2025.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Change of Venue, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

Requested Venue: Formal Criminal Trial
- Detailed Explanation: A charge like this should not be handled within a bench trial. This is a serious charge that has made the defendant unable to apply for business licenses, property requests, property leases and a firearms license. Allowing a charge of this severity to be held in a bench trial would not allow the defense to work on this case at our full potential. A longer trial would also allow us to analyze the evidence better and give our own evidence within this case. We also believe that precedence should be allowed in this case, with the severity of this charge.

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 313 — [email protected]

Post by **Sayaka Yukimura** » 10 May 2025, 02:44

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

Parties,

Can the defense confirm that the wish for a formal criminal trial is the defendant's as well, and also that the defendant understands that it will take significantly longer to conclude this case?

Respectfully,

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

Post by **Terence Williams** » 11 May 2025, 01:42

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Honorable Judge Yukimura and pertaining parties,

The Prosecution has no objection to the above motion.

Regards,

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

Post by **Daniel Carmello** » 13 May 2025, 05:40

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

Honorable Judge Yukimura,

This was explained to the defendant and the defendant seemed to have no issues with getting this trial moved to a formal criminal trial. The defendant does understand that this will be a longer case

Respectfully,

Chief Public Defender
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 313 — [email protected]

Post by **Sayaka Yukimura** » 14 May 2025, 21:59

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

A decision was reached in the above case on the 14th day of May, 2025.

The court will be granting the defense's request to hear this as a Formal Criminal Trial. We are rescinding the order for discovery due to the transition of this case from bench trial to formal criminal trial. As such both parties will be notified when they are ordered to provide any evidence to the court via a Motion for Discovery.

The court thanks all parties for their patience in this matter, and expects to have the case re-activated as a Formal Criminal Trial sooner than later.

Respectfully,

Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

Post by **Joseph Horton** » 31 Jan 2026, 19:42

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-CM-0002

A Notice of Activation was entered in the above case on 31st of January, 2026.

The case of the State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon is hereby activated by this Court under #26-CM-0002 as a Formal Criminal Trial.

Both the State and Defendant in this case are still awaiting adequate representation. At this time the court will delay the Order for Discovery until adequate representation has been assigned for the Defendant and a State Prosecutor has been assigned to the case and both parties inform the court they are ready to proceed.

In accordance with guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas, this case shall require an in-person trial. Once all pretrial matters have been resolved, a Notice of Scheduling will be issued to arrange an appropriate time for trial.

Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

Post by **Kenzie Long** » 15 Feb 2026, 20:28

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-CM-0002

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 15th day of February, 2026.

I, Kenzie Long, a Defense Attorney of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Swat Nixon, in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Junior Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
432-4584 - [email protected]

Post by **Hope Kant** » 15 Feb 2026, 20:29

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-CM-0002

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 15th day of February, 2026.

I, Hope Kant, a Defense Attorney of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant, Swat Nixon, in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

Post by **Rowin Lawson** » 24 Feb 2026, 06:46

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-CM-0002

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 24th day of February, 2026.

I, Rowin Lawson, a Prosecutor of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

Post by **Joseph Horton** » 28 Feb 2026, 21:52

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-CM-0002

An Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 28th day of February, 2026.

The prosecution is hereby ordered to submit the majority of their evidence, including all evidence collected from the arresting Law Enforcement Agency and submit it to the Court via Motion for Discovery within seven (7) days. If additional time is needed, the prosecution can file a Motion for Continuance.

Additionally, the defense is also hereby ordered to provide all evidence intended for trial via a Motion for Discovery. Any remaining evidence or supplemental submissions by either party must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the scheduled Motions hearing.

Both parties are also ordered to provide an initial witness list to the Court. Any required amendments to the witness list shall be filed through a separate motion ahead of the Motions hearing.

Once evidence has been submitted to the official docket, parties can begin filing motions they intend to be heard at the Motions hearing. Parties should not be filing objections or rebuttals to Motions as this will be addressed during the Motions hearing.

All submissions to the docket must be filed filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the scheduled Motions hearing.

So ordered,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

Post by **Rowin Lawson** » 08 Mar 2026, 23:36

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the Day of Month, Year.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

Exhibit #1: Warrant report - Swat Nixon, 17/JAN/2025
WARRANT REPORT

SUSPECT 1 DETAILS
- Full Name: Swat Nixon
  Telephone Number: 2164573
  Charges:
  GF11 - Grand Theft Auto
  
  VF01 - Evading an Officer
  
  WM05 - Possession of Body Armor as a Felon
  
  SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
  
  SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage
  
  Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :
VEHICLES INVOLVED
DEPUTY DETAILS
- Full Name: Jim Daniel
  Badge Number: 10397
  Callsign: 12-R-24
INCIDENT NARRATIVE
- Date of Incident: 2025-01-17
  Deputies Involved: Mason Ross, PD, DOC
  
  Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to validate the justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
  Noticed a vehicle that was reported as stolen. Started a 10-55 and requested a 10-70. Swat evaded from us before we apprehended him. I cuffed, searched and located ID. When we got to DOC, a bomb was waiting in the lobby. Swat claimed ownership over the bomb and stated there were 3 hostages inside. After negotiations we agreed to give him a Buffalo and we would retrieve the bomb. I gave him his belongings back as he requested. Swat left and got in the Buffalo and left as myself and Officer Laurant Conrad went inside and secured the bomb. Units tried to pursue but were unable to keep up.
  
  Method of Identification
  License
CONFISCATED EVIDENCE DETAILS
- Document the possessions confiscated from the charged suspect.
  Illegal evidence must be documented individually, examples of documented illegal evidence are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
  
  Where possible the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
  
  Location of Evidence Locker: N/A
ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
JIm Daniel

Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Deputy Sheriff Jim Daniel
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Case Information
- Case Number:
  Incident Date: 17/JAN/2025
Witness Information
- Name: Jim Daniel
  Date of Birth: 09/JAN/1998
  Phone Number: 385-3479
  Occupation: Deputy Sheriff 2
Witness Statement
- I was patrolling the city when I ran a plate of a vehicle that was reported as stolen. I requested backup and pulled the vehicle over. I stepped out to speak with the driver and he was at first compliant. He gave me his ID when requested. The ID identified the driver to me as Swat Nixon. I asked Mr. Nixon to step out of the vehicle. Mr. Nixon refused and turned the vehicle on before driving away. My backup units pursued the suspect while I caught up. Mr. Nixon fled to Eclipse Apartments where he exited his vehicle and jumped on a Hakuchou Drag. Myself and other units boxed the motorbike in until Mr. Nixon got off and surrendered to us. I put mechanical restraints on Mr. Nixon to keep his hands secured behind his back while I read him his rights and patted him down. Mr. Nixon stated that he understood his rights. During my search, I located the ID again as well as some body armor. I removed all the items from Mr. Nixon that the DOC would not allow. I then escorted Mr. Nixon to my cruiser and secured him in the back seat. I drove Mr. Nixon to the Department of Corrections while other units secured the vehicles.
  Once I arrived to the DOC, I opened the back door and let Mr. Nixon out so that we could go through the front vestibule to get processed. As we were walking to the door, I heard over the department radio that the DOC staff has located a bomb in the front lobby. I told Mr. Nixon to stop but he quickly walked into the lobby. DOC staff joined me and I asked Mr. Nixon to exit the building multiple times. He refused and stated the bomb belonged to him. I asked him how he got possession of a bomb and Mr. Nixon stated that he had someone drop it off before we arrived. He stated that his accomplice was close by and watching the front parking lot and that this accomplice had the detonator to the bomb.
  I noticed that there was someone else in the front lobby. I tried to speak with them to get them to come out but I received no answer. Mr. Nixon stated that there were three people in the lobby with him and they were his hostage's.
  Mr. Nixon stated that he had demands. He first wanted to be uncuffed. Second, he wanted his belongings back. Third he wanted a high speed vehicle.
  Around this time some PD units including Officer Laurant Conrad and Deputy Sheriff 2 Mason Ross arrived on scene and secured the front parking lot. I informed them of my conversation with Mr. Nixon over Tac radio. Officer Conrad approached the door to take over negotiations.
  Officer Laurant stated that no one was able to retrieve a high speed vehicle. Mr. Nixon requested a Shinobi. Again Officer Laurant stated that no one was high enough rank to get that vehicle. Mr. Nixon agreed to a Police marked Buffalo. The agreement was that he would be uncuffed by Officer Laurant and I would hand over his belongings, including the body armor. Also a Police marked Buffalo would be outside the front door running with the door open. Myself and Officer Laurant would enter the lobby at the same time as Mr. Nixon leaving the lobby. Mr. Nixon would leave while Myself and Officer Laurant retrieve the bomb and secure it in a vehicle outside. Mr. Nixon stated that if he was chased then his accomplice would detonate the bomb.
  We complied with the demands and as soon as the bomb was secured in a armored vehicle then other units attempted to pursue. They were unable to keep up and lost sight of Mr. Nixon.
Witness Affirmation
- I, Jim Daniel, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
  
  Signed,
  
  Jim Daniel
  Deputy Sheriff 2
  Los Santos Sheriff's Department
  
  Date: 24/JAN/2025

Exhibit #3: Witness statement - Deputy Sheriff Mason Ross
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Official Witness Statement
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Case Information
- Case Number: [Case Number]
  Incident Date: [01/JAN/2000]
Witness Information
- Name: [Mason Ross]
  Date of Birth: [07/09/1991]
  Phone Number: [401-8684]
  Occupation: [Deputy Sheriff III]
Witness Statement
- [
  My involvement in this incident began at the Department of Corrections when Deputy Jim Daniels arrived at the facility with Swat Nixon in custody. After Deputy Daniels let Nixon out of the cruiser, I saw him quickly run inside the building. Upon entering the lobby, Nixon must have noticed a bag with a note suggesting it contained an explosive device.
  
  Nixon immediately “took charge” of the situation, attempting to negotiate his own release (from the arrest GF11 VF01 WM05). Throughout the incident, he claimed to have spotters monitoring the area, a remote detonator, and threatened to detonate the device if his demands weren’t met.
  
  I radioed PD to check if there was any EOD personnel on duty. Fortunately, a firefighter who is also a METRO negotiator clocked in at PD and took over the situation. The negotiator successfully handled the matter by letting Swat walk free and letting us handle the bag, which was empty. We tried looking at CCTV but so much time had passed we could not rewind enough time to see who placed the bag, but Mr Nixon claim he had it planted
  
  ]
Witness Affirmation
- I, [Mason rossE], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
  
  Signed,
  
  Deputy Sheriff III Mason Ross
  [email protected]
  [/b]
  Date: [25/JAN/2024]

Exhibit #4: Arrest report - Swat Nixon, 20/JAN/2025
Los Santos Police Department
ARREST REPORT
"TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

MUGSHOT
- SUSPECT DETAILS
  
  Full Name: SWAT NIXON
  Phone Number: 2164573
  Licenses Suspended: Yes
  Officers Involved:
  
  Police Detective III Zoey Deul
  
  Police Cadet Robin Long
  
  Assistant Chief Dezzy Bala
  
  SD Deputy Sheriff II Jim Daniel
  
  SD Deputy Sheriff III Mason Ross
  
  Charges:
  
  VF01 - Evading an Officer
  
  WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
  
  Attempted SF02 - Murder of a Gov. Employee
  
  INCIDENT NARRATIVE
  
  Incident Date: 20/JAN/2025
  
  Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
  
  21-S-20 arrived at city impound as Officer Bala was already at the location dealing with an impound request from the detained Mr Nixon.
  Mr Nixon began open firing at Officer Bala using an unlicensed class 1 firearm (Pistol .50) whilst simultaneously trying to evade on a motorbike. We saw this happen, shot and detained Mr Nixon. Mr Nixon was also wanted for several other charges linked here.
  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS
  
  Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
  Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.
  
  Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
  
  Illegal Possessions:
  Exhibit A: Pistol .50
  
  Legal Possessions:
  Exhibit A: clothing
  Exhibit B: GPS
  Exhibit C: Empty water
  Exhibit D: screwdriver
  Exhibit E: water
  Exhibit F: lockpicks x 2
  Exhibit G: Radio
  Exhibit H: Knife
  
  Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

Post by **Joseph Horton** » 15 Mar 2026, 19:42

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

Prosecution and defense counsel,

Defense, you will have seven (7) days to submit any Motions before scheduling for the Motions hearing will begin.

If you do not have any Motions to submit, please notify the Court as soon as possible.

Respectfully,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

Post by **Hope Kant** » 23 Mar 2026, 23:21

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-CM-0002

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 23rd day of March, 2026.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

Reasoning: The defense is in plea agreement talks with the prosecution. We would like additional time to sort things out. Three days should be sufficient.

Chief Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

Post by **Joseph Horton** » 24 Mar 2026, 08:43

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

COURT DECISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-CM-0002

A decision was reached in the above case on the 24th day of March, 2026.

The Court will accept the three-day Motion for Continuance.

Please provide an update by the end of the day on the 27th of March.

So Ordered,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

Post by **Joseph Horton** » 06 Apr 2026, 21:51

Document 1 | Filed 05/APR/2026 | Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF SAN ANDREAS

Docket Number:
#26-CM-0002
Date Filed:
22/MAR/2026
Violations:
SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
State of San Andreas

v.

Swat Nixon

PLEA AGREEMENT

Pursuant to the case of State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon; Attorney General Rowin Lawson, Defense Attorney Hope Kant, and the defendant, Swat Nixon, have entered into agreement, the terms of which are as follows;
1. Current Charges
  1. GF21 - Prison Break
  2. GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer
2. Former Charges
  The state shall pursue the current charges listed above, in place of the original charges listed below:
  1. SF01 - Domestic Terrorism
3. General Provisions
  - The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Current Charges outlined in Section I. The State waives the right to pursue the Former Charges outlined in Section II in regards to this particular incident. The defendant will not be required to pay court fees or associated appeal fees.
4. Waiver of Rights
  - It is CRITICAL that you read this section of the plea agreement thoroughly. By signing this document, the defendant agrees to surrender certain rights, notably; the defendant may not further appeal charges agreed to within this plea bargain.
    
    This agreement may not be terminated at the discretion of a defendant, the defendant's counsel, nor the prosecution; it may only be terminated by the presiding judge under strict guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court of San Andreas.
    
    By signing this document, the defendant is pleading guilty to the charges outlined in Section I and these charges may not be challenged at a later date.
Rowin Lawson
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed:05/APR/2026

Hope Kant
Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: 5/APR/2026

Swat Nixon
Defendant
Date Signed: 6/APR/2026

Joseph Horton
Honorable Joseph Horton
San Andreas Judicial Branch
Date Signed: 06/APR/2026

Post by **Joseph Horton** » 06 Apr 2026, 21:53

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Swat Nixon
#26-CM-0002

A decision was reached in the above case on the 6th day of April, 2026.

A Plea Agreement was filed by the Prosecution. It was signed by the defendant and their counsel, where applicable. After review, the courts have determined the presented plea to be an acceptable case outcome. As a judge has now signed the agreement, it is considered valid by the courts.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

On the count of GF21 - Prison Break, I find the defendant, Swat Nixon, guilty.
On the count of GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer, I find the defendant, Swat Nixon, guilty.
On the count of SF09 - False Imprisonment of a Hostage, I find the defendant, Swat Nixon, guilty.

So ordered,

Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

SAJB Awards

LSEMS Awards

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards

SAJB Awards