#26-BT-0015 State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid

[Dylan Deltoid]

Defendant Name: Dylan Deltoid
Defendant Phone: 298-5729
(( Defendant Discord: kylandent ))
(( Defendant Timezone: UTC ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self-Representation

Charging Department: Sherrif Department

Date & Time of Incident(s): 02/FEB/2026 22:24
Charge(s):

• GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
  WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
  WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications

Narrative:
i was wrongly charged.

---

I, Dylan Deltoid, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid
#26-BT-0015

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 4th day of February, 2026.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

Prior to scheduling, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid
#26-BT-0015

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 4th day of February, 2026.

The case of State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

The Superior Court Bench Trial system runs off of defendant responsiveness. If defendants are interacting with the court or their attorney, a Notice to Schedule will be posted with all parties being able note their availability. A Judge will then pick the most suitable time for trial. Once a trial has been scheduled, the court will consider most submissions to be final.

The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defense or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue

Respectfully,


Associate Justice
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid
#26-BT-0015

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 28th day of February, 2026.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1 Arrest Report

  

  ARREST REPORT
  

  MUGSHOT

  SUSPECT 1 DETAILS

  • 
    
    
    Full Name: Dylan Deltoid
    Telephone Number: 2985729
    Licenses Suspended: No
    Charges:
    • GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
    • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
    • WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications
    
    
    Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :

  
  
  VEHICLES INVOLVED

  
  
  DEPUTY DETAILS

  • Full Name: Gina Willow
    Badge Number: 23050
    Callsign: DL

  
  
  INCIDENT DETAILS

  • Date of Arrest: 2026-02-02
    Deputies Involved: Gina Willow, Alexander Olsson, Charlie Ross
    
    Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
    • Myself and Olsson were in a pursuit with other SD deputies, when Dylan followed the pursuit in a kamacho for around 3,4 minutes. we issued 2-3 verbal commands to leave, and even pulled up alongside him, and ordered him clearly to leave the pursuit line and to not follow our vehicle. He followed us for another 60 seconds or so, so we pulled them over, asked them to exit the vehicle and arrested them for failure to comply. A pistol .50 and silencer were found in the glovebox of his vehicle.

  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS

  • Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station
    Exhibit A: Pistol.50
    Exhibit B: Supressor
    
    Photo of the evidence in the locker (if applicable)

    

    ---

  ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
  Gina Willow
  

  ---

  

• Exhibit #2 Witness Statement Deputy Willow

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: #26-BT-0015
    Incident Date: 02/FEB/2026

  Witness Information

  • Name: Gina Willow
    Date of Birth: 16/JUN/1999
    Phone Number: 5312187
    Occupation: Sheriff's Deputy

  Witness Statement

  • Myself and Lieutenant Olsson were in an active pursuit on this date, when a kamacho was following the pursuit line for an extended amount of time. I backed away towards the Kamacho, and issued verbal commands using the megaphone for the Kamacho to leave the pursuit line.
    
    The kamacho continued to follow, so once again we issued verbal commands, and even pulled up alongside the Kamacho and verbally requested that the kamacho leaves the pursuit line. The driver acknowledged our request, but continued following the pursuit line. At this stage, they were obstructing justice by actively getting in the way of an ongoing pursuit, so we initiated a traffic stop on the vehicle, ordering the driver to exit, and arrested them for Failure to Comply, this charge was opted for as failing to comply with our lawful order to leave the pursuit line seemed more fitting to this specific scenario than obstruction of justice.
    
    When the driver exited and complied, I personally searched the vehicle, as it was going to be impounded. This is when the Pistol .50 was found inside the glovebox with a silencer attached to it, so the class 1 charge, and modifications charge was added. Myself and Lieutenant Olsson both had bodycams on during this situation that can be reviewed. (( This will need to be /do's as I do not have physical footage from the day ))

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Gina Willow, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    Gina Willow
    Deputy Sheriff Bonus II
    Los Santos Sheriff's Department
    
    Date: 25/FEB/2026

  

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid
#26-BT-0015

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 1st day of March, 2026.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  The Prosecution has filled its availability.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Rowin Lawson
  Deputy Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  451-9939 - [email protected]

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF TRIAL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid
#26-BT-0015

A trial date was set on the above case on the 10th day of March, 2026.

In accordance with the availability reported by parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place following #26-BT-0017 State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid at approximately 20:00 PM on 15th day of March, 2026 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,


Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]

[Adam Patrone]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. Dylan Deltoid
#26-BT-0017

A decision was reached in the above case on the 15th day of March, 2026.

---

Facts

---

• Police were engaged in a pursuit when they spotted the defendant
• The defendant was verbally warned not to follow the pursuit
• The defendant continued to follow and was subsequently arrested.
• Officers searched the vehicle and found an illegal firearm and modifications.

---

Arguments From Either Side

---

The prosecution argues that the defendant was given ample opportunity to stop following but did not, thereby engaging in an active pursuit. They argue that such a pursuit is an ongoing investigation, and that the defendant therefore inserted themselves and refused to stop following when told to.

The defense argues that the law requires refusal of an officer's initial orders to constitute a failure to comply, which they never documented. They believe traveling on roadways as they did was lawful and proper, and the evidence shown does not meet the court's standard for the charge of GM10 - Failure to Comply.

---

Verdict

---

The court finds that, while the defendant did indeed follow an active police pursuit for a period of time. The officer's attempts to ask the defendant multiple times, both verbally and with a megaphone, were within the full scope of issuing a lawful order. Furthermore, the court finds the order is deemed lawful pursuant to the penal code definition of VC06 - Following or Impeding Emergency Response.

The argument was made that the refusal of this order may not have been made verbally. The defendant continued following the officers during the pursuit despite warnings. In accordance with officer safety and the Penal Code, this would allow a reasonable person to interpret this as a failure to comply. The officers made multiple "good faith" attempts to warn the defendant. The subsequent traffic stop and search incident were conducted in accordance with the arrest.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:

• On the count of GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify, I find the defendant, Dylan Deltoid, guilty.
• On the count of WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm, I find the defendant, Dylan Deltoid, guilty.
• On the count of WM03 - Criminal Use of Weapon Modifications, I find the defendant, Dylan Deltoid, guilty.

So Ordered,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
298-3863 - [email protected]