#25-BT-0126 State of San Andreas v. David Brusky

[Daniel Carmello]

Defendant Name: David Brusky
Defendant Phone: 3507263
(( Defendant Discord: grandinaire ))
(( Defendant Timezone: N/A ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Private Defense Attorney

Charging Department: LSPD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 11/OCT/2025
Charge(s):

• GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify

Narrative:
We believe my client was wrongfully arrested.

---

I, Daniel Carmello, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 16th day of October, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense. The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

[Joseph Horton]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky
#25-BT-0126

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 16th day of October, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. David Brusky is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
274-6959 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky
#25-BT-0126

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 14th of November, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest report - David Brusky

  

  

  Los Santos Police Department ARREST REPORT "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"

  
  

  ---

  • ARREST DETAILS
    • Arresting Officer: Tyrone Turner
      Callsign: 21-L-29
      
      Date of Arrest: 12/OCT/2025
      Officers Involved:
      • Assistant Chief Phillipe Sanchez
      • Deputy Chief Elizabeth Sanchez
      • Police Lieutenant I Jamie Lockwood
      • Police Sergeant II Carl Jacobs
      Narrative: Explain what happened in detail, provide sufficient detail to justify the charges. Video and image evidence can be provided. Specifically state why each charge listed was placed.
      
      Elizabeth Sanchez reported that her Neon was being lockpicked at Mission Row. I responded to the area to investigate. Upon arrival, I observed a black Dubsta occupied by three individuals. One male was crouched on top of the vehicle, appearing to watch the garage area closely.
      I conducted a U-turn and initiated a traffic stop on the Dubsta. After stopping the vehicle, I exited my cruiser and approached the driver, requesting his driver’s license. He complied and provided identification. I then asked the front passenger for his license, but he refused to identify himself.
      After asking the front passenger approximately five times to provide identification and receiving continued refusal, I instructed him to step out of the vehicle. I made one final request for his ID, warning him that failure to comply would result in further action. Despite this, he refused again. After giving multiple opportunities to comply, I placed the suspect in handcuffs, read him his Miranda rights, and detained him for failure to identify.
      Additional officers arrived on scene and we conducted an investigation to determine whether the individuals were involved in the reported lockpicking incident. After the investigation, the other individuals were released as no direct involvement was determined. The non-compliant suspect was transported to Mission Row for processing and to serve his sentence.

  ---

  • MUGSHOT
    SUSPECT #1 DETAILS
    • 
      Full Name: David Brusky
      Phone Number: 3507263
      License(s) Suspended: Driver Trucker Firearms Pilot
      Charge(s):
      • GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
      • GC06 - Possession of Cannabis
      Evidence: Include a photo of the evidence items; it is optional to document the items in writing when including a photo. Always provide the serial number of any seized firearm. Mark where the possessions were stored.
      
      Evidence Description and/or Photo

      Exhibit A:
      
      Evidence Location: Mission Row Station Vinewood Police Headquarters Department of Corrections

  

• Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Officer Tyrone Turner

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Incident Date: 11/OCT/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Tyrone Turner
    Date of Birth: 01/JAN/2000
    Phone Number: 5172653
    Occupation: Police Officer II, Los Santos Police Department

  Witness Statement

  • So what happened was Elizabeth Sanchezs car was being lockpicked at side garage at Mission Row station as I was already at Mission row I responded quickly and went up there as I was going I witnessed a 3x occupied Black Dubsta and a guy on top of the car crouching and watching the side garage and as soon as they saw me the guy quickly got in the car and drove off and then I pulled them over.
    
    While they were being pulled over I asked for the driver license and he showed me then I asked for the passenger License he refused to show while I asked him 10 more times politely and gently he was being rude to me he still refused and remember this even his friends were telling him to show his License then I asked him to step out then he was asked again multiple times to show licnese I gave him the chance of the world to just show me the license and not arrest him and he was still refusing so I put him in cuffs and had to get his License by force.
    
    then all of the passengers were asked to step out for investigation and they all complied, we had CCTV footage and the person who lockpicked the car was in similar outfit.
    
    The Officers who were with me were all supervisor and Staff team they told him and me that I had followed everything by the book and the rules and there was nothing wrong (as he asked for supervisor).
    
    
    I believe I have nothing else to add except that I followed everything by the rules.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Tyrone Turner, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Tyrone Turner
    Police Officer II
    Los Santos Police Department
    
    Date: 02/NOV/2025

  

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  495-1265 — [email protected]

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a THIRD AND FINAL notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  495-1265 — [email protected]

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  With discussion from the defendant, I will be restarting the timer for contact and activity on the docket for the case. We advise the defendant to reach out to a public defense attorney provided by the San Andreas Judicial Branch.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  495-1265 — [email protected]

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant to notify the court of any counsel changes. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Please note there is the possibility of a trial happening if defendants show up to City Hall and both a judge and defense attorney are available.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  495-1265 — [email protected]

[Luna McMillan]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 17th of January, 2026.

I, Luna McMillan, a Public Defense Attorney with the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the Defendant(s), David Brusky in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.



Luna McMillan
Public Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
463-9315 — [email protected][/list]

[Rowin Lawson]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky
25-BT-#0126

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 21st day of January, 2026.

I, Rowin Lawson, a Prosecutor of the San Andreas Judicial Branch, will be representing the State of San Andreas in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.

Rowin Lawson
Deputy Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
451-9939 - [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky
#26-BT-0126

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on 22nd day of January, 2026.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,


Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 - [email protected]

[Audrey Hartwell]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky

A Notification of Counsel was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2026.

I, Audrey Hartwell, a Private Defense Attorney with Rockford Law, will be representing the Defendant(s), Name in the underlying case.

I will be taking the responsibility of Primary Counsel/Co-Counsel and will await further instruction from the Presiding Judge.



Managing Partner
Rockford Law
377-1669 — [email protected]

[Audrey Hartwell]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky
#25-BT-0126

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 25th of January, 2026.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Change of Council
  • Detailed Explanation: I have been handed this case at request of Hope Kant. I would appreciate a continuance so I can familiarise myself with this case, and meet with the Defendant to understand the situation further.

Managing Partner
Rockford Capital
377-1669 — [email protected]

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Defense,
  
  The Court will approve and allow the motion for continuance for a period of five (5) days considering the time that has elapsed from the submission of the motion.
  
  If additional time is needed, please don’t hesitate to file another motion for continuance.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  495-1265 — [email protected]

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Cale Makar
#25-BT-0137

An attempt to schedule was made and recorded by the court on the 8th day of February, 2026.

All parties in this case are encouraged to complete the following Scheduling Tool in an attempt to schedule a trial on the above case. When the scheduling tool has been completed by either party, please post on the docket stating as such.

In the event all parties have overlapping availability the Presiding Judge will determine the best date and time to have a trial take place and post a Notice of Trial informing all of the upcoming proceeding.

In the event some or all parties do not have overlapping availability, the Presiding Judge will continue to attempt to schedule the proceeding or seek alternative avenues to conclude the case.

If either party has the intentions of calling a witness to the stand during the proceeding they must inform the court by filing a Witness List at the time of filing their availability. If no Witness List is filed before the Notice of Trial is filed you will be unable to call a witness during the proceeding.


Respectfully,

Magistrate Judge
Director of Public Notary
San Andreas Judicial Branch
495-1265 — [email protected]

[Audrey Hartwell]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Brusky
#25-BT-0126

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 9th of February, 2026.

The Defendant, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Lack of Response
  • Detailed Explanation: I deeply apologise to the court for this motion for continuance. I have still been unable to get contact with the defendant, with my Email being left in my outbox for a week. I would like to request an additional motion for continuance so I can attempt another avenue of contact with the defendant.

Managing Partner
Rockford Law
377-1669 — [email protected]

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Defense,
  
  The Court will approve and allow the motion for continuance for a period of two (2) days considering the time that has elapsed for this case. The Defendant has had multiple opportunities to find and communicate with counsel.
  
  Should the Defense not be able to get in contact with the defendant after the continuance the case will be dismissed.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  495-1265 — [email protected]

[Audrey Hartwell]

Rockford Capital Partners Rockford Law

---

Good Afternoon to all those involved in this case,

It's with a heavy heart that David Brusky has expressed his intention to dismiss this case as he is no longer a citizen within Los Santos
((David has left the server and isn't intending on coming back. You can dismiss this))

Thanks,
Managing Partner Audrey Hartwell

---

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Prosecution,
  
  The Court acknowledges the defense wish to dismiss the case. Do you have any objections to the following motion?
  
  Respectfully,
  
  Magistrate Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  495-1265 — [email protected]

[Clara Lopez]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

The State of San Andreas v. David Brusky
#26-BT-0126

A decision was reached in the above case on the 1st day of March, 2026.

Since the Defense has advised the Court the defendant no longer wants to purse his case, the charges will remain on his record.

So Ordered,

Magistrate Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
495-1265 — [email protected]