#25-BT-0058 State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

Locked
OliviaDevalera
Posts: 8
Joined: 01 Oct 2024, 16:22
ECRP Forum Name: Livvy
Discord:

#25-BT-0058 State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

Post by OliviaDevalera »

Image
Image
Defendant Name: Olivia DeValera
Defendant Phone: 268-1403
(( Defendant Discord: livviah ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Public Defender
Image
Charging Department: LSPD
Image
Date & Time of Incident(s): 09/02/2025 Approx 11:15am UTC
Charge(s):
  • Evading, possesion of class 1 firearm, failure to comply, possesion of a controlled substance while armed, public endangerment and possesion of a schedule III controlled substance
Narrative:


I wish to contest being charged twice for the possession of a controlled substance and also possesion of a controlled substance while armed, I feel as though this charge has been stacked upon me as I am alleged to be in possesion of a fire arm then why not just charge me with the possesion of a controlled substance while armed, even then I was not physically armed with the .50 as it was not found on my person.
I also wish to contest the charge of failure to comply as I feel that would be covered under the evading part of the charges.
I also feel that although I did evade, I want to also contest the charge of public endangerment as I did not endanger any members of the public as it was a quiet time of the day (about 5am) and there was no vehicles on the road apart from 1 which I came across. I did not recklessly drive through any oncoming traffic or public sidewalks, and the chase mostly led through the highways of the city.



I, Olivia DeValera, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))
Image
Finlay Mcculloch
Posts: 302
Joined: 29 Apr 2020, 21:55
ECRP Forum Name: Dangerous
Discord:

SAJB Awards

LSEMS Awards

Re: State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

Post by Finlay Mcculloch »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF RECEIPT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 16th day of February, 2025.


The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the court system runs on a first-come, first-served basis and will only activate cases out of order for special circumstances.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.

Image
Court Clerk
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 274-4300 - [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3562
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #25-BT-0058 State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera
#25-BT-0058

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 28th day of April, 2025.


The case of State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 30 days or file a Motion for Continuance.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes set precedence or desire a formal criminal trial, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
Terence Williams
Posts: 4094
Joined: 26 May 2023, 19:02
ECRP Forum Name:
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0058 State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

Post by Terence Williams »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera
#25-BT-0058

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 11th of May, 2025.


The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;


  • Exhibit #1: Arrest report - Olivia DeValera, 09/FEB/2025
    Image
    Image

    Los Santos Police Department

    ARREST REPORT
    "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE"


    MUGSHOT
    • SUSPECT DETAILS
      • Full Name: Olivia Devalera
        Phone Number: 2681403
        Licenses Suspended: Yes
        Officers Involved:
        • Police Detective I Sebastian Knight
        • Police Officer III Ashley Flores
        Charges:
        • VF01 - Evading an Officer
        • GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify
        • WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm
        • DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed
        • VF04 - Felony Public Endangerment
        • DM03 - Possession of a Schedule III Controlled Substance
      INCIDENT NARRATIVE
      • Incident Date: 09/FEB/2025

        Explain what happened, sufficient detail must be given to justify the placed charges, videos could be provided.
        • While driving on palamino Fwy Detective Knight witnessed a vehicle stopping by a dead body and another person out of the vehicle leaning on the deadbody (AKA the suspect), Detective Knight decided to make a U-turn and check the situation. Once started U-turning the suspect got in their vehicle and drove through the grass cutting from a side to another through the highway. Detective Knight then followed them with Lights and sirens in order to pull them over.
          Detective Knight than started a traffic stop on the suspect, Detective Knight started by identifying the suspect which they complied with, but then Detective Knight asked the suspect to step out of the vehicle informing them that they are part of an investigation relating to the dead body. The suspect did not comply at all and refused to step out of the vehicle after multiple attempts. Detective Knight stated again that he is lawfully requesting the suspect to step out of the vehicle as part of their detainment regarding the dead body on the road. The suspect refused again for the 5th time. Detective Knight escalated the force to hold a tazer on them and start to call for backup units. At that moment the suspect started to evade.
          During the evasion the suspect went on high rates of speed on incorrect lane of travel and cutting through side walks to finally have a major traffic collision on the middle part on elgin avenue. The suspect from there was arrested and processed at DOC.
      EVIDENCE DETAILS
      • Document the possessions confiscated from the arrested suspect.
        Possessions are to be documented individually, examples of documented illegal possessions are "Pistol .50" or "12 grams of Cocaine". Legal possessions that can be categorized may be grouped, eg. "Clothing" to describe all clothing items. Body camera footage/pictures may be attached as an evidence exhibit.

        Where possible, the serial number of each firearm seized as evidence should be noted.
        • Illegal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: .50
          Exhibit B: Marijuana
          Exhibit C: Sulfiric Acid
          Exhibit D: Sodium
          Exhibit E: Powdered Lime


          Legal Possessions:
          Exhibit A: Radio
          Exhibit B: Clothing

          Photograph of Possessions (MANDATORY)
          Image
    Image
  • Exhibit #2: Witness statement - Police Detective Sebastian Knight
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 09/FEB/2025
    Witness Information
    • Name: Sebastian Knight
      Date of Birth: 17/Apr/1985
      Phone Number: 666-3629
      Occupation: Detective I, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • I, Detective Knight, While driving on palamino Fwy witnessed a vehicle stopping by a dead body and another person out of the vehicle leaning on the deadbody, I decided to make a U-turn and check the situation. Once started U-turning the suspect got in their vehicle and drove through the grass cutting from a side to another through the highway. I then followed them with Lights and sirens in order to pull them over.
      I than started a traffic stop on the suspect, I started by identifying the suspect which they complied with, but then Detective Knight asked the suspect to step out of the vehicle informing them that they are part of an investigation relating to the dead body. The suspect did not comply at all and refused to step out of the vehicle after multiple attempts. I stated again that I am lawfully requesting the suspect to step out of the vehicle as part of their detainment due an investigation relating to the dead body on the road. The suspect refused again for the 5th time.
      I escalated the force to hold a tazer in my hands and start to call for backup units. At that moment the suspect started to evade.
      During the evasion the suspect went on high rates of speed on incorrect lane of travel and cutting through side walks to finally have a major traffic collision on the middle part on elgin avenue. The suspect from there was arrested and processed at DOC.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Sebastian Knight, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,

      Sebastian Knight
      Police Detectives I Sebastian Knight
      Vice Unit, Detective Bureau
      Los Santos Police Department
      [/b]
      Date: 11/FEB/2025
    Image
  • Exhibit #3: Witness statement - Police Officer Ashley Flores
    Image

    San Andreas Judicial Branch
    Official Witness Statement
    "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"
    Case Information
    • Incident Date: 09/FEB/2025
    Witness Information
    • Name: Ashley Flores
      Date of Birth: 27/JUL/2000
      Phone Number: 220-7197
      Occupation: POIII, Los Santos Police Department
    Witness Statement
    • I would like to state that in the case of Ms. Devalera, I did not place her charges and that I only handled the arrest and evidence along with Detective Knight. I searched Ms. Devalera's car on scene after she had evaded driving through the city at speeds higher than most cruisers could reach which I would consider dangerous and reckless. In Ms. Devalera's car, I found a loaded pistol in the glovebox and in her trunk I found a bag containing 38 Marijuana plants and many more ingredients for other drugs including sulfuric acid, powdered lime and sodium. Once Ms. Devalera was in the cruiser to be transported she seemed very agitated and impatient. Ms. Devalera was shouting at not only me but Detective Knight also. Ms. Devalera was compliant but very aggressive throughout this arrest.
    Witness Affirmation
    • I, Ashley Flores, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))

      Signed,
      Image
      Ashley Flores
      POIII
      Los Santos Police Department

      Date: 10/FEB/2025
    Image

Image
Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3562
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #25-BT-0058 State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTICE OF TRIAL


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera
#25-BT-0058

A trial date was set on the above case on 16th of May, 2025.


In accordance with the availability reported by both parties in response to the Notice of Scheduling, this trial shall take place at 09:30 PM on 31st of May, 2025 at Rockford Hills City Hall, Carcer Way, Metro Los Santos, SA.

Both parties are ordered to be present in the Judges Chambers no later than 15 minutes prior to the above listed date for pretrial arrangements. If complications occur that must result in a delay or cancellation of the trial, you are ordered to inform the court no later than 12 hours prior to the above listed date.


So ordered,

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
Piper Johnson
Posts: 260
Joined: 10 Aug 2024, 23:56
ECRP Forum Name: Piper Johnson
Discord:

SAJB Awards

Re: #25-BT-0058 State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

Post by Piper Johnson »

Image



San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera
#25-BT-0058

A Notification of Change in Counsel was filed in the above case on the 01/JUN/2025


Please be advised that effective immediately, Piper Johnson will assume the role of Primary Counsel in the above-referenced matter. All future correspondence, filings, and communications should be directed to their attention.

Should you have any questions or require clarification, please do not hesitate to reach out.


Image
Lead Defense Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 480-1442 — [email protected]
Image
Image
User avatar
Sayaka Yukimura
Correctional Officer
Posts: 3562
Joined: 21 Jun 2021, 01:22
ECRP Forum Name: Iriael
Discord: Iriael

LSPD Awards for Service

SASG Awards

LSSD Awards

SAJB Awards

SADOC Awards

Re: #25-BT-0058 State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera

Post by Sayaka Yukimura »

Image


San Andreas Judicial Branch

Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

ISSUANCE OF VERDICT


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. Olivia DeValera
#25-CM-0058

A decision was reached in the above case on the 31st day of May, 2025.


The case brought to the court today has no dispute on how the situation started. The defendant, Ms. Olivia DeValera was pulled over, identified by police, and then evaded when stepped out of the vehicle. There is a dispute on what precisely happened during the ensuing pursuit, specifically with regards to whether the defendant's actions meet the standard of VF04, namely
State Government wrote: putting a major risk to public safety through unsafe operation of a motor vehicle.
While the actions shown through evidence of the defendant were reckless, the court finds that they do not meet the mentioned threshold for VF04.

Defense has brought up the Lesser Included Offense Doctrine, with regards to the charges of GM10 and DM03, as they argue that they stem from the same incident and the same pieces of evidence. While the prosecution notes that with DM03 the "greater" charge is also a misdemeanor, the doctrine is not limited to just felonies and is applicable to all charges. The defendant has constructive possession of their firearm in the glovebox without the relevant licensing, as noted in the charge of WM02. Moreover, the defendant also has constructive possession of the controlled substances in their car's trunk at the same time. However, the court finds that the narcotics evidence used to justify the charge of DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed cannot also be used to justify the charge of DM03 - Possession of a Schedule III Controlled Substance.

It is with the above considerations that I issue the following verdict:
  • On the count of VF01 - Evading an Officer, I find the defendant, Olivia DeValera, guilty.
  • On the count of VF04 - Felony Public Endangerment, I find the defendant, Olivia DeValera, not guilty.
  • On the count of DM03 - Possession of a Schedule III Controlled Substance, I find the defendant, Olivia DeValera, not guilty.
  • On the count of DM04 - Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed, I find the defendant, Olivia DeValera, guilty.
  • On the count of WM02 - Possession of a Class 1 Firearm, I find the defendant, Olivia DeValera, guilty.
  • On the count of GM10 - Failure to Comply / Identify, I find the defendant, Olivia DeValera, not guilty.


The defendant should make their way to City Hall at their earliest convenience to have the change to their record noted as well as the payment of $23,500 returned to them for fines, time, and other expenses/inconveniences incurred from the contested charges.

ImageImage
Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]
Image
Image
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “SAJB - Archived Bench Trials”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest