#25-BT-0009 State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

[David Vespucci]

Defendant Name: David Vespucci
Defendant Phone: 593-1338
(( Defendant Discord: .kujima ))
(( Defendant Timezone: GMT ))
Type of Representation (Pick one): Self-Representation

Charging Department: LSSD

Date & Time of Incident(s): 07/01/2025
Charge(s):

• GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer

Narrative:
I was unlawfully arrested.

---

I, David Vespucci, hereby affirm that all information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and understand that knowingly providing false information could result in additional charges and/or fines. (( I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means. ))

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF RECEIPT

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

The court has hereby received and acknowledged the above case on the 8th day of January, 2025.

The Superior Court of San Andreas has received your filing and the case is now pending activation. Be advised that the bench trial court system operates off a time-slot scheduling system. Please look out for notifications from either the courts or your attorney in regards to scheduling your bench trial.

During this time, the defendant is encouraged to reach out to a licensed defense attorney in order to prepare a proper defense, otherwise, a court-appointed attorney will be assigned to the case upon its activation.

The defendant is further encouraged to speak with an authorized individual at Rockford Hills City Hall, Mission Row Police Station, or Paleto Bay Sheriff's Office for official clarification on the specific charges received and their respective date and times, as once the case has been activated, any omitted charges will be considered abandoned and unable to be disputed within this case.


Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

NOTICE OF ACTIVATION & ORDER FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

A Notice of Activation & Order for Discovery was entered in the above case on the 8th day of January, 2025.

The case of State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci is hereby activated and opened by this Court.

Be advised that the bench-trial court system runs on a weekly time-slot system. The prosecution and defense are hereby ordered to provide their evidence to the Court via Motion for Discovery within the next 7 days.

If at any point in time the defendant or prosecution wishes to dispute more than just misdemeanor charges or desires a more in-depth examination of the case, they are welcome to file a Motion for a Change in Venue.


Superior Court Justice
Branch Administrator
San Andreas Judicial Branch
505-9925 — [email protected]

[Larin Tai]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 13th of January, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #1: Arrest Report: David Vespucci (07/JAN/2025)

  

  ARREST REPORT
  

  MUGSHOT

  SUSPECT 1 DETAILS

  • 
    
    
    Full Name: David Vespucci
    Telephone Number: 5931338
    Licenses Suspended: No
    Charges:
    • GM12 - Giving False Information to a Police Officer
    • VC03 - Speeding 3rd Degree
    
    
    Additional Details (Suspect's vehicle, etc.) :

  
  
  VEHICLES INVOLVED

  
  
  DEPUTY DETAILS

  • Full Name: Nacho Navarro
    Badge Number: 28313
    Callsign: 3-X-27

  
  
  INCIDENT DETAILS

  • Date of Arrest: 2025-01-07
    Deputies Involved: Nacho Navarro, Hugo Hernandez, Leif Helgarson
    
    Provide details of the incident leading up to the arrest
    • After leaving the location where I was conducting a stake-out, I ran onto the cemetery back towards my cruiser which I had parked out of sight behind the church. I noticed a Paragon R sitting in the middle of the cemetery with a person inside, who started shouting at me and reversing towards me. Seeing I just left my observation post, and didn't expect to see anyone there, I didn't feel like small talk and ran back into my cruiser and headed back to the county. The Paragon initiated pursuit and was tailing me, even as I sped up well above the speed limit he was still chasing me going well over 195 km/h. I asked for back-up units to get him off my tail, they pulled him over and I changed cruisers.
      
      He stated I was inside his Paragon R to Hugo and that I stole it, I was never near his car and had only seen the car as I jumped to wall to get to my cruiser, which he was already inside off. He then kept insisting I stole his car and asked for my badge number. Badge number was given.

  
  EVIDENCE DETAILS

  • Location of Evidence Locker: Sandy Station
    Exhibit A: Legal items, mask + radio.

  
  
  ARRESTING DEPUTY SIGNATURE
  
  

  ---

  

• Exhibit #2: Witness Statement: Deputy Hernandez

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [N/A]
    Incident Date: [07/JAN/2025]

  Witness Information

  • Name: [Hugo Hernandez]
    Date of Birth: [07/DEC/2000]
    Phone Number: [255-1434]
    Occupation: [LSSD]

  Witness Statement

  • [Davids arrest was something that was quite sudden and out of the blue from my perspective. It started off when Deputy Navarro made a callout over radio stating he was being chased by a paragon down route 68. I did what every other unit would do and responded accordingly. I managed to pull over the paragon, and initiating a 10-55 in the process. I spoke to Mr Vespucci who was the only one occupying the vehicle at the time, and he stated something along the lines of "Deputy Navarro stole my car, so I am following him". I thought this was rather bizzare so I reached out to Nacho on the radio and he came to the traffic stop to assist. Due to David stating to myself multple times that Nacho had stolen Davids paragon, Nacho arrested David for providing false infomation as clearly Nacho knew this was not true in the slightest. Per officer testimony, I let Nacho go ahead with the arrest based on what he had seen, resulting in the rest of the units clearing out.
    
    In terms of the stakeout prior to the situation described above, I have no knowledge of what occurred. My best guess is that this was GND related surveillance which even I don't have access to so I have nothing to comment on this.]

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, [Hugo Hernandez], affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    [Hugo Hernandez]
    [Investigator II]
    [Los Santos County Sheriffs Department]
    
    Date: [07/JAN/2025]

  

Larin Tai
Prosecuting Attorney
San Andreas Judicial Branch
244-5389 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

A Motion for Continuance was filed in the above case on the 15th of January, 2025.

The State of San Andreas/Defendant, name, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Continuance, and the reasoning for request is as follows;

• Reasoning: Additional evidence to be filed
  • Detailed Explanation: The Prosecution is still in the process of retrieving bodycam footage from the Los Santos Sheriff's Department, and request an additional three (3) days for this purpose.

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[David Vespucci]

Sure.

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 23rd of January, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #3: Wtiness statement - Deputy Sheriff Nacho Navarro

  

  

  
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  Official Witness Statement
  "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

  Case Information

  • Case Number: [Case Number]
    Incident Date: 07/JAN/2025

  Witness Information

  • Name: Nacho Navarro
    Date of Birth: 04/DEC/1995
    Phone Number: 487-9468
    Occupation: Sheriff's Deputy

  Witness Statement

  • When I left my stake-out spot, across the road from the cemetery on top of a roof. I went to my car which I had parked behind the church in a small alleyway. I ran to my cruiser, I noticed him sitting in his vehicle there, and he then started shouting at me and reversing towards me. I ignored it as I was masked, and I didn't really want to be seen in the first place....
    
    He then followed me all the way up North, even when I increased speed and I had to call units to get him off my ass. He then starts putting up a show that I was in his car, and I was near his stolen vehicle. Yet when I first saw his vehicle, he was already in it, I hopped the fence and noticed him as I was running to my cruiser, I didn't expect to see anyone there. So that's a blatant lie, then he says he "retrieved" his stolen vehicle here, yet there's no 911 call about a stolen car, and he accuses me of stealing it in the first place.
    
    My bodycam will show I was on the roof all the time. And only ran across the cemetery to get to my cruiser. So his arrest was justified.

  Witness Affirmation

  • I, Nacho Navarro, affirm that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I affirm that this statement has been made voluntarily, made without promise of reward, and made not under threat, force, or coercion. ((I affirm that all information submitted has been obtained via In-Character means.))
    
    Signed,
    
    
    Nacho Navarro
    Deputy Sheriff III
    Los Santos Sheriff's Department
    
    Date: 19/JAN/2025

  
  

Terence Williams
Attorney General
San Andreas Judicial Branch
234-9321 — [email protected]

[Terence Williams]

San Andreas Judicial Branch Docket Notice "HERE FOR YOU | SAFE FOR YOU"

---

• Honorable Judge Kant and pertaining parties,
  
  The Prosecution is still awaiting a response from the Sheriff's Department regarding our request to release the arresting deputy's bodycam footage.
  
  Regards,
  
  Terence Williams
  Attorney General
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  234-9321 — [email protected]

[Larin Tai]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci

A Motion for Discovery was filed in the above case on the 31st of January, 2025.

The State of San Andreas, by and through the undersigned attorney, filed this Motion for Discovery, and presents the following as evidence;

• Exhibit #4: Bodycam from Nacho Navarro

  
  

  Bodycam proof of RP ((time is in EST so UTC -5 ))

  

Larin Tai
Prosecutor
San Andreas Judicial Branch
244-5389 — [email protected]

[Hope Kant]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a FIRST notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Associate Justice
  Branch Administrator
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  505-9925 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a SECOND notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Court Clerk
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Docket Notice
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

• Parties,
  
  This is to serve as a THIRD notice to the defendant that bench trials are currently scheduled on multiple days throughout the week. Please notify the court if these times do not work for you. The expectation of the court is that each defendant file a notice for availability in the next 7 days. Date, times, and formatting shown here. The courts will only provide the defendant three notices prior to involuntarily dismissing the case in favor of prosecution due to lack of response from the defendant.
  
  Respectfully,
  
  
  Superior Court Judge
  San Andreas Judicial Branch
  (909) 304-2935 — [email protected]

[Sayaka Yukimura]

San Andreas Judicial Branch
Superior Court of San Andreas
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"

---

COURT DECISION

---

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS

State of San Andreas v. David Vespucci
#25-BT-0009

A decision was reached in the above case on the 30th day of April, 2025.

Due to a lack of response from the defendant in the above case, the case will now be involuntarily dismissed. The defendant was given ample time to interact and file availability. If any of the dates and times did not align with the schedule of the defendant, they were able to contact the courts stating the like. As no contact has been made with the courts aside from the initial filing, this case will now be dismissed and the charges will remain on the record of the defendant.


Respectfully,


Superior Court Judge
San Andreas Judicial Branch
(909) 304-2935 — [email protected]